Multi-Criteria Analysis of Input Use in Agriculture

In this paper we present a methodology for the analysis of input use in the agricultural sector. The novelty of the theoretical model described here is that it has been developed considering a multi‐criteria environment. Thus, the optimal input use condition is determined by evaluating “multi‐attribute utility” and “multi‐attribute marginal utility”. We show how the approach adopted in this paper is a generalisation of the single‐attribute expected utility theory. The theoretical model developed is thereafter implemented in an empirical application that studies water for irrigation use as a particular case. The results show how multi‐attribute utility functions elicited for a sample of 52 irrigators explain differences in irrigation water use in relatively homogeneous agricultural systems, albeit exhibiting dissimilar partial utility functions for water use. We conclude that these differences come from the dissimilar weights that farmers attach to each attribute in the aggregate utility function.

[1]  B. V. Tew,et al.  An Economic Examination of an Integrated Pest Management Production System with a Contrast Between E-V and Stochastic Dominance Analysis , 1981, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[2]  B. Babcock,et al.  Input Demand Under Yield and Revenue Insurance , 1996 .

[3]  Steve Harrison,et al.  Validation of multicriteria analysis models , 1999 .

[4]  David J. Pannell,et al.  Impacts of risk aversion on whole-farm management in Syria , 1998 .

[5]  Laura Riesgo,et al.  An MCDM analysis of agricultural risk aversion , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  J. Wolgin.  Resource Allocation and Risk: A Case Study of Smallholder Agriculture in Kenya , 1975 .

[7]  D. Oglethorpe.  SENSITIVITY OF FARM PLANS UNDER RISK-AVERSE BEHAVIOUR: A NOTE ON THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS , 1995 .

[8]  R. Huirne,et al.  A Multi-Attribute Utility Model to Optimise Sow Replacement Decisions , 1998 .

[9]  T. Wiens.  Peasant Risk Aversion and Allocative Behavior: A Quadratic Programming Experiment , 1976 .

[10]  Carlos Romero,et al.  On farmers' objectives: A multi-criteria approach , 1997 .

[11]  J. A. Gómez-Limón,et al.  Local Water Markets for Irrigation in Southern Spain: A Multicriteria Approach , 2002 .

[12]  J. H. Ward.  Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[13]  José A. Gómez-Limón,et al.  Irrigation water pricing: differential impacts on irrigated farms , 2004 .

[14]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Multiplicative Utility Functions , 1974, Oper. Res..

[15]  A. Sandmo.  On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty , 1971 .

[16]  Howard D. Leathers,et al.  Interactions between Agricultural and Resource Policy: The Importance of Attitudes toward Risk , 1991 .

[17]  M. J. McGregor,et al.  Farmers' objectives and their interactions with business and life styles: evidence from Berkshire, England. , 1994 .

[18]  C. B. Baker,et al.  Marginal Risk Constraint Linear Program for Activity Analysis , 1974 .

[19]  J. Cary,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS AMONG FARMERS' GOALS AND FARM ADJUSTMENT STRATEGIES: SOME EMPIRICS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH , 1982 .

[20]  Economic and Water Quality Impacts of Reducing Nitrogen and Pesticide Use in Agriculture , 1997, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[21]  R. Gasson.  GOALS AND VALUES OF FARMERS , 1973 .

[22]  L. Robison.  An Appraisal of Expected Utility Hypothesis Tests Constructed from Responses to Hypothetical Questions and Experimental Choices , 1982 .

[23]  P. Schoemaker.  The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations , 1982 .

[24]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Unit weighting schemes for decision making , 1975 .

[25]  R. Dawes.  Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[26]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Risk Modeling Using Direct Solution of Nonlinear Approximations of the Utility Function , 1985 .

[27]  R. Just,et al.  Production Function Estimation and Related Risk Considerations , 1979 .

[28]  C. Starmer.  Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk , 2000 .

[29]  J. Kliebenstein,et al.  Energy-Related Input Demand by Crop Producers , 1983, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[30]  H. Herath.  An empirical evaluation of multiattribute utility theory in peasant agriculture , 1981 .

[31]  C. Romero,et al.  A Non-interactive Methodology to Assess Farmers' Utility Functions: An Application to Large Farms in Andalusia, Spain , 1998 .

[32]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[33]  W. Griffiths,et al.  Production Risk And Efficient Allocation Of Resources , 1982 .

[34]  J. Berbel,et al.  An MCDM approach to production analysis: An application to irrigated farms in Southern Spain , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  J. Pratt.  RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[36]  S. Turnovsky,et al.  The behaviour of a competitive firm with uncertainty in factor markets , 1969 .

[37]  Wilmer M. Harper,et al.  An Evaluation of Goal Hierarchies for Small Farm Operators , 1980 .

[38]  Mario Herrero,et al.  Characterising objective profiles of Costa Rican dairy farmers , 2001 .

[39]  David J. Pannell,et al.  UTILITY‐EFFICIENT PROGRAMMING FOR WHOLE‐FARM PLANNING , 1988 .

[40]  T. Farmer.  TESTING THE ROBUSTNESS OF MULTIATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY IN AN APPLIED SETTING , 1987 .

[41]  ARE FUNGICIDES, NITROGEN AND PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS RISK-REDUCING? EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SWISS WHEAT PRODUCTION , 1997 .