Interactions between the EU Emissions Trading Scheme and the UK Renewables Obligation and Energy Efficiency Commitment

The recent agreement by European environment ministers on the ground rules for an EU Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) represents a landmark in the evolution of EU climate policy. But this scheme will be introduced into a crowded ‘policy space’ within each Member State in which complex interactions between the EU ETS and existing instruments appear unavoidable. This paper explores one aspect of the problems created by the EU ETS for the UK – namely the potential interactions with the UK Renewables Obligation and the UK Energy Efficiency Commitment. Both these instruments have objectives which go beyond the least-cost abatement of carbon emissions and both utilise trading arrangements in which the trading commodity is denominated in MWh rather than tonnes of carbon. The paper explores the potential interactions between the EU ETS and the UK instruments by comparing in turn their scope, timing, objectives and operation. The coexistence of the EU ETS with the RO and EEC is shown to raise three important issues, namely target setting and double counting, double regulation of electricity and the fungibility of trading commodities. The paper concludes that the coexistence of the RO and EEC with the EU ETS is both possible and justifiable, but more attention should be paid to the non-CO2 objectives of each instrument.

[1]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Induced Technical Change in Energy and Environmental Modeling: Analytic Approaches and Policy Implications , 2002 .

[2]  Stine Grenaa Jensen,et al.  Simultaneous attainment of energy goals by means of green certificates and emission permits , 2003 .

[3]  Dieter Helm,et al.  A critique of renewables policy in the UK , 2002 .

[4]  Poul Erik Morthorst,et al.  Interactions of a tradable green certificate market with a tradable permits market , 2001 .

[5]  Marc Roberts,et al.  Effluent charges and licenses under uncertainty , 1976 .

[6]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process , 1989 .

[7]  P Ekins,et al.  Sustainable Energy for the UK: the Economic and Environmental Implications to 2020 of a Sustainable Energy Strategy for the UK , 2001 .

[8]  E. Woerdman Developing a European Carbon Trading Market: Will Permit Allocation Distort Competition and Lead to State Aid? , 2001 .

[9]  K. Arrow The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing , 1962 .

[10]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  The renewables NFFO: A review , 1995 .

[11]  A. Stirling Diversity and ignorance in electricity supply investment: Addressing the solution rather than the problem☆ , 1994 .

[12]  Thomas E. Hoff,et al.  Distributed generation: An alternative to electric utility investments in system capacity , 1996 .

[13]  Timothy J. Foxon,et al.  Policy support for innovation to secure improvements in resource productivity , 2003 .

[14]  D. Finon,et al.  Feed-in tarifs versus quotas : how to promote renewables and stimulate technical progress for cost decrease ? , 2002 .

[15]  S. Smith,et al.  The distributional consequences of environmental taxes , 1990 .