The value of time in biological conservation and supplied ecosystem services: A willingness to give up time exercise

Abstract This study was motivated by the necessity to develop social but not necessarily monetary techniques to characterize the connections between ecological processes and society. Given this goal, we analyzed social support for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service delivery in semi-arid environments in Spain, based on the willingness to give up time. We took into consideration different types of conservation activities and different ecosystem service categories. In addition, we explored the effect of the respondent's place of residence and gender. Overall, the satisfaction of conserving species continues to be the prominent driving force in engaging public support for conservation programs over ecosystem services. However, we found significant differences by place of residence and gender, with implications for the promotion of social engagement. Urban respondents were particularly interested in allocating time to activities associated with protected-area programs, while rural inhabitants were willing to engage in activities related to cultural services. With respect to gender, women were highly motivated to support activities that enhance rural areas. The results show that the willingness to give up time reflects socio-cultural factors behind consumer preferences. In addition, its application could promote collaborative work and strengthen community values and beliefs.

[1]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Special issue: The Iberian Southeast , 2011 .

[2]  J. García‐Ruiz,et al.  Hydrological and erosive consequences of farmland abandonment in Europe, with special reference to the Mediterranean region – A review , 2011 .

[3]  Steven A. Murphy,et al.  The Nature Relatedness Scale , 2009 .

[4]  Virginia Fernández Aguinaco.  Despacio, despacio... 20 razones para ir más lentos por la vida, de María Novo , 2010 .

[5]  J. C. Bonald.  Somos el tiempo que nos queda , 2004 .

[6]  W. Greene.  Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: Comment , 1981 .

[7]  R. Costanza,et al.  Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  H. Moschitz,et al.  The challenges of innovation for sustainable agriculture and rural development: Integrating local actions into European policies with the Reflective Learning Methodology , 2014 .

[9]  B. Ridder.  Questioning the ecosystem services argument for biodiversity conservation , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[10]  G. Daily,et al.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity , 2012, Nature.

[11]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Minimizing the cost of environmental management decisions by optimizing statistical thresholds , 2004 .

[12]  C. Dormann,et al.  A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead , 2011 .

[13]  J. Meyerhoff,et al.  Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation , 2006 .

[14]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Exploring the motivations of protesters in contingent valuation: Insights for conservation policies , 2011 .

[15]  Martí Boada,et al.  Land abandonment, landscape, and biodiversity: questioning the restorative character of the forest transition in the Mediterranean , 2015 .

[16]  Rachelle K. Gould,et al.  Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement , 2012 .

[17]  Christian K. Feld,et al.  Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[18]  H. Gerdes,et al.  Mainstreaming ecosystem services through reformed European agricultural policies , 2012 .

[19]  J. Hanspach,et al.  Cultural Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review and Prospects for Future Research , 2013 .

[20]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Factors influencing local ecological knowledge maintenance in Mediterranean watersheds: Insights for environmental policies , 2015, AMBIO.

[21]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[22]  G. Edwards‐Jones,et al.  Towards an ecosystem approach for understanding public values concerning marine biodiversity loss , 2012 .

[23]  Maria Tengö,et al.  Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach , 2014, AMBIO.

[24]  T. Bowyer-Bower,et al.  Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development , 1989 .

[25]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Cities, Information, and Economic Growth , 2016 .

[26]  Tracy A. Dobson,et al.  Conservation and the Social Sciences , 2003 .

[27]  P. Davidar,et al.  Empowering women facilitates conservation , 2010 .

[28]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Reconnecting to the Biosphere , 2011, AMBIO.

[29]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Social preferences towards ecosystem services provided by cloud forests in the neotropics: implications for conservation strategies , 2013, Regional Environmental Change.

[30]  Robert J. Brulle,et al.  Human behavior and sustainability , 2012 .

[31]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Restoring the human capacity for conserving biodiversity: a social–ecological approach , 2015, Sustainability Science.

[32]  Ariel Salleh,et al.  Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. By Vandana Shiva. London: Zed Books, 1989. , 1991, Hypatia.

[33]  C. Avgerou.  The Informational City: Information Technology Economic Restructuring and the Urban Regional Process , 1991 .

[34]  Naeem,et al.  Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis , 2005 .

[35]  N. Grimm,et al.  Global Change and the Ecology of Cities , 2008, Science.

[36]  SCOTT A. FIELD,et al.  OPTIMIZING ALLOCATION OF MONITORING EFFORT UNDER ECONOMIC AND OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS , 2005 .

[37]  Marina García-Llorente,et al.  From supply to social demand: a landscape-scale analysis of the water regulation service , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[38]  I. Fazey,et al.  The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries - evidence from the Solomon Islands , 2011 .

[39]  R. Cowling,et al.  An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  C.Y. Jim,et al.  Resident Motivations and Willingness-to-Pay for Urban Biodiversity Conservation in Guangzhou (China) , 2010, Environmental management.

[41]  J. Heckman.  Sample selection bias as a specification error , 1979 .

[42]  J. Gonzalez,et al.  Uncovering Ecosystem Service Bundles through Social Preferences , 2012, PloS one.

[43]  F. Pugnaire,et al.  Colonization processes in semi-arid Mediterranean old-fields , 2006 .

[44]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region. , 2011 .

[45]  Diego Martino.  Gender and Urban Perceptions of Nature and Protected Areas in Bañados del Este Biosphere Reserve , 2008, Environmental management.

[46]  Langche Zeng,et al.  Analyzing Censored and Sample-Selected Data with Tobit and Heckit Models , 1999, Political Analysis.

[47]  Carlos Montes,et al.  A choice experiment study for land-use scenarios in semi-arid watershed environments , 2012 .

[48]  J. Gonzalez,et al.  Social perceptions of the impacts and benefits of invasive alien species: Implications for management , 2008 .

[49]  Brendan Fisher,et al.  Valuing Ecosystem Services: The Case of Multi-functional Wetlands , 2008 .

[50]  M. Castells,et al.  The Informational City. Information Technology, Economic Restructuring, and the Urban-Regional Process , 1995 .

[51]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. , 2014 .

[52]  A. Huckauf.  Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience , 2008 .