Comparative evaluation of ropivacaine versus dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries

Background: Various adjuvant are being used with local anesthetics for prolongation of intra operative and postoperative analgesia in epidural block for lower limb surgeries. Dexmedetomidine, the highly selective α2 adrenergic agonist is a new neuroaxial adjuvant gaining popularity. The aim of the present study was to compare the hemodynamic, sedative and analgesia potentiating effects of epidurally administered dexmedetomidine when combined with ropivacaine. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in prospective, randomized double-blind manner in which 100 patients of American Society of Anesthesiologist Grade I and II in the age group of 20-65 years of either sex under going lower limb surgeries were included after taking informed consent. The patients were randomly allocated into two groups of 50 each. Epidural anesthesia was given with 150 mg of 0.75% ropivacaine in Group A (n = 50) and 150 mg of 0.75% ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine (1 μg/kg) in Group B (n = 50). Two groups were compared with respect to hemodynamic changes, block characteristics which included time to onset of analgesia at T10, maximum sensory analgesic level, time to maximum sensory and motor block, time to regression at S1 dermatome and time to the first dose of rescue analgesia for 24 h. At the end of study, data was compiled and analyzed statistically using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Student t-test. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant and P < 0.001 as highly significant. Results: Significant difference was observed in relation to the duration of sensory block (375.20 ± 15.97 min in Group A and 535.18 ± 19.85 min in Group B [P - 0.000]), duration of motor block (259.80 ± 15.48 min in Group A and 385.92 ± 17.71 min in Group B [P - 0.000]), duration of post-operative analgesia (312.64 ± 16.21 min in Group A and 496.56 ± 16.08 min in Group B [P < 0.001]) and consequently low doses of rescue analgesia in Group B (1.44 ± 0.501) as compared to Group A (2.56 ± 0.67). Sedation score was significantly more in Group B in the post-operative period. Conclusion: Epidural Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to Ropivacaine is associated with prolonged sensory and motor block, hemodynamic stability, prolonged postoperative analgesia and reduced demand for rescue analgesics when compared to plain Ropivacaine.

[1]  M. A. O. Ignacio,et al.  How to cite this article , 2016 .

[2]  S. Shaikh,et al.  Comparison Of Epidural Bupivacaine 0.5% With Epidural Ropivacaine 0.75% For Lower Limb Orthopedic Procedures , 2012 .

[3]  S. Bajwa,et al.  Comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl for epidural analgesia in lower limb orthopedic surgeries , 2011, Saudi journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  A. Thavamani,et al.  Effects of dexmedetomidine added to caudal ropivacaine in paediatric lower abdominal surgeries , 2011, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[5]  A. Grewal.  Dexmedetomidine: New avenues , 2011, Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology.

[6]  Anita Singh,et al.  Dexmedetomidine and clonidine in epidural anaesthesia: A comparative evaluation , 2011, Indian journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  Senad Ljuca,et al.  Influence of clonidine on the chemodynamic stability and stress response in the course of surgery on general anesthesia. , 2011, Medicinski arhiv.

[8]  M. Elshafei,et al.  Effect of epidural dexmedetomidine on intraoperative awareness and post‐operative pain after one‐lung ventilation , 2010, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  A. El-hennawy,et al.  Addition of clonidine or dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine prolongs caudal analgesia in children. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  Ayman Qatawneh,et al.  Effect of Adding Dexmedetomidine versus Fentanyl to Intrathecal Bupivacaine on Spinal Block Characteristics in Gynecological Procedures: A Double Blind Controlled Study , 2009 .

[11]  A. Boker,et al.  Effect of dexmedetomidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine in a caudal block in pediatrics , 2009, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[12]  A. Farmery,et al.  The Analgesic Effect of Epidural Clonidine After Spinal Surgery: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  J. R. Braz,et al.  [Synergistic effect between dexmedetomidine and 0.75% ropivacaine in epidural anesthesia]. , 2008, Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira.

[14]  L. Maxwell,et al.  A Comparison of Epidural Bupivacaine-Fentanyl and Bupivacaine-Clonidine in Children Undergoing the Nuss Procedure , 2006, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[15]  A. Baraka,et al.  Effect of low‐dose dexmedetomidine or clonidine on the characteristics of bupivacaine spinal block , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[16]  Kerri M. Robertson,et al.  Dexmedetomidine Pharmacodynamics: Part II: Crossover Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in Healthy Volunteers , 2004, Anesthesiology.

[17]  L. Torres,et al.  [Dexmedetomidine, a promising drug]. , 2002, Revista espanola de anestesiologia y reanimacion.

[18]  P. Convery,et al.  The Efficacy and Safety of Epidural Infusions of Levobupivacaine With and Without Clonidine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[19]  R. Aantaa,et al.  Effect of clonidine and dexmedetomidine premedication on perioperative oxygen consumption and haemodynamic state. , 1997, British journal of anaesthesia.

[20]  D. Bylund,et al.  Alpha-2A is the predominant alpha-2 adrenergic receptor subtype in human spinal cord. , 1992, Anesthesiology.

[21]  G. Thompson,et al.  Comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing lower-extremity surgery. , 1990, Anesthesiology.