Effects of posture on electric fields of non-invasive brain stimulation

The brain moves when the orientation of the head changes. This inter-postural motion has been shown to affect the distribution of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). As CSF layer thickness affects the distribution of electric fields (EF) in non-invasive brain stimulation methods such as transcranial direct current (TDCS) and magnetic (TMS) stimulation, possible differences in body position between sessions could affect the stimulation efficacy. Additionally, inter-postural differences might distort the modeling results of TDCS and TMS, as the models are usually built based on magnetic resonance images (MRI) obtained while the subject is in the supine position, whereas the actual stimulation is given while the subject is in an upright position. Here, we studied the effects of changing the position of the subject between supine, prone, and left lateral on the conformation of the brain. This study aimed to determine whether small inter-postural changes in the shape of the brain can affect TDCS and TMS EFs as hypothesized. We obtained MRI from five subjects in each position and used them to build anatomically realistic models for use in finite element simulations of the EFs. Position was found to affect EFs, with them being approximately 10% stronger and more diffuse while subjects were in the prone and left lateral than in the supine positions for TDCS. In TMS, a similar trend was observed, but the effect was smaller, approximately 2%, than that observed for TDCS. Thus, the effect of posture should be considered in the design of TDCS and TMS experiments.

[1]  D. Reato,et al.  Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad , 2009, Brain Stimulation.

[2]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Fast multigrid-based computation of the induced electric field for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Solomon R. Eisenberg,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element method for computing magnetically induced currents in tissues , 1994 .

[4]  M. Bikson,et al.  Computational modeling of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in obesity: Impact of head fat and dose guidelines☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[5]  Axel Thielscher,et al.  On the importance of electrode parameters for shaping electric field patterns generated by tDCS , 2015, NeuroImage.

[6]  Deming Wang,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part II: correction using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  J Silny,et al.  A model of the electrical volume conductor in the region of the eye in the ELF range. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Effects of coil orientation on the electric field induced by TMS over the hand motor area , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  C Gabriel,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Jaakko O. Nieminen,et al.  Coil model comparison for cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2018, Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express.

[11]  S. Hushek,et al.  MRI study of cerebral blood flow and CSF flow dynamics in an upright posture: the effect of posture on the intracranial compliance and pressure. , 2005, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[12]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Spherical Demons: Fast Diffeomorphic Landmark-Free Surface Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  W. Sutherling,et al.  Conductivities of Three-Layer Live Human Skull , 2004, Brain Topography.

[15]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[16]  C. Almli,et al.  Unbiased nonlinear average age-appropriate brain templates from birth to adulthood , 2009, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Specific impedance of rabbit cerebral cortex. , 1963, Experimental neurology.

[18]  C. Gabriel,et al.  Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[20]  A M Dale,et al.  Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Satoshi Tanaka,et al.  Inter-subject Variability in Electric Fields of Motor Cortical tDCS , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[22]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Are current flow models for transcranial electrical stimulation fit for purpose? , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[23]  I. Laakso,et al.  Where and what TMS activates: Experiments and modeling , 2018, Brain Stimulation.

[24]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric properties of mammalian tissues from 0.1 to 100 MHz: a summary of recent data. , 1982, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Computational Artifacts of the In Situ Electric Field in Anatomical Models Exposed to Low-Frequency Magnetic Field , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[26]  Kwang-Hyuk Lee,et al.  Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[27]  A. Angrilli,et al.  Supine posture inhibits cortical activity: Evidence from Delta and Alpha EEG bands , 2016, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  A. Thielscher,et al.  Where does TMS Stimulate the Motor Cortex? Combining Electrophysiological Measurements and Realistic Field Estimates to Reveal the Affected Cortex Position , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: III. Parametric models for the dielectric spectrum of tissues. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  Arno M. Janssen,et al.  The effect of local anatomy on the electric field induced by TMS: evaluation at 14 different target sites , 2014, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[31]  W. Landau,et al.  Some relations between resistivity and electrical activity in the cerebral cortex of the cat. , 1955, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.

[32]  David M. Doddrell,et al.  Geometric distortion in clinical MRI systems Part II: correction using a 3D phantom. , 2004, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[33]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016 , 2016, Brain Stimulation.

[34]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  TMS Motor Thresholds Correlate With TDCS Electric Field Strengths in Hand Motor Area , 2018, Front. Neurosci..

[35]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation , 2015, NeuroImage.

[36]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[37]  Anthony M. Norcia,et al.  In‐vivo measurements of human brain tissue conductivity using focal electrical current injection through intracerebral multicontact electrodes , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[38]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Subject position affects EEG magnitudes , 2013, NeuroImage.

[39]  J. Latikka,et al.  Conductivity of living intracranial tissues. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[40]  Lari M. Koponen,et al.  Experimental Characterization of the Electric Field Distribution Induced by TMS Devices , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[41]  N. Salamon,et al.  Electrical Conductivities of the Freshly Excised Cerebral Cortex in Epilepsy Surgery Patients; Correlation with Pathology, Seizure Duration, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2006, Brain Topography.

[42]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[43]  J. Rothwell,et al.  tDCS changes in motor excitability are specific to orientation of current flow , 2017, Brain Stimulation.

[44]  Anthony T Barker,et al.  The effect of head orientation on subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid distribution and its implications for neurophysiological modulation and recording techniques , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[45]  A. Hasan,et al.  Home Use, Remotely Supervised, and Remotely Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence , 2018, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[46]  S. Watanabe,et al.  Conductivities of epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous tissue at intermediate frequencies , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[47]  David R. Wozny,et al.  The electrical conductivity of human cerebrospinal fluid at body temperature , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  P S Tofts,et al.  The distribution of induced currents in magnetic stimulation of the nervous system. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[49]  Akimasa Hirata,et al.  Electric fields of motor and frontal tDCS in a standard brain space: A computer simulation study , 2016, NeuroImage.

[50]  Alexander Opitz,et al.  Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2013, NeuroImage.