A Serum Protein Biomarker Panel Improves Outcome Prediction in Human Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract Brain-enriched protein biomarkers of tissue fate are being introduced clinically to aid in traumatic brain injury (TBI) management. The aim of this study was to determine how concentrations of six different protein biomarkers, measured in samples collected during the first weeks after TBI, relate to injury severity and outcome. We included neurocritical care TBI patients that were prospectively enrolled from 2007 to 2013, all having one to three blood samples drawn during the first 2 weeks. The biomarkers analyzed were S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1), tau, and neurofilament-light (NF-L). Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was assessed at 12 months. In total, 172 patients were included. All serum markers were associated with injury severity as classified on computed tomography scans at admission. Almost all biomarkers outperformed other known outcome predictors with higher levels the first 5 days, correlating with unfavorable outcomes, and UCH-L1 (0.260, pseduo-R2) displaying the best discrimination in univariate analyses. After adjusting for acknowledged TBI outcome predictors, GFAP and NF-L added most independent information to predict favorable/unfavorable GOS, improving the model from 0.38 to 0.51 pseudo-R2. A correlation matrix indicated substantial covariance, with the strongest correlation between UCH-L1, GFAP, and tau (r = 0.827–0.880). Additionally, the principal component analysis exhibited clustering of UCH-L1 and tau, as well as GFAP, S100B, and NSE, which was separate from NF-L. In summary, a panel of several different protein biomarkers, all associated with injury severity, with different cellular origin and temporal trajectories, improve outcome prediction models.

[1]  D. Issadore,et al.  Extracellular vesicles as distinct biomarker reservoirs for mild traumatic brain injury diagnosis , 2021, Brain communications.

[2]  E. Diamandis,et al.  Novel severe traumatic brain injury blood outcome biomarkers identified with proximity extension assay , 2021, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[3]  Michael G. Anderson,et al.  Axonopathy precedes cell death in ocular damage mediated by blast exposure , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[4]  A. Lagares,et al.  Serum Amyloid A1/Toll-Like Receptor-4 Axis, an Important Link between Inflammation and Outcome of TBI Patients , 2021, Biomedicines.

[5]  Tomas Vedin,et al.  Microwave scan and brain biomarkers to rule out intracranial hemorrhage: study protocol of a planned prospective study (MBI01) , 2021, European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.

[6]  K. Blennow,et al.  Analysis of Brain Injury Biomarker Neurofilament Light and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes and Retinopathy of Prematurity Among Preterm Infants , 2021, JAMA network open.

[7]  Wai Hang Cheng,et al.  Development of a novel, sensitive translational immunoassay to detect plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) after murine traumatic brain injury , 2021, Alzheimer's research & therapy.

[8]  B. Balança,et al.  DAMPs and RAGE Pathophysiology at the Acute Phase of Brain Injury: An Overview , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[9]  K. Tyler,et al.  Evaluation of cell-based and tissue-based immunofluorescent assays for detection of glial fibrillary acidic protein autoantibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid of dogs with meningoencephalitis of unknown origin and other central nervous system disorders. , 2021, American journal of veterinary research.

[10]  E. Thelin,et al.  Delayed Neurosurgical Intervention in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Referred From Primary Hospitals Is Not Associated With an Unfavorable Outcome , 2021, Frontiers in Neurology.

[11]  Kevin K. W. Wang,et al.  Thorough overview of ubiquitin C‐terminal hydrolase‐L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein as tandem biomarkers recently cleared by US Food and Drug Administration for the evaluation of intracranial injuries among patients with traumatic brain injury , 2021, Acute medicine & surgery.

[12]  D. Sharp,et al.  Assessing the Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury—Time for a Change? , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[13]  R. Raj,et al.  How do we identify the crashing traumatic brain injury patient - the neurosurgeon's view. , 2020, Current opinion in critical care.

[14]  M. Crúz,et al.  Links between thrombosis and inflammation in traumatic brain injury. , 2020, Thrombosis research.

