Factors affecting openness of local government websites: Examining the differences across planning, finance and police departments

Abstract The use of information and communication technologies (ICTs) in public organizations increasingly holds the potential to improve transparency, accountability, and public participation, by providing a more effective and efficient disclosure of information to the citizens and organizations and by providing channels for interaction with the government. While transparency and interactivity features of government websites constitute two critical elements for public participation and democracy facilitated by web-based technologies, little research has been done to explain why some public organizations choose to deploy website technology more openly with these features. This paper aims to examine the managerial, organizational, and environmental factors that are related to variation in transparency and interactivity features of local government websites, which we believe are key dimensions to governmental website openness. The paper first develops a literature informed conceptual model of governmental website openness and then tests this model using data from a national survey of 850 government managers in 500 cities. The model results are compared across three different departments: community development, finance, and police department. Overall findings indicate that higher website openness is positively related to increased frequency of public participation in agency decision making and civil society influence, increased technical capacity, lower organizational control, and higher perceived usefulness of website technology. In addition, due to differences in the operating contexts of the departments, the effects of organizational control, technical capacity, environmental influences, and perceived usefulness of website technology on governmental website openness tend to differ by the type of department.

[1]  C. Weare,et al.  Designing Web Technologies for Local Governance Reform: Good Management or Good Democracy? , 2000 .

[2]  Mark Perry,et al.  Improving the process of E-Government initiative: An in-depth case study of web-based GIS implementation , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[4]  Jean-Patrick Villeneuve,et al.  Organizational barriers to transparency , 2007 .

[5]  Bruce Bimber.  The Internet and Citizen Communication With Government: Does the Medium Matter? , 1999 .

[6]  Daniel Lathrop,et al.  Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice , 2010 .

[7]  Mary Maureen Brown,et al.  The Benefits and Costs of Information Technology Innovations: An Empirical Assessment of a Local Government Agency , 2001 .

[8]  Rob Kling,et al.  IT and organizational change in digital economies: a socio-technical approach , 1999, CSOC.

[9]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[10]  H. Rainey,et al.  Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations , 1999 .

[11]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Characterizing eParticipation , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[12]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Computing and public organizations , 1997 .

[13]  Jonathan P. West,et al.  The Impact of Revitalized Management Practices on the Adoption of Information Technology: A National Survey of Local Governments , 2001 .

[14]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Public Management Strategies: Guidelines for Managerial Effectiveness , 1990 .

[15]  William D. Berry,et al.  Innovation and Diffusion Models in Policy Research , 2019, Theories of the Policy Process.

[16]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  All Organizations Are Public: Bridging Public and Private Organization Theories. , 1988 .

[17]  Hans Jochen Scholl,et al.  Discipline or Interdisciplinary Study Domain? Challenges and Promises in Electronic Government Research , 2008, Digital Government.

[18]  C. Weare,et al.  Institutional Motivations in the Adoption of Innovations: The Case of E-Government , 2011 .

[19]  D. West.  E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[20]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  The relationship between transparent and participative government: A study of local governments in the United States , 2012 .

[21]  Hamid Tavakolian,et al.  Linking the Information Technology Structure with Organizational Competitive Strategy: A Survey , 1989, MIS Q..

[22]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  Studying Governance and Public Management: Challenges and Prospects , 2000 .

[23]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Top Decisions: Strategic Decision-Making in Organizations. , 1987 .

[24]  J. Cockcroft.  The process of technological innovation , 1965 .

[25]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[26]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 2004 .

[27]  A. Meijer.  Understanding modern transparency , 2009 .

[28]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[29]  Glenn Hoetker,et al.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional ChangeBuilding the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change, by FountainJane E.. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001. , 2002 .

[30]  Eunjung Shin,et al.  Attitudinal Determinants of E-Government Technology Use among U.S. Local Public Managers , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[31]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  Hans J Schnoll.  Modeling the Relationship between Web-site Effectiveness and Service Quality: A Study of State Level Human Services Agencies , 2015 .

[33]  H. Rainey.  Understanding and Managing Public Organizations , 1991 .

[34]  Cory L. Armstrong.  Providing a clearer view: An examination of transparency on local government websites , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[35]  M. Hillebrandt,et al.  Open government: connecting vision and voice , 2012 .

[36]  P. Jaeger,et al.  E-Government and Technology Acceptance: The Case of the Implementation of Section 508 Guidelines for Websites , 2009 .

[37]  Andrea Faber,et al.  Politics As Usual The Cyberspace Revolution , 2016 .

[38]  Melvin J. Dubnick,et al.  Accountability in the Public Sector: Lessons from the Challenger Tragedy , 1987 .

[39]  J. C. Thomas,et al.  The New Face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government , 2003 .

[40]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[41]  Caroline J. Tolbert,et al.  The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government , 2003, DG.O.

[42]  David B. Greenberger,et al.  Modeling the Relationship Between Pay Level and Pay Satisfaction , 1997 .

[43]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Decision Making in Public and Private Organizations: A Test of Alternative Concepts of "Publicness" , 1990 .

[44]  M. Asgarkhani.  The Reality of Social Inclusion Through Digital Government , 2007 .

[45]  Albert Meijer,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on government transparency , 2012 .

[46]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Crossing the Threshold: Practical Foundations for Government Services on the World Wide Web , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[47]  George A. Boyne,et al.  Sources of public service improvement: a critical review and research agenda , 2003 .

[48]  Chris C. Demchak,et al.  Webbing governance: global trends across national-level public agencies , 2001, CACM.

[49]  Eric S. Fredin.  The Web of Politics: The Internet's Impact on the American Political System , 1999 .

[50]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Open e-government in U.S. state governments: Survey evidence from Chief Information Officers , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[51]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Management Information Systems in Public and Private Organizations: An Empirical Test. , 1990 .

[52]  Kristin R. Eschenfelder,et al.  How do government agencies review and approve text content for publication on their Web sites? A framework to compare Web content management practices , 2004 .

[53]  Erin L. Borry,et al.  Transparency and Local Government Websites , 2009 .

[54]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[55]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  Public management information systems: theory and prescription , 1986 .

[56]  Donald P. Moynihan,et al.  Goal‐Based Learning and the Future of Performance Management , 2005 .

[57]  J. Grimes,et al.  Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e‐government , 2012 .

[58]  Enrique Bonsón,et al.  Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..