Disordered sensorimotor transformations for reaching following posterior cortical lesions

Preparation for reaches to visual targets depends on sensorimotor transformations (SMT) between target and limb coordinate systems. To examine neural substrates for SMT, we studied 19 individuals with focal lesions of the visual association cortices and white matter and 11 control subjects without brain lesions. SMT were assessed by measuring accuracy of reaches to remembered locations of visually presented targets. Results showed abnormally large SMT errors in all individuals with inferior parietal lobule (IPL) lesions and some subjects with lesions of the temporo-occipital regions and in occipital area 19. Types of abnormal errors (direction or distance) varied between subjects with similar lesions, e.g. IPL. Patterns of abnormality included dissociations of distance and direction errors and of constant and variable errors. These findings are compatible with the hypothesis of different systems for guiding distance and direction of reaches distributed among structures in superior and inferior visual association cortex.

[1]  Julie Messier,et al.  Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  A. Milner,et al.  Spatial Bias in Visually-Guided Reaching and Bisection Following Right Cerebral Stroke , 1994, Cortex.

[3]  Matthew Rizzo,et al.  Reaching with cerebral tunnel vision , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  H. Karnath,et al.  Subjective body orientation in neglect and the interactive contribution of neck muscle proprioception and vestibular stimulation. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Errors in pointing are due to approximations in sensorimotor transformations. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  H. Karnath,et al.  Trunk orientation as the determining factor of the 'contralateral' deficit in the neglect syndrome and as the physical anchor of the internal representation of body orientation in space. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Early stages in a sensorimotor transformation , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[8]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  R. LaMotte,et al.  Defects in accuracy of reaching after removal of posterior parietal cortex in monkeys , 1978, Brain Research.

[10]  H. Sakata,et al.  Spatial properties of visual fixation neurons in posterior parietal association cortex of the monkey. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  M. Perenin,et al.  Optic Ataxia and Unilateral Neglect: Clinical Evidence for Dissociable Spatial Functions in Posterior Parietal Cortex , 1997 .

[12]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[13]  U Büttner,et al.  Present concepts of oculomotor organization. , 1988, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[14]  M A Goodale,et al.  Kinematic analysis of limb movements in neuropsychological research: subtle deficits and recovery of function. , 1990, Canadian journal of psychology.

[15]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Representing spatial information for limb movement: role of area 5 in the monkey. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  R. J. Frank,et al.  Three-dimensional in vivo mapping of brain lesions in humans. , 1992, Archives of neurology.

[18]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Horizontal and vertical components of head movement are controlled by distinct neural circuits in the barn owl , 1990, Nature.

[19]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  H. Sakata,et al.  The TINS Lecture The parietal association cortex in depth perception and visual control of hand action , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  J. Büttner-Ennever.  Neuroanatomy of the oculomotor system , 1988 .

[22]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Visuomotor Transformations for Reaching to Memorized Targets: A PET Study , 1997, NeuroImage.

[23]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A kinematic analysis of reaching and grasping movements in a patient recovering from optic ataxia , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  H. Sakata,et al.  Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex , 1994, Neuroreport.

[25]  M. Goodale.  Hemispheric differences in motor control , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[26]  Donald G. Stein,et al.  Effects of posterior parietal lesions on visually guided behavior in monkeys , 1978, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  R. Andersen.  Encoding of intention and spatial location in the posterior parietal cortex. , 1995, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  Jürgen Konczak,et al.  Kinematics of goal-directed arm movements in neglect: Control of hand in space , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Two basic properties of space representation in the brain: evidence from unilateral neglect. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[30]  A. H. Norris,et al.  Speed and accuracy of movement and their changes with age. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[31]  A. Damasio,et al.  Lesion analysis in neuropsychology , 1989 .

[32]  Masud Husain,et al.  Reaching movements may reveal the distorted topography of spatial representations after neglect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Impairment of grasping movements following a bilateral posterior parietal lesion , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  P. Grobstein,et al.  Neuronal organization underlying visually elicited prey orienting in the frog—I. Effects of various unilateral lesions , 1987, Neuroscience.

[35]  M. Berkinblit,et al.  Two paradoxes of pointing , 1992, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[37]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.