Technical note: Quantification of neurocranial shape variation using the shortest paths connecting pairs of anatomical landmarks.

Three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques have been widely used in quantitative comparisons of craniofacial morphology in humans and nonhuman primates. However, few anatomical landmarks can actually be defined on the neurocranium. In this study, an alternative method is proposed for defining semi-landmarks on neurocranial surfaces for use in detailed analysis of cranial shape. Specifically, midsagittal, nuchal, and temporal lines were approximated using Bezier curves and equally spaced points along each of the curves were defined as semi-landmarks. The shortest paths connecting pairs of anatomical landmarks as well as semi-landmarks were then calculated in order to represent the surface morphology between landmarks using equally spaced points along the paths. To evaluate the efficacy of this method, the previously outlined technique was used in morphological analysis of sexual dimorphism in modern Japanese crania. The study sample comprised 22 specimens that were used to generate 110 anatomical semi-landmarks, which were used in geometric morphometric analysis. Although variations due to sexual dimorphism in human crania are very small, differences could be identified using the proposed landmark placement, which demonstrated the efficacy of the proposed method.

[1]  C. Stringer,et al.  Geometric morphometric study of the regional variation of modern human craniofacial form. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[2]  M. Steyn,et al.  Investigation into the usability of geometric morphometric analysis in assessment of sexual dimorphism. , 2006, American journal of physical anthropology.

[3]  Hiromasa Suzuki,et al.  Approximate shortest path on a polyhedral surface and its applications , 2001, Comput. Aided Des..

[4]  Rolando González-José,et al.  The peopling of America: craniofacial shape variation on a continental scale and its interpretation from an interdisciplinary view. , 2008, American journal of physical anthropology.

[5]  K. Harvati,et al.  Alternative approaches to Space Curve Analysis Using the Example of the Neanderthal Occipital Bun , 2005 .

[6]  Gerhard W Weber,et al.  Principles for the virtual reconstruction of hominin crania. , 2009, Journal of human evolution.

[7]  F. Bookstein.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: localizing group differences in outline shape , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[8]  V. Bernal,et al.  Differences between sliding semi‐landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation , 2006, Journal of anatomy.

[9]  P. Gunz,et al.  Advances in Geometric Morphometrics , 2009, Evolutionary Biology.

[10]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Semilandmarks in Three Dimensions , 2005 .

[11]  Phillip L Walker,et al.  Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits. , 2008, American journal of physical anthropology.

[12]  Valeria Bernal,et al.  Analysis of sexual dimorphism of craniofacial traits using geometric morphometric techniques , 2011 .

[13]  David M J S Bowman,et al.  Flammable biomes dominated by eucalypts originated at the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary. , 2011, Nature communications.

[14]  Una Strand Vioarsdóttir,et al.  Inter- and intra-specific variation in the ontogeny of the hominoid facial skeleton: testing assumptions of ontogenetic variability. , 2004, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[15]  Heather M Garvin,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in skeletal browridge and chin morphologies determined using a new quantitative method. , 2012, American journal of physical anthropology.

[16]  Three-dimensional Geometric Morphometric Study of Craniofacial Variations in Jomon Populations , 2009 .

[17]  D. Ubelaker,et al.  Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains , 1994 .

[18]  Pete E. Lestrel,et al.  Sexual dimorphism using elliptical Fourier analysis: shape differences in the craniofacial complex , 2011 .

[19]  Erin H Kimmerle,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism in America: Geometric Morphometric Analysis of the Craniofacial Region * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[20]  Giorgio Manzi,et al.  Evolution of the base of the brain in highly encephalized human species. , 2011, Nature communications.

[21]  N. Ogihara,et al.  Three‐dimensional ontogenetic shape changes in the human cranium during the fetal period , 2008, Journal of anatomy.

[22]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[23]  N. Ogihara,et al.  Geometric morphometric study of temporal variations in human crania excavated from the Himrin Basin and neighboring areas, northern Iraq , 2009 .

[24]  S. F. dos Reis,et al.  Patterns of cranial shape diversification during the phylogenetic branching process of New World monkeys (Primates: Platyrrhini) , 2011, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[25]  Daniel Franklin,et al.  A geometric morphometric study of sexual dimorphism in the crania of indigenous southern Africans , 2006 .

[26]  Antonio Rosas,et al.  Thin-plate spline analysis of allometry and sexual dimorphism in the human craniofacial complex. , 2002, American journal of physical anthropology.

[27]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’ , 2004 .

[28]  P. Gunz,et al.  The pattern of endocranial ontogenetic shape changes in humans , 2009, Journal of anatomy.

[29]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[30]  P. O’Higgins.  The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry , 2000, Journal of anatomy.

[31]  E. Cabanis,et al.  Three‐dimensional procrustes analysis of modern human craniofacial form , 2007, Anatomical record.

[32]  J. Velemínská,et al.  Three-dimensional geometric morphometric analysis of cranio-facial sexual dimorphism in a Central European sample of known sex. , 2010, Homo : internationale Zeitschrift fur die vergleichende Forschung am Menschen.

[33]  C. Zollikofer,et al.  Visualizing patterns of craniofacial shape variation in Homo sapiens , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.