Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography.

OBJECTIVES To determine physical properties of the Digora digital intra-oral radiographic system (Soredex Orion Corporation, Helsinki, Finland) for different calibration settings and beam energies. METHODS The line spread function (LSF) and the modulation transfer function (MTF) were determined from radiographs of a slit. Noise power spectra (NPS) were determined from radiographs exposed to homogeneous radiation fields at 10, 50 and 100% of the calibration exposure for three tube potentials. All calculations were performed using relative values of exposure comprised of gray level, the signal at the photomultiplier tube and the amplified signal in order to confirm agreement between these different approaches. Noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) were calculated from the one-dimensional NPSs and the MTF. Detective quantum efficiencies (DQE) were determined from the NEQs and representative values of the photon fluence. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were calculated for different signal contrasts applying the NEQs. RESULTS The MTF of the system exhibited typical characteristics and falls to a value close to zero at the Nyquist frequency of about 7 cycles/mm. Noise as expressed by the NPS was found to be relatively low, i.e. about 10(-5) to 10(-6) mm2 depending on exposure and frequency. There was no significant difference between data obtained at different beam energies. The NEQ and hence the DQE were relatively high. DQE decreased with increased exposure. For exposures in the clinical range of the DQE reached a peak value of about 25%. SNRs are favorable. CONCLUSION The physical properties of the Digora intra-oral system indicate that it is suitable for digital intra-oral radiography.

[1]  K Horner,et al.  The imaging performance of a storage phosphor system for dental radiography. , 1996, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  F. V. Van Ginkel,et al.  In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film. , 1997, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[3]  A Fenster,et al.  Therapy imaging: a signal-to-noise analysis of metal plate/film detectors. , 1987, Medical physics.

[4]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Absolute measures of physical image quality: measurement and application to radiographic magnification. , 1982, Medical physics.

[5]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Accuracy of caries diagnosis in digital images from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems: an in vitro study. , 1995, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  W. McDavid,et al.  Physical evaluation of a system for direct digital intra-oral radiography based on a charge-coupled device. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[7]  W. McDavid,et al.  Resolution as defined by line spread and modulation transfer functions for four digital intraoral radiographic systems. , 1994, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[8]  H. Messer,et al.  Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography. , 1998, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Accuracy of Radiographic Detection of Residual Caries in Connection with Tunnel Restorations , 1997, Caries Research.

[10]  J T Dobbins,et al.  Performance characteristics of a Kodak computed radiography system. , 1999, Medical physics.

[11]  William Vennart,et al.  ICRU Report 54: Medical imaging—the assessment of image quality: ISBN 0-913394-53-X. April 1996, Maryland, U.S.A. , 1997 .

[12]  U Welander,et al.  Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs. , 1993, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[13]  W Huda,et al.  Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology. , 1997, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[14]  W. McDavid,et al.  Absolute measures of image quality for the Sens-A-Ray direct digital intraoral radiography system. , 1995, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[15]  A Workman,et al.  Physical performance measures of radiographic imaging systems. , 1997, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[16]  W. McDavid,et al.  Dose response of a storage phosphor system for intraoral radiography. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[17]  H. Gröndahl,et al.  Endodontic measurements in digital radiographs acquired by a photostimulable, storage phosphor system. , 1996, Endodontics & dental traumatology.

[18]  Y Hayakawa,et al.  Intraoral radiographic storage phosphor image mean pixel values and signal-to-noise ratio: effects of calibration. , 1998, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[19]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems. , 1985, Medical physics.

[21]  J. Bushberg.  The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging , 2001 .

[22]  D. C. Barber,et al.  Medical Imaging-The Assessment of Image Quality , 1996 .

[23]  Peter G. J. Barten,et al.  Physical model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[24]  Arnold R. Cowen,et al.  Signal, noise and SNR transfer properties of computed radiography , 1993 .

[25]  A. Rose.  The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[26]  H G Gröndahl,et al.  An image plate system for digital intra-oral radiography. , 1996, Dental update.