Nanoscale Modulation of the Pore Dimensions, Size Distribution and Structure of a new Polysulfone-Based High-Flux Dialysis Membrane

Current haemodialysis therapy modalities such as haemodiafiltration enhance the removal of larger uraemic solutes from the blood of patients on end-stage renal disease. A number of clinical investigations have demonstrated the clinical benefits of such therapies in contributing towards better patient survival rates and an improved quality of life. A fundamental prerequisite to the application of convective treatment modalities is the availability of appropriate, technologically-advanced high-flux dialysis membranes that are able to eliminate larger uraemic substances with high efficiency but without causing an excessive leakage of useful proteins. A new membrane, Helixone®, has been developed specifically to meet the present-day requirements of high-flux dialysis and haemodiafiltration therapies involving large substitution rates. The application of nanotechnology fabrication principles and procedures has enabled the development of a membrane having highly-defined inner, separating layer surface structures that offer minimal resistance to the removal of large molecular weight substances across the membrane; for the first time, pore size dimensions, pore size distribution and pore geometry have been modulated and controlled at the nanoscale level for Helixone®. This paper describes the characterisation of the essential structure- and permeation-related parameters of the new membrane using a number of physical analytical techniques.

[1]  A. Cheung,et al.  The hemodialysis membranes: a historical perspective, current state and future prospect. , 1997, Seminars in nephrology.

[2]  W. Hörl Are new toxins appearing on the horizon? , 2001, Contributions to nephrology.

[3]  Shin-ichi Nakao,et al.  Determination of pore size and pore size distribution: 3. Filtration membranes , 1994 .

[4]  M J Lysaght,et al.  Effect of membrane composition and structure on solute removal and biocompatibility in hemodialysis. , 1999, Kidney international.

[5]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Relationship of dialysis membrane and cause-specific mortality. , 1999, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[6]  M. Mulder Characterisation of Membranes , 1991 .

[7]  M Arakawa,et al.  A new form of amyloid protein associated with chronic hemodialysis was identified as beta 2-microglobulin. , 1985, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[8]  C. Ronco,et al.  Dialysis membranes in convective treatments. , 2000, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[9]  R. Wolfe,et al.  Trends in treatment and survival for hemodialysis patients in the United States. , 1998, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[10]  A. Cheung,et al.  Effect of dialysis membranes and middle molecule removal on chronic hemodialysis patient survival. , 1999, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[11]  Willy Lornoy,et al.  Remarkable Removal of Beta-2-Microglobulin by On-Line Hemodiafiltration , 1998, American Journal of Nephrology.

[12]  R. Fischer,et al.  Clinical manifestations of AB-amyloidosis: effects of biocompatibility and flux. , 2000, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[13]  Claudio Ronco,et al.  Does Nanotechnology Apply to Dialysis? , 2001, Blood Purification.

[14]  R. Vanholder,et al.  Redesigning the map of uremic toxins. , 2001, Contributions to nephrology.

[15]  I Ledebo,et al.  Principles and practice of hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration. , 1998, Artificial organs.

[16]  R. Vanholder,et al.  Pathophysiologic effects of uremic retention solutes. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[17]  C Ronco,et al.  Hemodiafiltration with online regeneration of the ultrafiltrate. , 2000, Kidney international. Supplement.

[18]  C. Ronco,et al.  Factors Affecting Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis Efficiency , 2001, Seminars in dialysis.