Differences in the relative influence of product attributes under alternative processing conditions: Attribute importance versus attribute ease of imagability

We present two experiments that test whether ease of imagability can shift the influence of a product attribute without affecting its assessed importance in the decision. Results of the experiments indicate that more easily imagined attributes may have a disproportionate influence when subjects use imagery in the evaluation, but not when they engage in more analytical processing. Experiments 1 and 2 differ in the manner in which method of evaluation (imagery based vs. nonimagery based) was manipulated. In Experiment 1, use of imagery was manipulated through explicit instructions to either engage in or refrain from using imagery, whereas use of imagery was manipulated in Experiment 2 by varying the overall value of the alternatives. Results of Experiment 2 indicate that subjects who were asked to evaluate alternatives that were described in generally positive terms used imagery in the evaluation, placing greater emphasis on the easily imagined attributes, whereas subjects who were asked to evaluate alternatives that were described in generally negative terms or mixed positive and negative terms did not use imagery, basing their evaluations on attribute importance. Our findings support the hypothesis that consumers may at times evaluate alternatives by using an imagery heuristic , which involves imagining the actual experience with an alternative and assessing the desirability of the alternative according to the affective response to this imagined experience.

[1]  John R. Hauser,et al.  Assessment of Attribute Importances and Consumer Utility Functions: von Neumann-Morgenstern Theory Applied to Consumer Behavior , 1979 .

[2]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation , 1986 .

[3]  B. Sternthal,et al.  Detecting and Explaining Vividness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments , 1984 .

[4]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Linear regression and process-tracing models of judgment. , 1979 .

[5]  B. Kahn,et al.  Consumer Multiattribute Judgments under Attribute-Weight Uncertainty , 1991 .

[6]  Peter Wright,et al.  Product Class Advertising Effects on First-Time Buyers' Decision Strategies , 1980 .

[7]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Effects of concomitant verbal recall on order effects in personality impression formation , 1963 .

[8]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions , 1987 .

[9]  Punam Anand,et al.  The Effect of Vivid Attributes on the Evaluation of Alternatives: The Role of Differential Attention and Cognitive Elaboration , 1989 .

[10]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Choices from Sets Including Remembered Brands: Use of Recalled Attributes and Prior Overall Evaluations , 1988 .

[11]  J. Reyher,et al.  Spontaneous and directed visual imagery: Image failure and image substitution. , 1985 .

[12]  Herbert Moskowitz,et al.  Assessing Scenario Probabilities Via Interactive Goal Programming , 1984 .

[13]  J. Frank Yates,et al.  Evaluation of Partially Described Multiattribute Options , 1978 .

[14]  Ann L. McGill,et al.  The effect of imagery on information processing strategy in a multiattribute choice task , 1989 .

[15]  John W. Payne,et al.  Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆ , 1976 .

[16]  B. Sternthal,et al.  The Effects of Program Involvement and Ease of Message Counterarguing on Advertising Persuasiveness , 1992 .

[17]  F. Kardes,et al.  Spontaneous Inference Processes in Advertising: The Effects of Conclusion Omission and Involvement on Persuasion , 1988 .

[18]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Improving Predictive Power of Conjoint Analysis by Constrained Parameter Estimation , 1983 .

[19]  Paul E. Green,et al.  Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review , 1984 .

[20]  S. Proctor,et al.  Imaginal correlates of self-reported fear and avoidance behavior. , 1977, Behaviour research and therapy.

[21]  Imran S. Currim,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Multiattribute Consumer Preference Models , 1984 .

[22]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. , 1982 .

[23]  Barbara Means,et al.  The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. , 1983 .

[24]  James L. Ginter,et al.  An Investigation of Situational Variation in Brand Choice Behavior and Attitude , 1979 .

[25]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Advertising Effects on Attributes Recalled and Criteria Used for Brand Evaluations , 1983 .

[26]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[27]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Information Presentation Format on Consumer Information Acquisition Strategies , 1977 .

[28]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[29]  John W. Payne,et al.  Contingent decision behavior. , 1982 .