Improving Sonar Performance in Shallow Water Using Adaptive Beamforming

Multipath propagation degrades the performance of active, bottom-imaging sonars in shallow-water environments. One way to avoid multipath interference is to use a vertical array with a narrow enough angular response to separate the direct bottom return from the multipath. However, this requires a large array and is often infeasible for practical reasons. In this study, we focus on the use of adaptive beamforming on the receiver side to reduce multipath interference and hence improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Using a small, dense receiver array, we apply classical and adaptive beamformers to real data collected by the NATO Undersea Research Centre in a shallow-water environment. Our results show that the adaptive minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamformer offers an improvement in the estimated SNR compared to a conventional beamformer in most cases. However, the MVDR beamformer is suboptimal when the receiver consists of only a few elements. We propose using the low complexity adaptive (LCA) beamformer, which is based on the same optimization criteria as the MVDR beamformer, but is robust in a coherent environment without the need for spatial smoothing. For two to 4-element receivers, we observe an improvement of about 0.5-2.5 dB in the estimated SNR when using the LCA beamformer. In cases where the model indicates that the direct bottom return and the dominating multipath arrive from nearly the same angle, little or no improvement is observed. This is typically the case for first- or second-order multipaths reflected off the seafloor toward the receiver. The results from this study also show that with a small vertical array, a narrow mainlobe width is more important than low sidelobe levels, in terms of maximizing the SNR. Consequently, an unweighted conventional beamformer performs better than a conventional beamformer with a Hanning window applied for sidelobe suppression.

[1]  Torstein O. Sæbø,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF SHALLOW WATER PERFORMANCE USING INTERFEROMETRIC SONAR COHERENCE , 2009 .

[2]  G. Carter Coherence and time delay estimation , 1987, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  I.P. Kirsteins,et al.  Blind separation of interference for synthetic aperture sonar and the lessons learned from real data , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[4]  A. Austeng,et al.  Benefits of minimum-variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[5]  J. Capon High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis , 1969 .

[6]  Henry M. Gruen Environmentally adaptive sonar system , 2002 .

[7]  I.P. Kirsteins,et al.  Suppressing reverberation by multipath separation for improved buried object detection , 2001, MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001. An Ocean Odyssey. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.01CH37295).

[8]  T.O. Saebo,et al.  Relative Height Estimation by Cross-Correlating Ground-Range Synthetic Aperture Sonar Images , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[9]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques , 1993 .

[10]  Andreas Austeng,et al.  Adaptive Beamforming Applied to a Cylindrical Sonar Array Using an Interpolated Array Transformation , 2012, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[11]  Charles W. Therrien,et al.  Discrete Random Signals and Statistical Signal Processing , 1992 .

[12]  B. Carlson Covariance matrix estimation errors and diagonal loading in adaptive arrays , 1988 .

[13]  M. Melamed Detection , 2021, SETI: Astronomy as a Contact Sport.

[14]  B. D. Steinberg,et al.  Self-cohering large antenna arrays using the spatial correlation properties of radar clutter , 1989 .

[15]  J. Ogilvy,et al.  Theory of Wave Scattering From Random Rough Surfaces , 1991 .

[16]  B. Hunt,et al.  Modeling Surface Multipath Effects in Synthetic Aperture Sonar , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[17]  A. Bellettini,et al.  A New Synthetic Aperture Sonar Design with Multipath Mitigation , 2005 .

[18]  P. Stoica,et al.  Robust Adaptive Beamforming , 2013 .

[20]  Paris W. Vachon,et al.  Coherence estimation for SAR imagery , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[21]  J-F Synnevåg,et al.  A low-complexity data-dependent beamformer , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[22]  A. Bellettini,et al.  Design and Experimental Results of a 300-kHz Synthetic Aperture Sonar Optimized for Shallow-Water Operations , 2009, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[23]  D. Ellis,et al.  Bistatic reverberation calculations using a three-dimensional scattering function , 1991 .

[24]  D. Malacara-Hernández,et al.  PRINCIPLES OF OPTICS , 2011 .

[25]  Wenyao Xu,et al.  Wideband multipath rejection for shallow water synthetic aperture sonar imaging , 2009 .

[26]  W. Kuperman,et al.  Fundamentals of Ocean Acoustics , 2011 .

[27]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[28]  L. Brekhovskikh,et al.  Sound Propagation in the Random Ocean , 1982 .

[29]  R. Hanssen Radar Interferometry: Data Interpretation and Error Analysis , 2001 .

[30]  Bernard Widrow,et al.  Signal cancellation phenomena in adaptive antennas: Causes and cures , 1982 .

[31]  Feng Sun,et al.  Results of a three-row synthetic aperture sonar for multipath rejection , 2010, OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE.

[32]  A. Bellettini EFFECT OF MULTIPATH ON SYNTHETIC APERTURE SONAR , 2003 .