[15]  Chaowei Lian,et al.  Analysis of Clinical Related Factors of Neonatal Hand-Foot-Mouth Disease Complicated With Encephalitis , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[16]  Ian C. Kenny,et al.  A blood biomarker and clinical correlation cohort study protocol to diagnose sports-related concussion and monitor recovery in elite rugby , 2020, BMJ open sport & exercise medicine.

[17]  D. Sharp,et al.  Multicentre longitudinal study of fluid and neuroimaging BIOmarkers of AXonal injury after traumatic brain injury: the BIO-AX-TBI study protocol , 2020, BMJ Open.

[18]  K. Blennow,et al.  Admission Levels of Interleukin 10 and Amyloid β 1–40 Improve the Outcome Prediction Performance of the Helsinki Computed Tomography Score in Traumatic Brain Injury , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[19]  P. Nilsson,et al.  Fluid proteomics of CSF and serum reveal important neuroinflammatory proteins in blood–brain barrier disruption and outcome prediction following severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective, observational study , 2020, Critical Care.

[20]  K. Blennow,et al.  Dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid levels of matrix metalloproteinases in human traumatic brain injury , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[21]  Robert D Stevens,et al.  Novel approaches to prediction in severe brain injury , 2020, Current opinion in neurology.

[22]  M. Teixeira,et al.  Biomarkers for traumatic brain injury: a short review , 2020, Neurosurgical Review.

[23]  A. Michael-Titus,et al.  Lipid profiling of brain tissue and blood after traumatic brain injury: A review of human and experimental studies. , 2020, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[24]  Matthew C. Miller,et al.  Recent Advances in Blood-Based Biomarkers of Remote Combat-Related Traumatic Brain Injury , 2020, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports.

[25]  K. Blennow,et al.  Comparing Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) in Serum and Plasma Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Older Adults , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[26]  A. Rabinstein,et al.  Potentially Severe (Moderate) Traumatic Brain Injury: A New Categorization Proposal. , 2020, Critical care medicine.

[27]  K. Blennow,et al.  Interleukin 10 and Heart Fatty Acid-Binding Protein as Early Outcome Predictors in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[28]  Ł. Krzych,et al.  Biomarkers Facilitate the Assessment of Prognosis in Critically Ill Patients with Primary Brain Injury: A Cohort Study , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[29]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Blood biomarkers on admission in acute traumatic brain injury: Relations to severity, CT findings and care path in the CENTER-TBI study , 2020, EBioMedicine.

[30]  Zachary R. Fritz,et al.  Transcriptional Factors and Protein Biomarkers as Target Therapeutics in Traumatic Spinal Cord and Brain Injury , 2020, Current neuropharmacology.

[31]  K. Blennow,et al.  Admission Levels of Total Tau and β-Amyloid Isoforms 1–40 and 1–42 in Predicting the Outcome of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury , 2020, Frontiers in Neurology.

[32]  G. Raffa,et al.  Circulating miRNAs expression as potential biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury , 2020, Molecular Biology Reports.

[33]  S. DeKosky,et al.  Acute Effects of Sport-Related Concussion on Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase L1, Total Tau, and Neurofilament Light Measured by a Multiplex Assay , 2020 .

[34]  Sung-Chun Tang,et al.  Plasma neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein predict stroke in CADASIL , 2020, Journal of Neuroinflammation.

[35]  R. Cappai,et al.  Genetic modulators of traumatic brain injury in animal models and the impact of sex-dependent effects. , 2020, Journal of neurotrauma.

[36]  K. Lambertsen,et al.  Neurofilaments: The C-Reactive Protein of Neurology , 2020, Brain sciences.

[37]  R. Phillips,et al.  Protein Deimination and Extracellular Vesicle Profiles in Antarctic Seabirds , 2020, Biology.

[38]  D. Walt,et al.  Single-molecule measurements in microwells for clinical applications , 2019, Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences.

[39]  R. Irizarry ggplot2 , 2019, Introduction to Data Science.

[40]  Adam R Ferguson,et al.  Performance Evaluation of a Multiplex Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Four Clinically Relevant Traumatic Brain Injury Biomarkers. , 2019, Journal of neurotrauma.

