Auction Learning as a Two-Player Game

Designing an incentive compatible auction that maximizes expected revenue is a central problem in Auction Design. While theoretical approaches to the problem have hit some limits, a recent research direction initiated by Duetting et al. (2019) consists in building neural network architectures to find optimal auctions. We propose two conceptual deviations from their approach which result in enhanced performance. First, we use recent results in theoretical auction design to introduce a time-independent Lagrangian. This not only circumvents the need for an expensive hyper-parameter search (as in prior work), but also provides a single metric to compare the performance of two auctions (absent from prior work). Second, the optimization procedure in previous work uses an inner maximization loop to compute optimal misreports. We amortize this process through the introduction of an additional neural network. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by learning competitive or strictly improved auctions compared to prior work. Both results together further imply a novel formulation of Auction Design as a two-player game with stationary utility functions.

[1]  Maria-Florina Balcan,et al.  Sample Complexity of Automated Mechanism Design , 2016, NIPS.

[2]  Xiaohui Bei,et al.  Bayesian incentive compatibility via fractional assignments , 2010, SODA '11.

[3]  Yang Cai,et al.  An Efficient ε-BIC to BIC Transformation and Its Application to Black-Box Reduction in Revenue Maximization , 2021, SODA.

[4]  Xi Chen,et al.  On the Complexity of Simple and Optimal Deterministic Mechanisms for an Additive Buyer , 2018, SODA.

[5]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  Symmetries and optimal multi-dimensional mechanism design , 2012, EC '12.

[6]  Christos Tzamos,et al.  Strong Duality for a Multiple-Good Monopolist , 2014, EC.

[7]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Sampling and Representation Complexity of Revenue Maximization , 2014, WINE.

[8]  Shaddin Dughmi,et al.  Bernoulli factories and black-box reductions in mechanism design , 2017, SECO.

[9]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Deep Learning for Multi-Facility Location Mechanism Design , 2018, IJCAI.

[10]  Robert D. Kleinberg,et al.  Bayesian incentive compatibility via matchings , 2011, SODA '11.

[11]  Sébastien Lahaie,et al.  A Kernel-Based Iterative Combinatorial Auction , 2011, AAAI.

[12]  Frank Hutter,et al.  Decoupled Weight Decay Regularization , 2017, ICLR.

[13]  Alejandro M. Manelli,et al.  Bundling as an optimal selling mechanism for a multiple-good monopolist , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Learning Simple Auctions , 2016, COLT.

[15]  S. Matthew Weinberg,et al.  A Permutation-Equivariant Neural Network Architecture For Auction Design , 2020, AAAI.

[16]  Maria-Florina Balcan,et al.  Mechanism design via machine learning , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[17]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.

[18]  Chenghao Guo,et al.  Settling the sample complexity of single-parameter revenue maximization , 2019, STOC.

[19]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Approximate revenue maximization with multiple items , 2012, EC '12.

[20]  Yang Cai,et al.  A duality-based unified approach to Bayesian mechanism design , 2016, SECO.

[21]  Xi Chen,et al.  The Complexity of Optimal Multidimensional Pricing , 2013, SODA.

[22]  Xi Chen,et al.  On the Complexity of Optimal Lottery Pricing and Randomized Mechanisms , 2015, 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[23]  Christos Tzamos,et al.  The Complexity of Optimal Mechanism Design , 2012, SODA.

[24]  Paul Dütting,et al.  Optimal auctions through deep learning , 2017, ICML.

[25]  Paul Dütting,et al.  Payment Rules through Discriminant-Based Classifiers , 2012, ACM Trans. Economics and Comput..

[26]  David C. Parkes,et al.  Deep Learning for Revenue-Optimal Auctions with Budgets , 2018, AAMAS.

[27]  Brendan Lucier,et al.  Bayesian algorithmic mechanism design , 2010, BQGT.

[28]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  Sample Complexity for Non-Truthful Mechanisms , 2016, EC.

[29]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Making the Most of Your Samples , 2014, EC.

[30]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  On the Pseudo-Dimension of Nearly Optimal Auctions , 2015, NIPS.

[31]  S. H. Hong Optimal Auction Design , 2004 .

[32]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Ironing in the Dark , 2015, EC.

[33]  Mu-ming Poo,et al.  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao: the future of quantum computing , 2018 .