Social Media and Public Administration in Spain: A Comparative Analysis of the Regional Level of Government

The chapter investigates the employment of digital social media by Spanish regional administrations: its presence, the factors that determine that presence, as well as the self-perception of those responsible for its management. This study raises the following questions: What are the key factors that explain the use of social media in public administrations? What is the self-perception of those responsible for the management of digital social media about its current level of development within their organisations? What are the main inhibitors-facilitators for the development of digital social media in public administrations? What are the next steps to promote digital social media in the sphere of public organisations? This chapter is based on a questionnaire that was responded to by those responsible for the management of digital social media in the Spanish regional administrations. This research shows that Web 2.0 tools are more oriented to explore potential changes in the relations between the public administrations and citizens, than to innovate the functioning of public sector organisations. In sum, this chapter offers a relevant analysis, although it is of an exploratory character because of the almost total absence of systematic studies about the diffusion of digital social media within Spanish public administrations. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4173-0.ch014

[1]  A. Kaplan,et al.  Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media , 2010 .

[2]  Klemens Böhm,et al.  Impact assessment in public policy: Towards a Web 2.0 application , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[3]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  James Melitski,et al.  E-Government and E-Governance: Converging Constructs of Public Sector Information and Communications Technologies , 2007 .

[5]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[6]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  James N. Danziger,et al.  THE IMPACTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: AN ANALYSIS OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH FROM THE “GOLDEN AGE” OF TRANSFORMATION[1] , 2002 .

[8]  Brian E. Dixon,et al.  Towards E-Government 2.0: An Assessment of Where E-Government 2.0 Is and Where It Is Headed , 2010 .

[9]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Finding information in an era of abundance: Towards a collaborative tagging environment in government , 2010, Inf. Polity.

[10]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Albert Jacob Meijer,et al.  Alignment 2.0: Strategic use of new internet technologies in government , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Enacting Electronic Government Success , 2012, Integrated Series in Information Systems.

[15]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Dual effects of the internet on political activism: Reinforcing and mobilizing , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  David Camacho,et al.  Experiences using social networks in Spanish public administrations , 2011, WIMS '11.