The effect of spatial pattern on nutrient removal of a wetland landscape

The effect of spatial pattern on nutrient removal is investigated using a spatial simulation model. Field data have been used from reed marshes in the Liaohe Delta, China. Four scenarios have been designed to test the effect of different landscape components on nutrient removal in the reed marsh: canal density, reed area size, reed area shrinking pattern, and pumping station position. Using the same spatial model especially designed for the study area, the efficiency of nutrient removal in each of these scenarios is simulated. The results indicate that spatial variations within each factor cause less than 10% change in the removal of total nutrients. More canals make little difference. Smaller areas are more efficient than larger ones. Some shrinkage patterns are better than others. Close proximity of the pumping station to the border of the area to be irrigated is more efficient than more distant locations. These conclusions provide theoretical support to strategic decisions for local land use planning, and contribute to the understanding of the relationship between landscape patterns and functions.

[1]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[2]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Quantitative methods in landscape ecology : the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity , 1991 .

[3]  B. Arheimer,et al.  Modelling the effects of wetlands on regional nitrogen transport , 1994 .

[4]  Ü. Mander,et al.  Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Estonia , 1997 .

[5]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  DISSOLVED ORGANIC CARBON AS AN INDICATOR OF THE SCALE OF WATERSHED INFLUENCE ON LAKES AND RIVERS , 1999 .

[6]  Uno Wennergren,et al.  Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes , 1995, Nature.

[7]  J. Dørge.  Modelling nitrogen transformations in freshwater wetlands. Estimating nitrogen retention and removal in natural wetlands in relation to their hydrology and nutrient loadings , 1994 .

[8]  K. McGarigal,et al.  FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. , 1995 .

[9]  W. Mitsch,et al.  Modelling nutrient retention of a freshwater coastal wetland : estimating the roles of primary productivity, sedimentation, resuspension and hydrology , 1991 .

[10]  Sharon K. Collinge,et al.  A conceptual model of land conversion processes: predictions and evidence from a microlandscape experiment with grassland insects , 1998 .

[11]  F. van Langevelde,et al.  Habitat connectivity and fragmented nuthatch populations in agricultural landscapes , 1999 .

[12]  S. Qian,et al.  Long-Term Phosphorus Assimilative Capacity in Freshwater Wetlands: A New Paradigm for Sustaining Ecosystem Structure and Function , 1999 .

[13]  Bruce T. Milne,et al.  Indices of landscape pattern , 1988, Landscape Ecology.

[14]  A regional analysis of total nitrogen in an agricultural landscape , 1989, Landscape Ecology.

[15]  W. Mitsch.  Global wetlands: old world and new , 1994 .

[16]  Nathan H. Schumaker,et al.  Using Landscape Indices to Predict Habitat Connectivity , 1996 .

[17]  R. Gardner,et al.  Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology , 1991 .

[18]  S. Jørgensen,et al.  Modelling nutrient retention by a reedswamp and wet meadow in Denmark , 1988 .

[19]  S. Newman,et al.  Phosphorus storage and release in response to flooding: implications for Everglades stormwater treatment areas , 2001 .

[20]  G. Pinay,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Denitrification in a Riparian Forest , 1993 .

[21]  E. S. Pearson.  Biometrika tables for statisticians , 1967 .