Paratransit in Southeast Asia: A Market Response to Poor Roads?

Southeast Asia's paratransit sector has become a vital source of mobility in many cities. Run by private operators, generally under free market conditions, paratransit vehicles maneuver into areas that standard buses cannot serve and provide frequent door-to-door service, at a profit. Yet despite past successes, pressure is mounting to greatly restrict or even ban paratransit vehicles from many cities, replacing ecaks, bajajs, tuktuks, microbuses, minibuses, and jeepneys with large buses operated by public monopolies. While it is well known that paratransit provides low performance services tailored to what poor people can pay, an often overlooked benefit is that it compensates for the inadequacies of many roads in Southeast Asian Cities. This paper empirically tests the extent to which mixes of paratransit fleets and services have evolved so as to adapt to the low capacity, poorly interconnected road systems in this part of the world. Using data for eight of Southeast Asia's largest cities, it is found that the greatest variety of paratransit modes, both in terms of types and seating capacities, generally exists in the places with the least amount of road capacity per capital and a poor road hierarchy. The paper concludes that any retrenchment in paratransit's role in Southeast Asian cities should be governed by market conditions rather than government fiat.

[1]  M. Roschlau Nationalisation of privatisation: policy and prospects for public transport in Southeast Asia , 1989 .

[2]  Y. Y. Leng,et al.  Urban transportation problems in Singapore: prospects for solution , 1988 .

[3]  H. Dick Urban Public Transport: Jakarta, Surabaya and Malang Part I , 1981 .

[4]  M. Mogridge THE JAKARTA TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STUDY. 3. IMPACT OF HIGH "PARA-TRANSIT" FLOWS , 1983 .

[5]  P. Rimmer,et al.  IMPROVING URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SOUTHEAST ASIAN CITIES: SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE CONVENTIONAL AND UNCONVENTIONAL WISDOM , 1980 .

[6]  K J Fehon,et al.  TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT IN METRO MANILA: 2. SPECIFYING TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT MEASURES , 1986 .

[7]  F R Gennaoui Road hierarchy in country areas , 1986 .

[8]  John F. Lemmer,et al.  Causal Modeling , 1993, UAI.

[9]  Z. Arifin,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORTATION PROBLEM IN JAKARTA METROPOLITAN AREA , 1988 .

[10]  T. A. Chua Transport in Malaysia , 1983 .

[11]  D. Silcock Urban paratransit in the developing world , 1981 .

[12]  S. Kedkovid,et al.  PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN BANGKOK , 1989 .

[13]  P. White,et al.  THE BENEFITS OF MINIBUSES: A COMMENT , 1981 .

[14]  P. Rimmer Rikisha to Rapid Transit: Urban Public Transport Systems and Policy in Southeast Asia , 1986 .

[15]  P J Rimmer,et al.  URBAN PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SOUTHEAST ASIA : A CASE STUDY OF TECHNOLOGICAL IMPERIALISM? , 1986 .

[16]  U. Chujoh Learning from medium- and small-sized bus services in developing countries: Is regulation necessary? , 1989 .

[17]  A. H. Spencer,et al.  The car in Southeast Asia , 1989 .

[18]  A. M. Mora,et al.  Urban transport problems in the Philippines, prospect for solution , 1988 .

[19]  Jenny Morris Urban public transport , 1981 .

[20]  Kunchit Phiu Nual A study on traffic improvement program in Bangkok , 1990 .

[21]  K W Ogden,et al.  TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT IN METRO MANILA: 1. FORMULATING TRAFFIC POLICIES , 1986 .

[22]  D. Maunder,et al.  PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SURABAYA, INDONESIA , 1978 .

[23]  P. Krynetr Bangkok Mass Transit Authority: a case of monopoly versus competition , 1988 .

[24]  B. Soegijoko Public transportation in Bandung , 1980 .

[25]  J. A. Chee-Meoww GOVERNMENT POLICY CHOICES AND PUBLIC TRANSPORT OPERATIONS IN SINGAPORE , 1980 .

[26]  Louis J. Pignataro,et al.  Traffic Engineering Theory and Practice , 1973 .

[27]  B. Sinsap,et al.  Urban transportation problems in Bangkok: prospects for solution (Thailand) , 1988 .

[28]  J. M. Thomson,et al.  Great cities and their traffic , 1977 .