A Prototype Integrated Decision Support System for Breast Cancer Oncology

This paper describes an integrated clinical support system combining data entry and access with prognostic modelling, for use by the clinician, complemented by a patient information system tailored to the particular characteristics of the individual patient. The core of the system comprises a modelling methodology based on the PLANN-ARD neural network which combines risk staging with automatic rule generation to derive an explanation facility for the risk group allocation of each patient. The aim of the system is to promote better informed decision making on the part of both the clinician and the patient, exploiting the combined potential of analytical methodologies and the internet.

[1]  K Henne,et al.  Breast cancer: patient information needs reflected in English and German web sites , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  R. Snyder,et al.  Information from the Internet: attitudes of Australian oncology patients , 2006, Internal medicine journal.

[3]  S. Wyatt,et al.  'Ignorance is bliss sometimes': constraints on the emergence of the 'informed patient' in the changing landscapes of health information. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[4]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  Orthogonal search-based rule extraction (OSRE) for trained neural networks: a practical and efficient approach , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks.

[5]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  A Bayesian neural network approach for modelling censored data with an application to prognosis after surgery for breast cancer , 2003, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[6]  L Hoffman-Goetz,et al.  Quality of Breast Cancer Sites on the World Wide Web , 2000, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[7]  D G Altman,et al.  The scandal of poor medical research , 1994, BMJ.

[8]  E. Kaminski,et al.  Measuring information strategies in oncology - developing an information satisfaction questionnaire. , 2004, European journal of cancer care.

[9]  J. Scholefield,et al.  Finding the best from the rest: evaluation of the quality of patient information on the Internet. , 2003, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[10]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  A review of evidence of health benefit from artificial neural networks in medical intervention , 2002, Neural Networks.

[11]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  The Use of Artificial Neural Networks in Decision Support in Cancer: a Systematic Review , 2005 .

[12]  J Wyatt Same information, different decisions: format counts , 1999, BMJ.

[13]  Riitta Suhonen,et al.  Patients' informational needs and information received do not correspond in hospital. , 2005, Journal of clinical nursing.

[14]  Susan Eggly,et al.  Information seeking during "bad news" oncology interactions: Question asking by patients and their companions. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[15]  Lesley Fallowfield,et al.  Information provision for patients by breast cancer teams about the side-effects of hormone treatments. , 2006, European journal of cancer.

[16]  Claire Balmer,et al.  The Information Requirements of People With Cancer: Where to Go After the “Patient Information Leaflet”? , 2005, Cancer nursing.

[17]  Christof Schäfer,et al.  Ethical Aspects of Patient Information in Radiation Oncology , 2003, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.