[41]  J. Ornato,et al.  Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for prediction of absence of intracranial injuries on head CT (ALERT-TBI): a multicentre observational study , 2018, The Lancet Neurology.

[42]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Neurofilaments as biomarkers in neurological disorders , 2018, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[43]  K. Blennow,et al.  Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: current status and prospects for the future , 2018, Journal of internal medicine.

[44]  G. Manley,et al.  An update on diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for traumatic brain injury , 2018, Expert review of molecular diagnostics.

[45]  E. Thelin,et al.  Evaluation of novel computerized tomography scoring systems in human traumatic brain injury: An observational, multicenter study , 2017, PLoS medicine.

[46]  Christine M Baugh,et al.  Clinicopathological Evaluation of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in Players of American Football , 2017, JAMA.

[47]  D. Menon,et al.  Serial Sampling of Serum Protein Biomarkers for Monitoring Human Traumatic Brain Injury Dynamics: A Systematic Review , 2017, Front. Neurol..

[48]  L. Papa,et al.  Modeling the Kinetics of Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Ubiquitin Carboxyl-Terminal Hydrolase-L1, and S100B Concentrations in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2017, Journal of neurotrauma.

[49]  K. Blennow,et al.  Serum neurofilament light as a biomarker for mild traumatic brain injury in contact sports , 2017, Neurology.

[50]  M. van Gils,et al.  Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Are Not Specific Biomarkers for Mild CT-Negative Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2017, Journal of neurotrauma.

[51]  Ravi Prakash Jha,et al.  A prospective pilot study on serum cleaved tau protein as a neurological marker in severe traumatic brain injury , 2017, British journal of neurosurgery.

[52]  K. Blennow,et al.  Serum Neurofilament Light Protein as a Marker for Diffuse Axonal Injury: Results from a Case Series Study. , 2017, Journal of neurotrauma.

[53]  D. Janigro,et al.  Improving the clinical management of traumatic brain injury through the pharmacokinetic modeling of peripheral blood biomarkers , 2016, Fluids and Barriers of the CNS.

[54]  Henrik Zetterberg,et al.  Comparison of three analytical platforms for quantification of the neurofilament light chain in blood samples: ELISA, electrochemiluminescence immunoassay and Simoa , 2016, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[55]  A. Frostell,et al.  Utility of neuron-specific enolase in traumatic brain injury; relations to S100B levels, outcome, and extracranial injury severity , 2016, Critical Care.

[56]  M. van Gils,et al.  The Levels of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 During the First Week After a Traumatic Brain Injury: Correlations With Clinical and Imaging Findings. , 2016, Neurosurgery.

[57]  K. Blennow,et al.  Serum neurofilament light protein predicts clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[58]  E. Thelin,et al.  Kinetic modelling of serum S100b after traumatic brain injury , 2016, BMC Neurology.

[59]  G. Brophy,et al.  Time Course and Diagnostic Accuracy of Glial and Neuronal Blood Biomarkers GFAP and UCH-L1 in a Large Cohort of Trauma Patients With and Without Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2016, JAMA neurology.

[60]  M. van Gils,et al.  Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 as Outcome Predictors in Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2016, World neurosurgery.

[61]  A. Rodríguez-Rodríguez,et al.  S100B and Neuron-Specific Enolase as mortality predictors in patients with severe traumatic brain injury , 2016, Neurological research.

[62]  Jin Lei,et al.  Glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker in severe traumatic brain injury patients: a prospective cohort study , 2015, Critical Care.

[63]  Chang-Hyun Lee,et al.  A Role of Serum-Based Neuronal and Glial Markers as Potential Predictors for Distinguishing Severity and Related Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injury , 2015, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[64]  E. Thelin,et al.  Comparative Assessment of the Prognostic Value of Biomarkers in Traumatic Brain Injury Reveals an Independent Role for Serum Levels of Neurofilament Light , 2015, PloS one.

[65]  T. Hökfelt,et al.  Defining the Human Brain Proteome Using Transcriptomics and Antibody-Based Profiling with a Focus on the Cerebral Cortex , 2015, PloS one.

