Statistical Decision Assistance for Determining Energy-Efficient Options In Building Design Under Uncertainty

Designers need to compare numerous design options in the process of designing an energy-efficient building. There are two impediments in this process, first probabilistic prediction of energy requirement at an early stage of design with uncertain design parameters and, second, selecting a design option based on the probabilistic energy prediction. The paper presents an integration of machine learning energy prediction model with building information modelling (BIM) tool to make probabilistic energy prediction, i.e. ranges of values. Wilcoxon rank-sum test is useful in this situation, which is capable of comparing alternatives based on probabilistic energy predictions. The tool has been developed to extract information from the BIM model, make probabilistic energy prediction using the Monte Carlo method, and perform statistical analysis. It has been found that BIM integrated machine learning model can make energy prediction of six design alternatives in 30-35 seconds with no additional modelling efforts. Higher uncertainty in the design parameters will result in larger uncertainty in the energy prediction, and the test may not be able to suggest the better option even using statistical comparison. This will require the more precise value of design parameters, i.e. reduced uncertainty. Different uncertainty levels in the design parameters have been tested to which extent they are sufficient to make a selection of the energyefficient option. It is observed that uncertainty levels that are suitable for decision-making depend on the combination of design options to be compared. It is possible to differentiate among alternatives with high uncertainty in the design parameters if they are entirely different else more precise definition of the design parameters is required. This research provides a method to select a better option among the developed options based on energy performance at the early stage of design.

[1]  Philipp Geyer,et al.  Linking BIM and Design of Experiments to balance architectural and technical design factors for energy performance , 2018 .

[2]  Philipp Geyer,et al.  Component-Based Machine Learning for Energy Performance Prediction by MultiLOD Models in the Early Phases of Building Design , 2018, EG-ICE.

[3]  Gregory W. Corder,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach , 2009 .

[4]  Kristoffer Negendahl,et al.  Building performance simulation in the early design stage: An introduction to integrated dynamic models , 2015 .

[5]  Ming Hu,et al.  Does zero energy building cost more? – An empirical comparison of the construction costs for zero energy education building in United States , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[6]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[7]  Philipp Geyer,et al.  Component-based machine learning for performance prediction in building design , 2018, Applied Energy.

[8]  Mario Sassone,et al.  The early design stage of a building envelope: Multi-objective search through heating, cooling and lighting energy performance analysis , 2015 .

[9]  Clarice Bleil de Souza,et al.  Thermal simulation software outputs: a framework to produce meaningful information for design decision-making , 2015 .

[10]  Jason Brown,et al.  Assessment of uncertainty and confidence in building design exploration , 2015, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[11]  Staf Roels,et al.  Probabilistic design and analysis of building performances: methodology and application example , 2014 .

[12]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  A review of uncertainty analysis in building energy assessment , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[13]  Philipp Geyer,et al.  Deep-learning neural-network architectures and methods: Using component-based models in building-design energy prediction , 2018, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[14]  P.J.C.J. De Wilde,et al.  Computational Support for the Selection of Energy Saving Building Components , 2004 .

[15]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty in building performance assessment , 2013 .

[16]  Young Jin Kim,et al.  BIM interface for full vs. semi-automated building energy simulation , 2014 .

[17]  Clarice Bleil De Souza,et al.  Of collaboration or condemnation?Exploring the promise and pitfalls of architect-consultant collaborations for building performance simulation. , 2016 .

[18]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  Design analysis integration: supporting the selection of energy saving building components , 2002 .

[19]  Jae-Weon Jeong,et al.  Optimization of a free-form building shape to minimize external thermal load using genetic algorithm , 2014 .