Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders' Views of Nature of Science.

This study investigated the influence of an explicit and reflective inquiry-oriented compared with an implicit inquiry-oriented instructional approach on sixth graders' understandings of nature of science (NOS). The study emphasized the tentative, empirical, inferential, and imaginative and creative NOS. Participants were 62 sixth-grade students in two intact groups. The intervention or explicit group was engaged in inquiry activities followed by reflective discussions of the target NOS aspects. The comparison or implicit group was engaged in the same inquiry activities. However, these latter activities included no explicit references to or discussion of any NOS aspects. Engagement time was balanced for both groups. An open-ended questionnaire in conjunction with semistructured interviews was used to assess partici- pants' NOS views before and at the conclusion of the intervention, which spanned 2.5 months. Before the intervention, the majority of participants in both groups held naive views of the target NOS aspects. The views of the implicit group participants were not different at the conclusion of the study. By comparison, substantially more participants in the explicit group articulated more informed views of one or more of the target NOS aspects. Thus, an explicit and reflective inquiry-oriented approach was more effective than an implicit inquiry-oriented approach in promoting participants' NOS conceptions. These results do not support the intuitively appealing assumption that students would automatically learn about NOS through engagement in science-based inquiry activities. Developing informed conceptions of NOS is a cognitive instructional outcome that requires an explicit and reflective instructional approach. ! 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 39: 551-578, 2002

[1]  M. Rowe.  A Humanistic Intent: The Program of Preservice Elementary Education at the University of Florida. , 1974 .

[2]  Paul D. Eggen,et al.  Strategies for Teachers: Teaching Content and Thinking Skills , 2000 .

[3]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  A National Experiment in Curriculum Evaluation , 1972 .

[4]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[5]  Yvonne J. Meichtry.  Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development , 1992 .

[6]  Folajimi Akindehin.  Effect of an instructional package on preservice science teachers' understanding of the nature of science and acquisition of science‐related attitudes , 1988 .

[7]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  A Study of Two Misconceptions About the Nature Of Science Among Junior High School Students , 1981 .

[8]  Glenn H. Crumb.  Understanding of science in high school physics , 1965 .

[9]  E. Jungwirth.  An evaluation of the attained development of the intellectual skills needed for “Understanding of the nature of scientific enquiry” by B.S.C.S. pupils in Israel , 1970 .

[10]  Edgar W. Jenkins,et al.  Benchmarks for Science Literacy: a review symposium∗ , 1995 .

[11]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[12]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .

[13]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Avoiding De-Natured Science: Activities that Promote Understandings of the Nature of Science , 1998 .

[14]  J. Trent.  The attainment of the concept “understanding science” using contrasting physics courses , 1965 .

[15]  Lindsay D. Mackay,et al.  Development of understanding about the nature of science , 1971 .

[16]  Victor Y. Billeh,et al.  Factors Affecting Teachers' Gain in Understanding the Nature of Science. , 1975 .

[17]  H. Birnie.  Identifying Affective Goals in Science Education. , 1978 .

[18]  B. Shapiro.  A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the “face of science that does not yet know” , 1996 .

[19]  A. Lawson.  The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction , 1982 .

[20]  P. Tamir.  Understanding the process of science by students exposed to different science curricula in israel , 1972 .

[21]  Lowell J. Bethel,et al.  The effect of a science methods course on the philosophical view of science among elementary education majors , 1977 .

[22]  J. Primack,et al.  Project 2061: Science for All Americans. , 1989, The Physiologist.

[23]  Marie Larochelle,et al.  "Of course, it's just obvious" : Adolescents' ideas of scientific knowledge , 1991 .

[24]  M. B. Ogunniyi.  Relative Effects of a History/Philosophy of Science Course on Student Teachers' Performance on Two Models of Science. , 1983 .

[25]  Peter A. Rubba,et al.  The Myth of Absolute Truth. , 1978 .

[26]  Lawrence C. Scharmann.  The influences of sequenced instructional strategy and locus of control on preservice elementary teachers' understanding of the nature of science , 1988 .

[27]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Embedding Nature of Science Instruction in Preservice Elementary Science Courses: Abandoning Scientism, But... , 2001 .

[28]  Gerald Holton.  The Project Physics Course, Then and Now , 2003 .

[29]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science , 2000 .

[30]  Lawrence C. Scharmann.  Locus of control: A discriminator of the ability to foster an understanding of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers , 1988 .

[31]  Richard J. Bady.  Students' understanding of the logic of hypothesis testing , 1979 .

[32]  Milton O. Pella,et al.  The development of an instrument for inventorying knowledge of the processes of science , 1967 .

[33]  R. Wood.  University Education Student's Understanding of the Nature and Processes of Science , 1970 .

[34]  The Effects of an Intensive Summer Laboratory Internship on Secondary Students' Understanding of the Nature of Science as Measured by the Test on Understanding of Science (TOUS). , 1993 .

[35]  Margaret Diane LeCompte.  Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, 2nd Edition , 1993 .

[36]  J. Solomon,et al.  Teaching about the Nature of Science through History: Action Research in the Classroom. , 1992 .

[37]  A. Collins.  National Science Education Standards: A Political Document. , 1998 .

[38]  F. Abd‐El‐Khalick.  The influence of history of science courses on students' conceptions of the nature of science , 1998 .

[39]  Leopold E. Klopfer,et al.  The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists: A report on the HOSG instruction project , 1963 .

[40]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  Assessing Understanding of the Nature of Science: A Historical Perspective , 1998 .

[41]  Nyles G. Stauss,et al.  An Analysis of Experienced Science Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science , 1970 .

[42]  Nyles G. Stauss,et al.  An analysis of the understanding of the nature of science by prospective secondary science teachers , 1968 .

[43]  Joan Solomon.  Exploring the Nature of Science: Key Stage 3 , 1991 .

[44]  R. Olstad.  The effect of science teaching methods on the understanding of science , 1969 .

[45]  R. Hackett.  Young People's Images of Science , 1996 .

[46]  M. Gertrude Hennessey,et al.  Sixth-Grade Students' Epistemologies of Science: The Impact of School Science Experiences on Epistemological Development , 2000 .

[47]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural , 1998 .

[48]  Charles R. Barman,et al.  High School Students' Views about the Nature of Science: Results from Three Countries , 1995 .

[49]  P. Durkee.  An analysis of the appropriateness and utilization of TOUS with special reference to high‐ability students studying physics , 1974 .

[50]  Susan Carey,et al.  `An experiment is when you try it and see if it works': a study of grade 7 students' understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge , 1989 .

[51]  J. Kelly.  Science for All Americans (A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology) American Association for the Advancement of Science , 1990 .

[52]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Students' Perceptions of Tentativeness in Science: Development, Use, and Sources of Change. , 1990 .

[53]  Rutherford's enlarged: a content-embedded activity to teach about nature of science , 2002 .