Validation of the French Utrecht Work Engagement Scale and its relationship with personality traits and impulsivity

Abstract Introduction Work engagement is a positive state of mind related to work, characterized by vigor, dedication, and absorption. It is measured through the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), which has shown good psychometric properties across occupational types and languages. Besides, some individuals may more easily experience work engagement than others, suggesting that individual stable tendencies could predict this state of mind. Objectives In this article, we aim to: (1) present the psychometric properties of the French versions of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9 and UWES-17), and (2) assess whether work engagement can be associated with personality traits and impulsivity. Method For this purpose, 661 French-speaking workers ( M age  = 40.86, SD age  = 12.35) were recruited in the French-speaking part of Switzerland. Two hundred and eleven subjects responded to the UWES-17, the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire (ZKA-PQ) and the UPPS Impulsive Behaviour Scale (UPPS), and 450 subjects responded to the UWES-9 and the NEO-Five-Factor Inventory Revised (NEO-FFI-R). Results Results showed that UWES-9 reached better psychometric properties than UWES-17. Moreover, it appeared that individuals who were active, conscientious, emotionally stable, and extroverted were more prone to experience work engagement than others. Discussion Thus, the path to experiencing work engagement seems to differ as a function of personal stable characteristics. Further studies should analyse how personal characteristics interact with working conditions in determining work engagement.

[1]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[2]  Avshalom Caspi,et al.  Personality development: stability and change. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[3]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Defining and measuring work engagement : Bringing clarity to the concept , 2010 .

[4]  Melissa A. Cyders,et al.  Mood-based rash action and its components: Positive and negative urgency , 2007 .

[5]  Donald R. Lynam,et al.  Validation of the UPPS impulsive behaviour scale: a four‐factor model of impulsivity , 2005 .

[6]  Mathias Allemand,et al.  Age differences in five personality domains across the life span. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[7]  R. McCrae,et al.  Self‐Regulation and the Five‐Factor Model of Personality Traits , 2010 .

[8]  Kevin J. Eschleman,et al.  Employee personality as a moderator of the relationships between work stressors and counterproductive work behavior. , 2010, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[9]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  “Same Same” But Different?: Can Work Engagement Be Discriminated from Job Involvement and Organizational Commitment? , 2006 .

[10]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  Psychometric Properties of the Italian Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9) A Cross-Cultural Analysis , 2010 .

[11]  Kristen K. Shanine,et al.  The moderating role of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the work engagement-performance process. , 2013, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[12]  Con Stough,et al.  The role of personality in the job demands-resources model A study of Australian academic staff , 2010 .

[13]  K. Vohs,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation : research, theory, and applications , 2004 .

[14]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Burnout and work engagement: Do individual differences make a difference? , 2006 .

[15]  P. Costa,et al.  A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory , 2004 .

[16]  J. Rossier,et al.  Comparison of the NEO-FFI, the NEO-FFI-R and an alternative short version of the NEO-PI-R (NEO-60) in Swiss and Spanish samples , 2005 .

[17]  A. Tolvanen,et al.  The Construct Validity of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Multisample and Longitudinal Evidence , 2008 .

[18]  Seth A. Kaplan,et al.  The affective underpinnings of job perceptions and attitudes: a meta-analytic review and integration. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  A. Bakker,et al.  Work engagement, performance and active learning : the role of conscientiousness. , 2012 .

[20]  J. Rossier,et al.  The Impact of Personality and Culture on the Job Demands-Control Model of Job Stress , 2012 .

[21]  J. Rossier,et al.  Zuckerman's Revised Alternative Five-Factor Model: Validation of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman-Aluja Personality Questionnaire in Four French-Speaking Countries , 2012, Journal of personality assessment.

[22]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach , 2002 .

[23]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Nature and Use of Personality in Selection , 2012 .

[24]  A. Bakker,et al.  The Measurement of Work Engagement With a Short Questionnaire , 2006 .

[25]  Paul E. Spector The relationship of personality to counterproductive work behavior (CWB): An integration of perspectives , 2010 .

[26]  C. DeYoung Impulsivity as a personality trait. , 2011 .

[27]  J. Rossier,et al.  Career Adapt-Abilities Scale in a French-Speaking Swiss Sample: Psychometric Properties and Relationships to Personality and Work Engagement. , 2012 .

[28]  S. Whiteside,et al.  The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity , 2001 .

[29]  L. A. Pervin Personality: Theory and Research , 1984 .

[30]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Work Engagement in Japan: Validation of the Japanese Version of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale , 2008 .

[31]  Wilmar B. Schaufeli,et al.  Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles? , 2006 .

[32]  Antoine Bechara,et al.  Decision-making and impulse control after frontal lobe injuries , 2005, Current opinion in neurology.

[33]  D. Ones,et al.  Individual differences as predictors of work, educational, and broad life outcomes , 2010 .

[34]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  Workaholism, Burnout, and Work Engagement: Three of a Kind or Three Different Kinds of Employee Well‐being? , 2008 .

[35]  A. Bakker,et al.  Passion for work: Work engagement versus workaholism. , 2010 .

[36]  R. Kessler,et al.  The prevalence and workplace costs of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a large manufacturing firm , 2008, Psychological Medicine.

[37]  Samuel D Gosling,et al.  Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  Alexander Bakker,et al.  An Evidence-Based Model of Work Engagement , 2011 .