Employee perception towards electronic monitoring at work place and its impact on job satisfaction of software professionals in Sri Lanka

Electronic monitoring is a rapidly growing phenomenon in Sri Lankan software industry. It allows employers to observe what employees do on the job and review employee communications, including e-mail and internet activity that employees consider private. Often, employers use electronic monitoring to ensure organizational confidentiality, limiting employer liability for employee misconduct. From the perspective of employees, electronic monitoring by employers involves several privacy and confidentiality concerns. Most of the time, employee performance and productivity aspects captured via electronic monitoring are effectively used by the Human Resources Departments, for decision making associated with the employees. Majority of the software development organizations in Sri Lanka today use some means of electronic technology to monitor their employee activities. Most of the time, employee perception towards electronic monitoring at work, contradicts with the need for law enforcement within the organization intended by the top management. Employers justify electronic monitoring at work place in terms of protecting the company's confidential information, preventing the misuse of the organizational resources while uplifting the quality of work and productivity. On the other hand, the mutual trust that should be there between the employer and the employee is in question. Therefore, this study empirically investigated the relationship that might exist between the software professionals' perception towards electronic monitoring at work place and its impact on their job satisfaction. Based on disproportionate stratified random sampling, data were collected from 380 software professionals in Sri Lanka, by administrating a structured questionnaire in which items were of 5 point Lickert scale. The data analysis included the univariate, bivariate and multivariate analyses. In this study, Perceived Relevance to Work and Personal Judgment of Effectiveness which were two variables used to measure perception of electronic monitoring were positively correlated with Job Satisfaction. This means that the software professionals, who view electronic monitoring as something which is relevant to their work as well as which uplifts the quality of their work, are satisfied in their jobs. Perceived Invasion of Privacy was negatively correlated to Job Satisfaction, which sheds some light in organizational electronic monitoring policy making. Also, Perceived Task Satisfaction was negatively correlated to Job Satisfaction. This means that the software professionals, who thought that working in an electronically monitored environment makes their tasks more complex, are rather dissatisfied in the job. Also, it appeared that the impact of electronic monitoring at work place on the job satisfaction of software professionals becomes less significant along with higher professional experience. The findings of this research can be incorporated in IT security policy making in the software development organizations in Sri Lanka and in similar economics, with a special emphasis on the job satisfaction of their employees, which is the most valuable asset of the organization.

[1]  Neville Meyers,et al.  Employee Privacy in the Electronic Workplace: Current Issues for IT Professionals , 2003 .

[2]  Jeffrey M. Stanton,et al.  Reactions to Employee Performance Monitoring: Framework, Review, and Research Directions , 2000 .

[3]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[4]  Dana Schwieger,et al.  Internet Usage Monitoring in the Workplace: Its Legal Challenges and Implementation Strategies , 2007, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[5]  R. Guion.  A note on organizational climate , 1973 .

[6]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Electronic performance monitoring and social context: impact on productivity and stress. , 1995, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  J. R. Aiello,et al.  Computer Monitoring of Work Performance: Extending the Social Facilitation Framework to Electronic Presence1 , 1993 .

[8]  G. Stoney Alder,et al.  Towards understanding fairness judgments associated with computer performance monitoring: An integration of the feedback, justice, and monitoring research , 2005 .

[9]  Bradley J. Alge,et al.  Effects of computer surveillance on perceptions of privacy and procedural justice. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[10]  Charlie C. Chen,et al.  An empirical evaluation of key factors contributing to internet abuse in the workplace , 2008, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[11]  J. Hackman,et al.  Relationships between organization structure and employee reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks , 1981 .

[12]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice , 1988 .

[13]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  PEOPLE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE: A PROFILE COMPARISON APPROACH TO ASSESSING PERSON-ORGANIZATION FIT , 1991 .

[14]  G. Spreitzer.  Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment , 1996 .

[15]  G. H. Litwin,et al.  Motivation and Organizational Climate , 1968 .

[16]  Julie A. Flanagan,et al.  Restricting Electronic Monitoring in the Private Workplace , 1994 .

[17]  Brian H. Kleiner,et al.  Electronic surveillance in the workplace , 2003 .

[18]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  Job control and worker health , 1989 .

[19]  D. Caldwell,et al.  Task perceptions and job satisfaction: A question of causality. , 1982 .

[20]  Terri L. Griffith.  Monitoring and Performance: A Comparison of Computer and Supervisor Monitoring , 1993 .

[21]  John R. Aiello,et al.  Computer‐Based Work Monitoring: Electronic Surveillance and Its Effects , 1993 .

[22]  D. Nebeker,et al.  The Effects of Computer Monitoring, Standards, and Rewards on Work Performance, Job Satisfaction, and Stress1 , 1993 .

[23]  R. V. Krejcie,et al.  Determining Sample Size for Research Activities , 1970 .

[24]  A. Pettigrew.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[25]  Mihaela Vorvoreanu,et al.  Examining Electronic Surveillance In The Workplace: A Review Of Theoretical Perspectives And Research Findings , 2000 .

[26]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  Legitimating Clinical Research in the Study of Organizational Culture. , 1993 .

[27]  Louis B. Barnes,et al.  Organizational climate : explorations of a concept , 1970 .

[28]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[29]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  The Fact of Fiction in Organizational Ethnography. , 1979 .

[30]  G. Ekvall.  Organizational climate for creativity and innovation , 1996 .

[31]  Effy Oz,et al.  Electronic workplace monitoring: What employees think , 1999 .

[32]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction , 2005 .

[33]  Scott C. D'Urso,et al.  Who’s Watching Us at Work? Toward a Structural–Perceptual Model of Electronic Monitoring and Surveillance in Organizations , 2006 .

[34]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[35]  D. Denison.  What is the Difference Between Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate? A Native's Point of View on a Decade of Paradigm Wars , 1996 .