Assessing the facilitators and barriers of interdisciplinary team working in primary care using normalisation process theory: An integrative review

Background Interdisciplinary team working is of paramount importance in the reform of primary care in order to provide cost-effective and comprehensive care. However, international research shows that it is not routine practice in many healthcare jurisdictions. It is imperative to understand levers and barriers to the implementation process. This review examines interdisciplinary team working in practice, in primary care, from the perspective of service providers and analyses 1 barriers and facilitators to implementation of interdisciplinary teams in primary care and 2 the main research gaps. Methods and findings An integrative review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Following a search of 10 international databases, 8,827 titles were screened for relevance and 49 met the criteria. Quality of evidence was appraised using predetermined criteria. Data were analysed following the principles of framework analysis using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT), which has four constructs: sense making, enrolment, enactment, and appraisal. The literature is dominated by a focus on interdisciplinary working between physicians and nurses. There is a dearth of evidence about all NPT constructs apart from enactment. Physicians play a key role in encouraging the enrolment of others in primary care team working and in enabling effective divisions of labour in the team. The experience of interdisciplinary working emerged as a lever for its implementation, particularly where communication and respect were strong between professionals. Conclusion A key lever for interdisciplinary team working in primary care is to get professionals working together and to learn from each other in practice. However, the evidence base is limited as it does not reflect the experiences of all primary care professionals and it is primarily about the enactment of team working. We need to know much more about the experiences of the full network of primary care professionals regarding all aspects of implementation work. Systematic review registration International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015019362.

[1]  B. Primack,et al.  Exploring successful community pharmacist-physician collaborative working relationships using mixed methods. , 2010, Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP.

[2]  W. Miller,et al.  Creating collaborative learning environments for transforming primary care practices now. , 2010, Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare.

[3]  Dan Way,et al.  Family physician/nurse practitioner: stories of collaboration. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[4]  D. Feeny,et al.  Primary health care teams: team members' perceptions of the collaborative process , 2004, Journal of interprofessional care.

[5]  R. Perera,et al.  Adaptation and validation of the Charlson Index for Read/OXMIS coded databases , 2010, BMC family practice.

[6]  L. Letts,et al.  The integration of occupational therapy into primary care: a multiple case study design , 2013, BMC Family Practice.

[7]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  RCGP Quality Team Development programme: an illuminative evaluation , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[8]  Connie Van,et al.  General practitioner–pharmacist interactions in professional pharmacy services , 2011, Journal of interprofessional care.

[9]  M. Harris,et al.  Finding common ground? Evaluating an intervention to improve teamwork among primary health-care professionals. , 2010, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[10]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Establishing the contribution of nursing in the community to the health of the people of Scotland: integrative literature review. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  F. Mair,et al.  A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes , 2014, Implementation Science.

[12]  Peter Mendel,et al.  Implementation of the CALM intervention for anxiety disorders: a qualitative study , 2012, Implementation Science.

[13]  D. Moher,et al.  Developing integrative primary healthcare delivery: adding a chiropractor to the team. , 2008, Explore.

[14]  J. George,et al.  Integration of pharmacists into general practice clinics in Australia: the views of general practitioners and pharmacists , 2014, The International journal of pharmacy practice.

[15]  G. Dinant,et al.  Family physicians’ diagnostic gut feelings are measurable: construct validation of a questionnaire , 2013, BMC Family Practice.

[16]  A. B. de Sá,et al.  [Family Health Reform in Portugal: analysis of its implementation]. , 2011, Ciencia & saude coletiva.

[17]  Ashley N. Castleberry NVivo 10 [software program]. Version 10. QSR International; 2012. , 2014, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[18]  C. Fouché,et al.  Atypical Alliances: The Potential for Social Work and Pharmacy Collaborations in Primary Health Care Delivery , 2013, Social work in health care.

[19]  M. J. Marin,et al.  [The community health agent and working as a team: the easy and difficult aspects]. , 2011, Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P.

[20]  U. Lindblad,et al.  Advanced practice nurses: A new resource for Swedish primary health-care teams , 2011 .

[21]  K. Lowton,et al.  What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review. , 2008, International journal of nursing studies.

[22]  Stephen M Shortell,et al.  A taxonomy of accountable care organizations for policy and practice. , 2014, Health services research.

