Toward an artificial sensory feedback system for prosthetic mobility rehabilitation: examination of sensorimotor responses.

People with lower-limb amputation have reduced mobility due to loss of sensory information, which may be restored by artificial sensory feedback systems built into prostheses. For an effective system, it is important to understand how humans sense, interpret, and respond to the feedback that would be provided. The goal of this study was to examine sensorimotor responses to mobility-relevant stimuli. Three experiments were performed to examine the effects of location of stimuli, frequency of stimuli, and means for providing the response. Stimuli, given as vibrations, were applied to the thigh region, and responses involved leg movements. Sensorimotor reaction time (RT) was measured as the duration between application of the stimulus and initiation of the response. Accuracy of response was also measured. Overall average RTs for one response option were 0.808 +/- 0.142 s, and response accuracies were >90%. Higher frequencies (220 vs 140 Hz) of vibration stimulus provided in anterior regions of the thigh produced the fastest RTs. When participants were presented with more than one stimulus and response option, RTs increased. Findings suggest that long sensorimotor responses may be a limiting factor in the development of an artificial feedback system for mobility rehabilitation applications; however, feed-forward techniques could potentially help to address these limitations.

[1]  Ahmet Salim Göktepe,et al.  Energy Expenditure of Walking with Prostheses: Comparison of Three Amputation Levels , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[2]  B T Engel,et al.  On the relationships among sex, age, response mode, cardiac cycle phase, breathing cycle phase, and simple reaction time. , 1972, Journal of gerontology.

[3]  R. T. Verrillo.  Psychophysics of vibrotactile stimulation. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  L. Richards,et al.  Effects of age, step direction, and reaction condition on the ability to step quickly. , 2002, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[5]  R. Cholewiak.  space, and time , 1999 .

[6]  E. W. Johnson,et al.  Normal conduction velocity in the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. , 1974, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  A. Geurts,et al.  Dual-task assessment of reorganization of postural control in persons with lower limb amputation. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[8]  A. Geurts,et al.  Attention demands in balance recovery following lower limb amputation. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  W. Miller,et al.  The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Chih-Hung King,et al.  A Haptic Feedback System for Lower-Limb Prostheses , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[11]  Brooks,et al.  Electrophysiological Study of the Posterior Cutaneous Femoral Nerve: Normative Data , 2011 .

[12]  Ian J. Deary,et al.  Reaction times and intelligence differences: A population-based cohort study , 2001 .

[13]  Douglas Mottley.  Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Board Review , 2006 .

[14]  M. Rowe,et al.  Vibrotactile frequency discrimination in human hairy skin. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  B. Etnyre,et al.  Postcontraction Influences on Reaction Time , 2002, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[16]  A. Geurts,et al.  Postural reorganization following lower limb amputation. Possible motor and sensory determinants of recovery. , 2020, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[17]  S. Schultz.  Principles of Neural Science, 4th ed. , 2001 .

[18]  F. Horak,et al.  Auditory biofeedback substitutes for loss of sensory information in maintaining stance , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  Jim Richards,et al.  Whittle's gait analysis , 2012 .

[20]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Handbook of the Psychology of Aging , 1979 .

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Spatial compatibility and anatomical factors in simple and choice reaction time , 1977, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  M. Nash,et al.  Energy expenditure of trans-tibial amputees during ambulation at self-selected pace , 1994, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[23]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Peter H. Veltink,et al.  Vibrotactile stimulation of the upper leg: Effects of location, stimulation method and habituation , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[25]  F. Asseman,et al.  Effectiveness of a vibro-tactile feedback to cue a stepping response to a balance challenge. , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Workshop on Haptic Audio Visual Environments and their Applications (HAVE 2006).

[26]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Using vibrotactile feedback of instability to trigger a forward compensatory stepping response , 2007, Journal of Neurology.

[27]  Carroll J. Bellis,et al.  Reaction Time and Chronological Age , 1933 .

[28]  Marcos Duarte,et al.  Age-related changes in human postural control of prolonged standing. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[29]  Anne M.R. Agur,et al.  Grant's Atlas of Anatomy , 1943 .

[30]  P M Quesada,et al.  Lower-limb proprioception in above-knee amputees. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[31]  J. Delisa,et al.  MEDIAL FEMORAL CUTANEOUS NERVE CONDUCTION , 1995, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[32]  S. A. Rose,et al.  A longitudinal study of visual expectation and reaction time in the first year of life. , 2002, Child development.

[33]  K. Hagberg,et al.  Can vibratory feedback be used to improve postural stability in persons with transtibial limb loss? , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[34]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Identifying the role of proprioception in upper-limb prosthesis control: Studies on targeted motion , 2010, TAP.

[35]  Warren S. Grundfest,et al.  Pilot testing of a haptic feedback rehabilitation system on a lower-limb amputee , 2009, 2009 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering.

[36]  Jack A. Adams,et al.  Proprioceptive control of human movement , 1977 .

[37]  Roger W. Cholewiak,et al.  The Perception of Tactile Distance: Influences of Body Site, Space, and Time , 1999 .

[38]  Johnson Ew,et al.  Normal conduction velocity in the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. , 1974 .

[39]  Sara J. Cuccurullo.  Comprar Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Board Review, Second Edition | Sara J. Cuccurullo | 9781933864181 | Demos Medical Publishing , 2009 .

[40]  L. E. Longstreth,et al.  Exceptions to Hick's law: explorations with a response duration measure. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[41]  D. Potvin,et al.  Enabling factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.