Just Blowing Smoke? Residents’ Social Construction of Communication about Wildfire

This study uses social constructionism as a basis for understanding the effectiveness of communication about wildfire risk between agency officials and wildland–urban interface (WUI) residents. Risk communication literature demonstrates a well-documented difference in the way land managers and stakeholders conceptualize risk. This is especially true of fire because management of these hazards have changed so drastically in past decades; fire managers have typically struggled to clearly articulate the current management policy to the public or integrate their specific knowledge in the risk management process. This study contributes to an understanding of how WUI residents construct communication about wildland fire and agency effectiveness in communicating the new era of fire inclusion. Specifically, we explore the personal and professional sources of information residents’ use to understand their fire risk and the subjects they would like more information about. We also explore the continued viability of Smokey Bear, the most enduring symbol of fire management.

[1]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[2]  Toddi A. Steelman,et al.  Is Wildfire Policy in the United States Sustainable? , 2007 .

[3]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[4]  K. Widaman,et al.  The risk perceptions and policy response toward wildland fire hazards by urban home-owners , 1987 .

[5]  Jonathan G. Taylor,et al.  Public Support for Fire-Management Policies , 1984 .

[6]  Bruce Shindler,et al.  Fuel Reduction Strategies in Forest Communities: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2003 .

[7]  Lucas S. Bair,et al.  Prescribed Fire and Public Support: Knowledge Gained, Attitudes Changed in Florida , 2001, Journal of Forestry.

[8]  Keith M. Reynolds,et al.  Modelling public support for wildland fire policy. , 2007 .

[9]  Katherine A. McComas,et al.  Defining Moments in Risk Communication Research: 1996–2005 , 2006, Journal of health communication.

[10]  Michael J. Palenchar,et al.  Another Part of the Risk Communication Model: Analysis of Communication Processes and Message Content , 2002 .

[11]  M. Douglas Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory , 1994 .

[12]  Michael J. Palenchar,et al.  Community Relations and Risk Communication: A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Emergency Response Messages , 2000 .

[13]  Donal Carbaugh “Just listen”: “Listening” and landscape among the blackfeet , 1999 .

[14]  Michael J. Palenchar,et al.  Strategic risk communication: Adding value to society , 2007 .

[15]  James D. Absher,et al.  Salient value similarity, social trust, and attitudes toward wildland fire management strategies , 2007 .

[16]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[17]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[19]  Vincent T. Covello,et al.  Risk Communication: An Emerging Area of Health Communication Research , 1992 .

[20]  Susan I. Stewart,et al.  Defining the Wildland-Urban Interface , 2007 .

[21]  Mark W. Brunson,et al.  Fire and Fuel Management Communication Strategies: Citizen Evaluations of Agency Outreach Activities , 2006 .

[22]  Steven Allison-Bunnell,et al.  Flames in Our Forest: Disaster or Renewal? , 2002 .

[23]  Jo Ellen Force,et al.  Hands-on Learning: Its Effectiveness in Teaching the Public about Wildland Fire , 2003, Journal of Forestry.

[24]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[25]  Keith M. Reynolds,et al.  Sustainable Forestry: From Monitoring and Modelling to Knowledge Management and Policy Science , 2007 .

[26]  Melissa Zaksek,et al.  Toward Improved Communication about Wildland Fire: Mental Models Research to Identify Information Needs for Natural Resource Management , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Examining Social Trust in Fuels Management Strategies , 2004, Journal of Forestry.

[28]  Samuel P. Hays,et al.  Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920 , 1960 .

[29]  P. Slovic Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk‐Assessment Battlefield , 1999, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[30]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  Fighting Fire with Education: What Is the Best Way to Reach Out to Homeowners? , 2004, Journal of Forestry.

[31]  P. Hessburg,et al.  An environmental narrative of Inland Northwest United States forests, 1800–2000 , 2003 .

[32]  Sarah McCaffrey,et al.  The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers , 2006 .

[33]  Richard E. Morehouse,et al.  Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophical and Practical Guide , 1994 .

[34]  S. Daniels,et al.  Working Through Environmental Conflict: The Collaborative Learning Approach , 2001 .

[35]  M. Brunson,et al.  Geographic Variation in Social Acceptability of Wildland Fuels Management in the Western United States , 2004 .

[36]  Year of the Fires: The Story of the Great Fires of 1910 , 2001 .

[37]  Robert L. Heath,et al.  Risk Communication , 1997 .