[23]  K. Stange,et al.  Journey to the Patient-Centered Medical Home: A Qualitative Analysis of the Experiences of Practices in the National Demonstration Project , 2010, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[24]  Eric S Holmboe,et al.  How teams work--or don't--in primary care: a field study on internal medicine practices. , 2010, Health affairs.

[25]  Douglas R. Wilson,et al.  Family physicians’ interest and involvement in interdisciplinary collaborative practice in Alberta, Canada , 2005, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[26]  R. Byng,et al.  People and teams matter in organizational change: professionals' and managers' experiences of changing governance and incentives in primary care. , 2014, Health services research.

[27]  Elisabet Cedersund,et al.  Discursive patterns in multiprofessional healthcare teams. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[28]  C. Lemay,et al.  Developing and measuring progress toward collaborative, integrated, interdisciplinary health care teams , 2004, Journal of interprofessional care.

[29]  S. Chreim,et al.  Role construction and boundaries in interprofessional primary health care teams: a qualitative study , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[30]  S. Pullon,et al.  Primary health care in New Zealand: the impact of organisational factors on teamwork. , 2009, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[31]  L. Naccarella General practitioner networks matter in primary health care team service provision , 2009 .

[32]  C. Feifer,et al.  Implementing change in primary care practices using electronic medical records: a conceptual framework , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[33]  A. Booth,et al.  Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work , 2013, Human Resources for Health.

[34]  S. Dahrouge,et al.  Integration of nurse practitioners into a family health network. , 2007, The Canadian nurse.

[35]  Staci A. Young Professional Relationships and Power Dynamics Between Urban Community‐Based Nurses and Social Work Case Managers: Advocacy in Action , 2009, Professional case management.

[36]  Jeremy Grimshaw,et al.  Engaging primary care practitioners in quality improvement: making explicit the program theory of an interprofessional education intervention , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[37]  A. MacFarlane,et al.  Primary care teams in Ireland: a qualitative mapping review of Irish grey and published literature , 2015, Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -).

[38]  D. Moher,et al.  Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Physical therapy.

[39]  John Ashmore,et al.  ‘Going private’: a qualitative comparison of medical specialists’ job satisfaction in the public and private sectors of South Africa , 2013, Human Resources for Health.

[40]  R. Mannion,et al.  How managed a market? Modes of commissioning in England and Germany , 2013, BMC Health Services Research.

[41]  Thomas Bodenheimer,et al.  In Search of Joy in Practice: A Report of 23 High-Functioning Primary Care Practices , 2013, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[42]  Investigating characteristics of collaboration between nurse practitioners and medical practitioners in primary healthcare: a mixed methods multiple case study protocol. , 2014, Journal of advanced nursing.

[43]  Jo Rycroft-Malone,et al.  Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges , 2008, Implementation science : IS.

[44]  Michael E Matheny,et al.  Time-series and risk-adjusted control charts , 2013, Implementation Science.

[45]  S. Mickan,et al.  Collaborative practice in a global health context: Common themes from developed and developing countries , 2010, Journal of interprofessional care.

[46]  H. Snooks,et al.  It could be a ‘Golden Goose’: a qualitative study of views in primary care on an emergency admission risk prediction tool prior to implementation , 2016, BMC Family Practice.

[47]  M. Pozzebon,et al.  The implementation evaluation of primary care groups of practice: a focus on organizational identity , 2010, BMC family practice.

[48]  R. Phillips,et al.  Primary care and why it matters for U.S. health system reform. , 2010, Health affairs.

[49]  J. Dale,et al.  Interprofessional relationships and communication in primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework. , 2008, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[50]  J. Mullett,et al.  Community-based participatory action research: transforming multidisciplinary practice in primary health care. , 2007, Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health.

[51]  Jackie Jane Churchman,et al.  Nurses' views on challenging doctors' practice in an acute hospital. , 2010, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[52]  R. Whittemore,et al.  The integrative review: updated methodology. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[53]  B. Sibbald,et al.  The challenge of integrating community pharmacists into the primary health care team: A case study of local pharmaceutical services (LPS) pilots and interprofessional collaboration , 2008, Journal of interprofessional care.

[54]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[55]  Douglas Norton,et al.  Team effectiveness in primary care networks in Alberta. , 2010, Healthcare quarterly.

[56]  S. Shaw More than one dollop of cortex: Patients' experiences of interprofessional care at an urban family health centre , 2008, Journal of interprofessional care.

