Quantitative analysis of intracellular communication and signaling errors in signaling networks

BackgroundIntracellular signaling networks transmit signals from the cell membrane to the nucleus, via biochemical interactions. The goal is to regulate some target molecules, to properly control the cell function. Regulation of the target molecules occurs through the communication of several intermediate molecules that convey specific signals originated from the cell membrane to the specific target outputs.ResultsIn this study we propose to model intracellular signaling network as communication channels. We define the fundamental concepts of transmission error and signaling capacity for intracellular signaling networks, and devise proper methods for computing these parameters. The developed systematic methodology quantitatively shows how the signals that ligands provide upon binding can be lost in a pathological signaling network, due to the presence of some dysfunctional molecules. We show the lost signals result in message transmission error, i.e., incorrect regulation of target proteins at the network output. Furthermore, we show how dysfunctional molecules affect the signaling capacity of signaling networks and how the contributions of signaling molecules to the signaling capacity and signaling errors can be computed. The proposed approach can quantify the role of dysfunctional signaling molecules in the development of the pathology. We present experimental data on caspese3 and T cell signaling networks to demonstrate the biological relevance of the developed method and its predictions.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates how signal transmission and distortion in pathological signaling networks can be modeled and studied using the proposed methodology. The new methodology determines how much the functionality of molecules in a network can affect the signal transmission and regulation of the end molecules such as transcription factors. This can lead to the identification of novel critical molecules in signal transduction networks. Dysfunction of these critical molecules is likely to be associated with some complex human disorders. Such critical molecules have the potential to serve as proper targets for drug discovery.

[1]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Communications , 1983 .

[2]  Claudine Chaouiya,et al.  Logical Modelling of Regulatory Networks, Methods and Applications , 2013, Bulletin of Mathematical Biology.

[3]  B. Hemmings,et al.  Advances in protein kinase B signalling: AKTion on multiple fronts. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[4]  H. Saunders,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes (2nd Edition) , 1989 .

[5]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Boolean Network Model Predicts Knockout Mutant Phenotypes of Fission Yeast , 2013, PloS one.

[6]  Alison K. Hottes,et al.  Global Discovery of Adaptive Mutations , 2009, Nature Methods.

[7]  Lili X. Peng,et al.  A High-throughput Quantitative Multiplex Kinase Assay for Monitoring Information Flow in Signaling Networks , 2003, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[8]  L. Cantley,et al.  Targeting the PI3K-Akt pathway in human cancer: rationale and promise. , 2003, Cancer cell.

[9]  Michelle L. Wynn,et al.  Logic-based models in systems biology: a predictive and parameter-free network analysis method. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[10]  Hubert P. Yockey,et al.  Information theory, evolution and the origin of life , 2005, Inf. Sci..

[11]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[12]  B. Alberts,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell 4th edition , 2007 .

[13]  A. Bruce Carlson,et al.  Communication systems: an introduction to signals and noise in electrical communication , 1975 .

[14]  Réka Albert,et al.  Boolean modeling of transcriptome data reveals novel modes of heterotrimeric G-protein action , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[15]  C. Daub,et al.  BMC Systems Biology , 2007 .

[16]  Koichi Kobayashi,et al.  Optimal Control of Gene Regulatory Networks with Effectiveness of Multiple Drugs: A Boolean Network Approach , 2013, BioMed research international.

[17]  Guy Karlebach,et al.  Inferring Boolean network states from partial information , 2013, EURASIP J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol..

[18]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  The Response of Human Epithelial Cells to TNF Involves an Inducible Autocrine Cascade , 2006, Cell.

[19]  Hubert P. Yockey,et al.  Information theory, evolution, and the origin of life: Index , 2005 .

[20]  Prahlad T. Ram,et al.  Formation of Regulatory Patterns During Signal Propagation in a Mammalian Cellular Network , 2005, Science.

[21]  Peter K. Sorger,et al.  Logic-Based Models for the Analysis of Cell Signaling Networks† , 2010, Biochemistry.

[22]  Assieh Saadatpour,et al.  Boolean modeling of biological regulatory networks: a methodology tutorial. , 2013, Methods.

[23]  S. Klamt,et al.  Modeling approaches for qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of cellular signaling networks , 2013, Cell Communication and Signaling.

[24]  J. C. Pratt,et al.  Cloning of p97/Gab2, the major SHP2-binding protein in hematopoietic cells, reveals a novel pathway for cytokine-induced gene activation. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[25]  M. Karayiorgou,et al.  Convergent evidence for impaired AKT1-GSK3β signaling in schizophrenia , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[26]  Saeed Tavazoie,et al.  Molecular Systems Biology 6; Article number 378; doi:10.1038/msb.2010.33 Citation: Molecular Systems Biology 6:378 , 2022 .

[27]  Xin Liu,et al.  Dynamical and Structural Analysis of a T Cell Survival Network Identifies Novel Candidate Therapeutic Targets for Large Granular Lymphocyte Leukemia , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[29]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[30]  A. Abdi,et al.  Fault Diagnosis Engineering in Molecular Signaling Networks: An Overview and Applications in Target Discovery , 2010, Chemistry & biodiversity.

[31]  Steffen Klamt,et al.  A Logical Model Provides Insights into T Cell Receptor Signaling , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[32]  Oliver Sawodny,et al.  Integration of Boolean models exemplified on hepatocyte signal transduction , 2012, Briefings Bioinform..

[33]  A. Abdi,et al.  Fault Diagnosis Engineering of Digital Circuits Can Identify Vulnerable Molecules in Complex Cellular Pathways , 2008, Science Signaling.

[34]  G. Feng,et al.  Conditional Deletion of Shp2 Tyrosine Phosphatase in Thymocytes Suppresses Both Pre-TCR and TCR Signals1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[35]  Kyung-Soon Park,et al.  SHP2 is a downstream target of ZAP70 to regulate JAK1/STAT3 and ERK signaling pathways in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2010, FEBS letters.

[36]  Réka Albert,et al.  Elementary signaling modes predict the essentiality of signal transduction network components , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[37]  T. Helikar,et al.  Emergent decision-making in biological signal transduction networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Aurélien Naldi,et al.  Logical modelling of gene regulatory networks with GINsim. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[39]  A. Ganser,et al.  Enhanced sensitivity to inhibition of SHP2, STAT5, and Gab2 expression in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). , 2006, Blood.

[40]  Bruno O. Shubert,et al.  Random variables and stochastic processes , 1979 .

[41]  Rui-Sheng Wang,et al.  Boolean modeling in systems biology: an overview of methodology and applications , 2012, Physical biology.

[42]  B. Whitehouse Evolution And The Origin Of Life , 2009 .