Use of the Brucella melitensis Native Hapten To Diagnose Brucellosis in Goats by a Rapid, Simple, and Specific Fluorescence Polarization Assay

ABSTRACT The performance of the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) using the recently described Brucella melitensis native hapten and the Brucella abortus O-polysaccharide tracer was evaluated and compared with those of The World Organization for Animal Health tests related to indirect and competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays as classification variables for goat sera obtained from a high-prevalence area where vaccination was performed; test series were also evaluated to increase the final specificity of the tests. Our results showed that the respective relative sensitivity and specificity were 99.7% and 32.5% for the rose Bengal test with a 3% cell concentration (RBT3), 92.8% and 68.8% for the rose Bengal test with 8% cell concentration (RBT8), 98.4% and 84.9% for the Canadian complement fixation test (CFT), 83.7% and 65.5% for the Mexican CFT, 98.4% and 81.0% for the buffered plate agglutination test (BPAT), and 78.1% and 89.3% for the fluorescence polarization assay (FPA). The use of the FPA as the secondary test significantly increased the final specificities of test combinations; the screening tests BPAT, RBT3, and RBT8 plus FPA resulted in 90%, 91.2%, and 91.3% final specificities, respectively, whereas for the combinations RBT3 plus Mexican CFT, RBT8 plus Mexican CFT, and BPAT plus Canadian CFT, the specificities were 65.5%, 63.2%, and 91.7%, respectively. The results suggested that the FPA may be routinely applied as an adaptable screening test for diagnosis of goat brucellosis, since its cutoff can be adjusted to improve its sensitivity or specificity, it is a rapid and simple test, it can be the test of choice when specificity is relevant or when an alternative confirmatory test is not available, and it is not affected by vaccination, thus reducing the number of goats wrongly slaughtered due to misdiagnosis.

[1]  C. Rodríguez-Padilla,et al.  Improved performance of Brucella melitensis native hapten over Brucella abortus OPS tracer on goat antibody detection by the fluorescence polarization assay. , 2008, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[2]  E. Petridou,et al.  Validation of a fluorescence polarization assay (FPA) performed in microplates and comparison with other tests used for diagnosing B. melitensis infection in sheep and goats. , 2007, Journal of immunological methods.

[3]  C. Rodríguez-Padilla,et al.  Application of the Fluorescence Polarization Assay for Detection of Caprine Antibodies to Brucella melitensis in Areas of High Prevalence and Widespread Vaccination , 2007, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[4]  C. Rodríguez-Padilla,et al.  Comparison of fluorescence polarization assay with card and complement fixation tests for the diagnosis of goat brucellosis in a high-prevalence area. , 2006, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[5]  Georgios Pappas,et al.  The new global map of human brucellosis. , 2006, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[6]  Raymond J Kim,et al.  Diagnostic testing. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  S. Vázquez,et al.  Evaluation of serological tests for detection of caprine antibody to Brucella melitensis , 2005 .

[8]  F. Biancifiori,et al.  Comparison of serological tests for the detection of ovine and caprine antibody to Brucella melitensis. , 2004, Revue scientifique et technique.

[9]  R. M. Edelsten Techniques for the brucellosis laboratory , 1989, Veterinary Research Communications.

[10]  K. Nielsen Diagnosis of brucellosis by serology. , 2002, Veterinary microbiology.

[11]  K. Nielsen,et al.  FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION ASSAY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF BRUCELLOSIS: A REVIEW , 2001, Journal of immunoassay & immunochemistry.

[12]  F. Biancifiori,et al.  Assessment of a monoclonal antibody-based competitive enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for diagnosis of brucellosis in infected and Rev. 1 vaccinated sheep and goats. , 2000, The new microbiologica.

[13]  M. Jolley,et al.  A homogeneous fluorescence polarization assay for detection of antibody to Brucella abortus. , 1996, Journal of immunological methods.

[14]  R. Díaz,et al.  Evaluation of serological tests for diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection of goats , 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[15]  B. Garin‐Bastuji,et al.  Efficacy of different Rose Bengal and complement fixation antigens for the diagnosis of Brucella melitensis infection in sheep and goats , 1994, Veterinary Record.

[16]  E. Moreno,et al.  Comparative analysis of Brucella serotype A and M and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 polysaccharides for serological diagnosis of brucellosis in cattle, sheep, and goats , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[17]  M. Zweig,et al.  Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[18]  B. Drasar,et al.  Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification. , 1992, The Journal of tropical medicine and hygiene.

[19]  D. Bundle,et al.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for differentiation of the antibody response of cattle naturally infected with Brucella abortus or vaccinated with strain 19. , 1989, American journal of veterinary research.

[20]  J. Kolář Control of Brucella melitensis brucellosis in developing countries. , 1987, Annales de l'Institut Pasteur. Microbiology.

[21]  R. Díaz,et al.  A simple method for the extraction of polysaccharide B from Brucella cells for use in the radial immunodiffusion test diagnosis of bovine brucellosis. , 1981, Annales de recherches veterinaires. Annals of veterinary research.

[22]  R. Díaz,et al.  Radial immunodiffusion test with a Brucella polysaccharide antigen for differentiating infected from vaccinated cattle , 1979, Journal of clinical microbiology.