Comparison of biofouling mechanisms between cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes in osmotic membrane bioreactors.

There are two types of popular forward osmosis (FO) membrane materials applied for researches on FO process, cellulose triacetate (CTA) and thin film composite (TFC) polyamide. However, performance and fouling mechanisms of commercial TFC FO membrane in osmotic membrane bioreactors (OMBRs) are still unknown. In current study, its biofouling behaviors in OMBRs were investigated and further compared to the CTA FO membrane. The results indicated that β-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides and microorganisms accounted for approximately 77% of total biovolume on the CTA FO membrane while β-D-glucopyranose polysaccharides (biovolume ratio of 81.1%) were the only dominant biofoulants on the TFC FO membrane. The analyses on the biofouling structure implied that a tighter biofouling layer with a larger biovolume was formed on the CTA FO membrane. The differences in biofouling behaviors including biofoulants composition and biofouling structure between CTA and TFC FO membranes were attributed to different membrane surface properties.

[1]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[2]  Shuren Chou,et al.  Membrane biofouling and scaling in forward osmosis membrane bioreactor , 2012 .

[3]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes , 2008 .

[4]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Study of integration of forward osmosis and biological process: Membrane performance under elevated salt environment , 2011 .

[5]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2012, Water research.

[6]  J. Tay,et al.  Distribution of extracellular polymeric substances in aerobic granules , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[7]  Kiyotaka Sakai,et al.  Optimum dialysis membrane for endotoxin blocking , 2003 .

[8]  D.J.H. Harmsen,et al.  Membrane fouling and process performance of forward osmosis membranes on activated sludge , 2008 .

[9]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes , 2010 .

[11]  Rong Wang,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of flat-sheet thin film composite forward osmosis membranes , 2011 .

[12]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Organic fouling of thin-film composite polyamide and cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membranes by oppositely charged macromolecules. , 2013, Water research.

[13]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Fluorecent staining for study of extracellular polymeric substances in membrane biofouling layers. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Q. Shen,et al.  Multiple fluorescence labeling and two dimensional FTIR-13C NMR heterospectral correlation spectroscopy to characterize extracellular polymeric substances in biofilms produced during composting. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Chung‐Hak Lee,et al.  Comparison of the filtration characteristics between attached and suspended growth microorganisms in submerged membrane bioreactor. , 2001, Water research.

[16]  Ying Dong,et al.  Chemical cleaning protocols for thin film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes used for municipal wastewater treatment , 2015 .

[17]  Yueping Ren,et al.  Integration of micro-filtration into osmotic membrane bioreactors to prevent salinity build-up. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[18]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2013 .

[19]  Guanghui Yu,et al.  In situ observation of the growth of biofouling layer in osmotic membrane bioreactors by multiple fluorescence labeling and confocal laser scanning microscopy. , 2015, Water research.

[20]  Lucas J Stal,et al.  Analysis of a marine phototrophic biofilm by confocal laser scanning microscopy using the new image quantification software PHLIP , 2006, BMC Ecology.

[21]  L. Y. Dudley,et al.  Biofouling in membrane systems — A review☆ , 1998 .

[22]  L. Rietveld,et al.  Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: a review. , 2014, Water research.

[23]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Biofouling in forward osmosis and reverse osmosis: Measurements and mechanisms , 2015 .

[24]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Forward osmosis organic fouling: Effects of organic loading, calcium and membrane orientation , 2013 .

[25]  F. Smith,et al.  COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETER-MINATION OF SUGAR AND RELATED SUBSTANCE , 1956 .

[26]  Zhaozhe Hua,et al.  Influences of sludge retention time on the performance of submerged membrane bioreactors with the addition of iron ion , 2012 .

[27]  Kyung-Min Yeon,et al.  Characterization of biofilm structure and its effect on membrane permeability in MBR for dye wastewater treatment. , 2006, Water research.

[28]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes , 2009 .

[29]  Xiaolan Xiao,et al.  Impacts of sludge retention time on the performance of submerged membrane bioreactor with the addition of calcium ion , 2011 .

[30]  Rong Wang,et al.  Modeling salt accumulation in osmotic membrane bioreactors: Implications for FO membrane selection a , 2011 .

[31]  Yueping Ren,et al.  Impacts of sludge retention time on sludge characteristics and membrane fouling in a submerged osmotic membrane bioreactor. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[32]  Wenshan Guo,et al.  High retention membrane bioreactors: challenges and opportunities. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[33]  Anthony G Fane,et al.  Characterization of biofouling in a lab-scale forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FOMBR). , 2014, Water research.

[34]  Benny D. Freeman,et al.  Water Purification by Membranes: The Role of Polymer Science , 2010 .