Three-reactors chemical looping process for hydrogen production

Abstract This paper analyzes a novel process for producing hydrogen from natural gas, based on chemical looping (CL) techniques, allowing for intrinsic capture of carbon dioxide. The core of the process consists of a three-reactors CL system, where iron oxide particles are circulated to: (i) oxidize natural gas (thus providing, after cooling and water condensation, a CO 2 stream ready for sequestration), (ii) reduce steam, to produce hydrogen as the final product of the process, (iii) consume oxygen from an air stream, to sustain the thermal balance of the system. The process is intrinsically very attractive, because it directly produces hydrogen and CO 2 from natural gas, by means of a process simpler than the conventional technologies with CO 2 capture capabilities. Hence, a significant potential for investment cost reduction can be anticipated. However, to fully exploit the system potential, an efficient energy recovery from the gaseous streams exiting the reactors must be arranged, taking into account power and steam production needed to support internal consumptions. Therefore, after an introduction clarifying the concept and the scope of the system, as well as its basic chemistry, this paper presents a discussion of two plant configurations, including different integration levels with power production (fired gas turbine (GT) vs. unfired turbocharger) and/or heat recovery steam production methods (also considering steam compression devices). A comparison with “proven technology” plants, based on steam reforming, is also carried out. Due to the lack of reliable estimates of the investment costs for components to be developed from scratch (CL reactors), the analysis is limited to the thermodynamic and technological aspects. Results show, however, that an impressive potential exists for CL systems for hydrogen production, thus deserving substantial R&D activities in the near future.

[1]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  A comparative analysis of IGCCs with CO2 sequestration , 1999 .

[2]  B. Metz IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage , 2005 .

[3]  Shunji Kumagai,et al.  System Outline and Operational Status of Karita Power Station New Unit 1 (PFBC) , 2004 .

[4]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  A Thermodynamic Analysis of Different Options to Break 60% Electric Efficiency in Combined Cycle Power Plants , 2004 .

[5]  A. Bejan Advanced Engineering Thermodynamics , 1988 .

[6]  Giovanni Lozza,et al.  Using Hydrogen as Gas Turbine Fuel , 2003 .

[7]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  Decarbonized hydrogen and electricity from natural gas , 2005 .

[8]  Jens Wolf,et al.  Comparison of nickel- and iron-based oxygen carriers in chemical looping combustion for CO2 capture in power generation , 2005 .

[9]  A. Lyngfelt,et al.  Comparison of iron-, nickel-, copper- and manganese-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion , 2004 .

[10]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[11]  Tobias Mattisson,et al.  Integrated hydrogen and power production with CO2 capture using chemical-looping reforming-redox reactivity of particles of CuO, Mn 2O3, NiO, and Fe2O3 using SiO 2 as a support , 2005 .

[12]  Jens Wolf,et al.  Parametric study of chemical looping combustion for tri‐generation of hydrogen, heat, and electrical power with CO2 capture , 2005 .

[13]  Stefano Consonni,et al.  Chemical Looping Combustion for Combined Cycles with CO2 Capture , 2006 .

[14]  A. Abad,et al.  Mapping of the range of operational conditions for Cu-, Fe-, and Ni-based oxygen carriers in chemical-looping combustion , 2007 .

[15]  John A. Turner,et al.  Sustainable Hydrogen Production , 2004, Science.