[66]  M. Hutchison,et al.  Blood Biomarkers in Moderate-To-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Potential Utility of a Multi-Marker Approach in Characterizing Outcome , 2015, Front. Neurol..

[67]  M. Wise,et al.  Neuron-Speci fi c Enolase as a Predictor of Death or Poor Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest and Targeted Temperature Management at 33 C and 36 C , 2015 .

[68]  L. Koskinen,et al.  Association of ICP, CPP, CT findings and S-100B and NSE in severe traumatic head injury. Prognostic value of the biomarkers , 2015, Brain injury.

[69]  Maiken Nedergaard,et al.  Biomarkers of Traumatic Injury Are Transported from Brain to Blood via the Glymphatic System , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[70]  K. Blennow,et al.  Blood biomarkers for brain injury in concussed professional ice hockey players. , 2014, JAMA neurology.

[71]  E. Thelin,et al.  Secondary Peaks of S100B in Serum Relate to Subsequent Radiological Pathology in Traumatic Brain Injury , 2014, Neurocritical Care.

[72]  E. Yan,et al.  Post-traumatic hypoxia is associated with prolonged cerebral cytokine production, higher serum biomarker levels, and poor outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. , 2014, Journal of neurotrauma.

[73]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Acute biomarkers of traumatic brain injury: relationship between plasma levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 and glial fibrillary acidic protein. , 2014, Journal of neurotrauma.

[74]  F. Tomasello,et al.  Combining Biochemical and Imaging Markers to Improve Diagnosis and Characterization of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in the Acute Setting: Results from a Pilot Study , 2013, PloS one.

[75]  E. Thelin,et al.  S100B is an important outcome predictor in traumatic brain injury. , 2013, Journal of neurotrauma.

[76]  K. Blennow,et al.  Biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury in cerebrospinal fluid and blood , 2013, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[77]  Henrik Zetterberg,et al.  Tau proteins in serum predict neurological outcome after hypoxic brain injury from cardiac arrest: results of a pilot study. , 2013, Resuscitation.

[78]  Bertil Romner,et al.  Scandinavian guidelines for initial management of minimal, mild and moderate head injuries in adults: an evidence and consensus-based update , 2013, BMC Medicine.

[79]  J. Osredkar,et al.  Multiple indicators model of long-term mortality in traumatic brain injury , 2012, Brain injury.

[80]  A. Gabrielli,et al.  Brain injury biomarkers may improve the predictive power of the IMPACT outcome calculator. , 2012, Journal of neurotrauma.

[81]  F. Tortella,et al.  Serum levels of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase distinguish mild traumatic brain injury from trauma controls and are elevated in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury patients with intracranial lesions and neurosurgical intervention , 2012, The journal of trauma and acute care surgery.

[82]  R. Bullock,et al.  Glial neuronal ratio: a novel index for differentiating injury type in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. , 2012, Journal of neurotrauma.

[83]  A. Gabrielli,et al.  Clinical Utility of Serum Levels of Ubiquitin C-terminal Hydrolase as a Biomarker for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury , 2022 .

[84]  F. Tortella,et al.  Neuronal and glial markers are differently associated with computed tomography findings and outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a case control study , 2011, Critical care.

[85]  A. Gabrielli,et al.  Biokinetic analysis of ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) in severe traumatic brain injury patient biofluids. , 2011, Journal of neurotrauma.

[86]  L. Hansson,et al.  Secondary insults following traumatic brain injury enhance complement activation in the human brain and release of the tissue damage marker S100B , 2010, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[87]  Pedro M. Valero-Mora,et al.  ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis , 2010 .

[88]  M. Buchfelder,et al.  The Passage of S100B from Brain to Blood Is Not Specifically Related to the Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity , 2010, Cardiovascular psychiatry and neurology.

[89]  H. Weng,et al.  Tau proteins in serum predict outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. , 2010, The Journal of surgical research.

[90]  R. MacCallum,et al.  Extended analysis of early computed tomography scans of traumatic brain injured patients and relations to outcome. , 2010, Journal of neurotrauma.

