Adaptive evolution of attack ability promotes the evolutionary branching of predator species.

In this paper, with the methods of adaptive dynamics and critical function analysis, we investigate the evolutionary branching phenomenon of predator species. We assume that both the prey and predators are density-dependent and the predator's attack ability can adaptively evolve, but this has a cost in terms of its death rate. First, we identify the general properties of trade-off relationships that allow for a continuously stable strategy and evolutionary branching in the predator strategy. It is found that if the trade-off curve is weakly concave near the singular strategy, then the singular strategy may be an evolutionary branching point. Second, we find that after the branching has occurred in the predator strategy, if the trade-off curve is convex-concave-convex, the predator species will eventually evolve into two different types, which can stably coexist on the much longer evolutionary timescale and no further branching is possible.

[1]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of predator-prey systems: an ecological perspective , 1996, Journal of mathematical biology.

[2]  Yasuhiro Takeuchi,et al.  Adaptive evolution of anti-predator ability promotes the diversity of prey species: Critical function analysis , 2012, Biosyst..

[3]  Jülich.  Evolutionary Cycling in Predator – Prey Interactions : Population Dynamics and the Red Queen , 1994 .

[4]  Stefan A H Geritz,et al.  Evolutionary branching and long-term coexistence of cycling predators: critical function analysis. , 2007, Theoretical Population Biology.

[5]  P. Abrams,et al.  Fitness minimization and dynamic instability as a consequence of predator-prey coevolution , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[6]  Eva Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionary branching of virulence in a single-infection model. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  Éva Kisdi,et al.  Trade-off geometries and the adaptive dynamics of two co-evolving species , 2006 .

[8]  Y. Kuang.  Delay Differential Equations: With Applications in Population Dynamics , 2012 .

[9]  L. Ginzburg,et al.  The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Trade‐Off Geometries and Frequency‐Dependent Selection , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Jian Zu,et al.  The evolution of phenotypic traits in a predator-prey system subject to Allee effect. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  T. V. Van Dooren,et al.  The Evolution of Resource Specialization through Frequency‐Dependent and Frequency‐Independent Mechanisms , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[13]  B. Grant,et al.  Unpredictable Evolution in a 30-Year Study of Darwin's Finches , 2002, Science.

[14]  O. Leimar.  Multidimensional convergence stability , 2009 .

[15]  B. Perthame,et al.  The dynamics of adaptation: an illuminating example and a Hamilton-Jacobi approach. , 2005, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  The Evolution of Resource Adaptation: How Generalist and Specialist Consumers Evolve , 2006, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[17]  Andrew White,et al.  The geometric theory of adaptive evolution: trade-off and invasion plots. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[18]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Dynamics of Adaptation and Evolutionary Branching , 1997 .

[19]  P. Amarasekare.  Interference competition and species coexistence , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionary branching under asymmetric competition. , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionary branching/speciation: contrasting results from systems with explicit or emergent carrying capacities , 2003 .

[22]  T. Vincent,et al.  ORGANIZATION OF PREDATOR‐PREY COMMUNITIES AS AN EVOLUTIONARY GAME , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  Hiroyuki Matsuda,et al.  Timid Consumers: Self-Extinction Due to Adaptive Change in Foraging and Anti-predator Effort , 1994 .

[24]  M. Tobler,et al.  Convergent Patterns of Body Shape Differentiation in Four Different Clades of Poeciliid Fishes Inhabiting Sulfide Springs , 2011, Evolutionary Biology.

[25]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation Caused by Different Types of Ecological Interactions , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[26]  I. Eshel.  Evolutionary and continuous stability , 1983 .

[27]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[28]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[29]  Ross Cressman,et al.  CSS, NIS and dynamic stability for two-species behavioral models with continuous trait spaces. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  On evolution under asymmetric competition , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[31]  Hiroyuki Matsuda,et al.  Effects of adaptive predatory and anti-predator behaviour in a two-prey—one-predator system , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.

[32]  D. E. Matthews.  Evolution and the Theory of Games , 1977 .

[33]  Odo Diekmann,et al.  When does evolution optimize , 2008 .

[34]  F. B. Christiansen.  On Conditions for Evolutionary Stability for a Continuously Varying Character , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[35]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[36]  M. Mimura,et al.  Evolutionary branching and evolutionarily stable coexistence of predator species: Critical function analysis. , 2011, Mathematical biosciences.

[37]  Stefan A. H. Geritz,et al.  Resident-invader dynamics and the coexistence of similar strategies , 2005, Journal of mathematical biology.

[38]  J. Metz,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. , 1999, Theoretical population biology.

[39]  R. Bowers,et al.  Adaptive dynamics of Lotka-Volterra systems with trade-offs: the role of interspecific parameter dependence in branching. , 2005, Mathematical biosciences.

[40]  T. V. Van Dooren,et al.  Adaptive walks on changing landscapes: Levins' approach extended. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[41]  A. White,et al.  The influence of trade-off shape on evolutionary behaviour in classical ecological scenarios. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  Y. Takeuchi,et al.  Existence and bifurcation of stable equilibrium in two-prey, one-predator communities , 1983 .

[43]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  The Dynamical Theory of Coevolution : A Derivation from Stochastic Ecological Processes , 1996 .

[44]  Martijn Egas,et al.  Evolution Restricts the Coexistence of Specialists and Generalists: The Role of Trade‐off Structure , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[45]  P. Abrams.  Life History and the Relationship Between Food Availability and Foraging Effort , 1991 .

[46]  G. Fox.  Assortative Mating and Plant Phenology: Evolutionary and Practical Consequences , 2003 .

[47]  D. Schluter.  Experimental Evidence That Competition Promotes Divergence in Adaptive Radiation , 1994, Science.