A literature-based approach to annotation and browsing of Web resources

The emerging Semantic Web technologies critically depend on the availability of shared knowledge representations called ontologies, which are intended to encode consensual knowledge about specific domains. Currently, the proposed processes for building and maintaining those ontologies entail the joint effort of groups of representative domain experts, which can be expensive in terms of co-ordination and in terms of time to reach consensus. In this paper, literature-based ontologies, which can be initially developed by a single expert and maintained continuously, are proposed as preliminary alternatives to group-generated domain ontologies, or as early versions of them. These ontologies encode domain knowledge in the form of terms and relations along with the (formal or informal) bibliographical resources that define or deal with them, which makes them specially useful for domains in which a common terminology or jargon is not soundly established. A generalpurpose metamodelling framework for literature-based ontologies - which has been used in two concrete domains - is described, along with a proposed methodology and a specific resource annotation approach. In addition, the implementation of a RDF-based Web resource browser - that uses the ontologies to guide the user in the exploration of a corpus of digital resources- is presented as a proof of concept.

[1]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[2]  Maite Gata Amaya,et al.  Nuevas tecnologias aplicadas a la educacion , 2004 .

[3]  Miguel Ángel Sicilia Urbán,et al.  Una ontología para la anotación de recursos sobre evaluación de la usabilidad: diseño y mecanismos de recuperación , 2003 .

[4]  Shiyong Lu,et al.  The Semantic Web: opportunities and challenges for next-generation Web applications , 2002, Inf. Res..

[5]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  The semantic web: yet another hip? , 2002, Data Knowl. Eng..

[6]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Language Standardization for the Semantic Web: The Long Way from OIL to OWL , 2002, DCW.

[7]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  A collaborative approach to ontology design , 2002, CACM.

[8]  Nicola Guarino,et al.  Evaluating ontological decisions with OntoClean , 2002, CACM.

[9]  Lloyd Rutledge,et al.  Hypermedia and the Semantic Web: A Research Agenda , 2001, J. Digit. Inf..

[10]  Vipul Kashyap,et al.  The Emergent semantic web: a consensus approach for deriving semantic knowledge on the web , 2001 .

[11]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Ontology Library Systems: The key to successful Ontology Reuse , 2001, SWWS.

[12]  Stephen Cranefield UML and the Semantic Web , 2001, SWWS.

[13]  Marja-Riitta Koivunen,et al.  Annotea: an open RDF infrastructure for shared Web annotations , 2001, WWW '01.

[14]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  An ontology for biological function based on molecular interactions , 2000, Bioinform..

[15]  David Robins,et al.  Interactive Information Retrieval: Context and Basic Notions , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[16]  Sujeet Shenoi,et al.  Proximity relations in the fuzzy relational database model , 1999 .

[17]  Michael D. Gordon,et al.  Finding Information on the World Wide Web: The Retrieval Effectiveness of Search Engines , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Ontological Engineering: A state of the Art , 1999 .

[19]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Community is knowledge! in (KA)2 , 1998 .

[20]  AnnBritt Enochsson FINDING INFORMATION ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB , 1998 .

[21]  Grady Booch,et al.  Object-oriented analysis and design with applications (2nd ed.) , 1993 .

[22]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993, Knowl. Acquis..

[23]  James E. Rumbaugh,et al.  Object-Oriented Modelling and Design , 1991 .

[24]  Grady Booch,et al.  Object-Oriented Analysis and Design with Applications , 1990 .

[25]  B. Buckles,et al.  A fuzzy representation of data for relational databases , 1982 .