[57]  C. May,et al.  Do primary care professionals agree about progress with implementation of primary care teams: results from a cross sectional study , 2016, BMC Family Practice.

[58]  K. Peters,et al.  Clinical placements in Australian general practice: (Part 1) the experiences of pre-registration nursing students. , 2015, Nurse education in practice.

[59]  Shannan L. Neubauer,et al.  Integration of a primary healthcare pharmacist , 2010, Journal of interprofessional care.

[60]  G. Moore,et al.  Transforming Care Teams to Provide the Best Possible Patient‐Centered, Collaborative Care , 2009, The Journal of ambulatory care management.

[61]  Donald R. Martin,et al.  Point Counterpoint: The Function of Contradictions on an Interdisciplinary Health Care Team , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[62]  M. J. Kim,et al.  Multidisciplinary teamwork in US primary health care. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[63]  S. Iliffe,et al.  Tearing down the Berlin wall: social workers' perspectives on joint working with general practice. , 2005, Family practice.

[64]  L. Poghosyan,et al.  Practice environments and job satisfaction and turnover intentions of nurse practitioners: Implications for primary care workforce capacity , 2017, Health care management review.

[65]  C. Hughes,et al.  Factors affecting collaboration between general practitioners and community pharmacists: a qualitative study , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[66]  A. V. van Raak,et al.  Can we make sense of multidisciplinary co-operation in primary care by considering routines and rules? , 2011, Health & social care in the community.

[67]  A. Gardner,et al.  Views and experiences of nurse practitioners and medical practitioners with collaborative practice in primary health care – an integrative review , 2013, BMC Family Practice.

[68]  N. Drummond,et al.  Interprofessional primary care in academic family medicine clinics: implications for education and training. , 2012, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[69]  N. Gale,et al.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[70]  Rebecca S. Etz,et al.  How Team-Based Reflection Affects Quality Improvement Implementation: A Qualitative Study , 2012, Quality management in health care.

[71]  A. B. Ford,et al.  Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge , 1970 .

[72]  B. Crabtree,et al.  Physicians as Inclusive Leaders: Insights From a Participatory Quality Improvement Intervention , 2012, Quality management in health care.

[73]  Adrienne Shaw,et al.  Do primary care professionals work as a team: A qualitative study , 2005, Journal of interprofessional care.

[74]  Chris Keyworth,et al.  Better together? a naturalistic qualitative study of inter-professional working in collaborative care for co-morbid depression and physical health problems , 2013, Implementation Science.

[75]  Sharon Hillege,et al.  Nurse practitioners' experiences of working collaboratively with general practitioners and allied health professionals in New South Wales, Australia. , 2005, The Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation.

[76]  J. Barnsley,et al.  The difference between integration and collaboration in patient care: results from key informant interviews working in multiprofessional health care teams. , 2009, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[77]  C. O’Donnell,et al.  Learning from doing: the case for combining normalisation process theory and participatory learning and action research methodology for primary healthcare implementation research , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[78]  Barbara Korabek,et al.  Home Care/Physician Partnerships in the Community: A Canadian Model in Development , 2004 .

[79]  Roman Kislov,et al.  Managing boundaries in primary care service improvement: A developmental approach to communities of practice , 2012, Implementation Science.

[80]  Difficulties Encountered in Collaborative Care: Logistics Trumps Desire , 2012, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[81]  Marcia Smith,et al.  Towards Interdisciplinary Community Collaboration and Development , 2007 .

[82]  L. Joly Directly observed therapy and tuberculosis: how can a systematic review of qualitative research contribute to improving services? A qualitative meta-synthesis , 2007 .

[83]  Jesse C. Crosson,et al.  Using Learning Teams for Reflective Adaptation (ULTRA): Insights From a Team-Based Change Management Strategy in Primary Care , 2010, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[84]  L. Lapointe,et al.  Diffusion of a collaborative care model in primary care: a longitudinal qualitative study , 2013, BMC Family Practice.

[85]  B. Mash,et al.  How to manage organisational change and create practice teams: experiences of a South African primary care health centre. , 2008, Education for health.

[86]  C. May,et al.  Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory , 2009 .

[87]  C. van Weel,et al.  Health Care in The Netherlands , 2012, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[88]  Mary O'Neill,et al.  Partners in care: investigating community nurses' understanding of an interdisciplinary team-based approach to primary care. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.