[91]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Comparison of techniques for handling missing covariate data within prognostic modelling studies: a simulation study , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[92]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[93]  L. Morrison,et al.  Resuscitation with hypertonic saline-dextran reduces serum biomarker levels and correlates with outcome in severe traumatic brain injury patients. , 2009, Journal of neurotrauma.

[94]  J. Simard,et al.  Glial fibrillary acidic protein is highly correlated with brain injury. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[95]  Juan Lu,et al.  Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission Characteristics , 2008, PLoS medicine.

[96]  Ewout Steyerberg,et al.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[97]  C. Werner,et al.  Pathophysiology of traumatic brain injury. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[98]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Multivariable prognostic analysis in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[99]  Juan Lu,et al.  Statistical approaches to the univariate prognostic analysis of the IMPACT database on traumatic brain injury. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[100]  D. Sakas,et al.  Serum S-100B protein monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.

[101]  Susan S. Margulies,et al.  Inflicted Childhood Neurotrauma: New Insight into The Detection, Pathobiology, Prevention, and Treatment of Our Youngest Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury , 2007 .

[102]  K. Blennow,et al.  Initial CSF total tau correlates with 1-year outcome in patients with traumatic brain injury , 2006, Neurology.

[103]  K. Waterloo,et al.  Analysis of protein S-100B in serum: a methodological study , 2006, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[104]  K. Blennow,et al.  Increased serum-GFAP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury is related to outcome , 2006, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[105]  D. Sakas,et al.  Slight and short-lasting increase of serum S-100B protein in extra-cranial trauma , 2006, Brain injury.

[106]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Prediction of Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury with Computed Tomographic Characteristics: A Comparison between the Computed Tomographic Classification and Combinations of Computed Tomographic Predictors , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[107]  A. Raabe,et al.  GFAP versus S100B in serum after traumatic brain injury: relationship to brain damage and outcome. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[108]  A. Raabe,et al.  Glial fibrillary acidic protein in serum after traumatic brain injury and multiple trauma. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[109]  Erik Johansson,et al.  Using chemometrics for navigating in the large data sets of genomics, proteomics, and metabonomics (gpm) , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[110]  V. Seifert,et al.  S-100B protein as a serum marker of secondary neurological complications in neurocritical care patients , 2004, Neurological research.

[111]  T. Leino,et al.  Effects of head and extracranial injuries on serum protein S100B levels in trauma patients. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[112]  T. Beems,et al.  Glial and neuronal proteins in serum predict outcome after severe traumatic brain injury , 2004, Neurology.

[113]  A. Kanner,et al.  Serum S100β , 2003, Cancer.

[114]  C. Alling,et al.  Elimination of S100B and renal function after cardiac surgery. , 2000, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[115]  C. Alling,et al.  Neuron-specific enolase increases in plasma during and immediately after extracorporeal circulation. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[116]  S P Baker,et al.  A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[117]  D. Harris,et al.  Neurone-specific enolase and Sangtec 100 assays during cardiac surgery: part III - does haemolysis affect their accuracy? , 1997, Perfusion.

[118]  Anthony Marmarou,et al.  A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography , 1991 .

[119]  E. Thelin,et al.  Serum Protein Biomarkers in the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury , 2020 .

[120]  K. Blennow,et al.  Biomarkers for Alzheimer disease – current status and prospects for the future , 2018 .

[121]  Ramon Diaz-Arrastia,et al.  Increases of Plasma Levels of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Tau, and Amyloid β up to 90 Days after Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2017, Journal of neurotrauma.

[122]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[123]  A. Hyder,et al.  The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. , 2007, NeuroRehabilitation.

[124]  J. Ghajar,et al.  In Reply: Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: 2020 Update of the Decompressive Craniectomy Recommendations. , 2020, Neurosurgery.

[125]  V. Seifert,et al.  Serum markers of brain damage and outcome prediction in patients after severe head injury. , 1999, British journal of neurosurgery.

[126]  H Greig,et al.  Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score: a scoring chart. , 1985, The Journal of trauma.

[127]  B Jennett,et al.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. , 1975, Lancet.