Racial prejudice in the canadian legal system

The effects of defendant and victim race and the impact of judicial instructions on defendant verdict were examined using a simulated videotaped rape trial. Subjects were 243 Canadian university students randomly assigned to one of eight conditions. Subjects were asked to assume the role of juror and to view a videotape of a simulated rape trial. The results indicated that the defendant's overall attractiveness or “positive appeal” was the best predictor of defendant guilt, above and beyond defendant race. Neither victim characteristics nor the presence of judicial instructions was found to have predictive utility. Results are contrasted with findings from simulation studies in the United States.

[1]  M. Wolfgang,et al.  Rape, race, and the death penalty in Georgia. , 1975, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[2]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Prejudice, Discrimination, and Racism , 1986 .

[3]  J. Krulewitz,et al.  Attributions About Rape: Effects of Rapist Force, Observer Sex and Sex Role Attitudes , 1978 .

[4]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1967 .

[5]  C. Nemeth,et al.  A simulated jury study: Characteristics of the defendant and the jurors. , 1973 .

[6]  George L. Jurow.  New Data on the Effect of a "Death Qualified" Jury on the Guilt Determination Process , 1971 .

[7]  Vincent Yzerbyt,et al.  The “Black Sheep Effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification , 1988 .

[8]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[9]  J. Dovidio,et al.  The aversive form of racism. , 1986 .

[10]  H. Kaiser.  A second generation little jiffy , 1970 .

[11]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[12]  H. S. Feild,et al.  Character of the Defendant and Length of Sentence in Rape and Burglary Crimes , 1978 .

[13]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  The construction and validation of a juror bias scale , 1983 .

[14]  D. C. Ugwuegbu.  Racial and evidential factors in juror attribution of legal responsibility , 1979 .

[15]  R. Bagby,et al.  The Effect of Prejudice and Judicial Ambiguity on Defendant Guilt Ratings , 1993 .

[16]  L. Wrightsman,et al.  Effects of Presentation Mode Upon Mock Jurors' Reactions to a Trial , 1979 .

[17]  J. Pfeifer,et al.  Ambiguity and Guilt Determinations: A Modern Racism Perspective' , 1991 .

[18]  N. Kerr,et al.  Laboratory simulation and bias in the study of juror behavior , 1989 .

[19]  R. Howell,et al.  Juror Perceptions of Trial Testimony as a Function of the Method of Presentation: A Comparison of Live, Color Video, Black-and-White Video, Audio, and Transcript Presentations , 1975 .

[20]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .

[21]  N. Kerr,et al.  Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: jurors' bias for leniency. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  N. Vidmar,et al.  Judging the Jury. , 1987 .

[23]  H. S. Feild.  Rape trials and jurors' decisions , 1979 .

[24]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Law and Society Review , 1979 .

[25]  K. Klein,et al.  Race, Rape, and Bias: Distortion of Prior Odds and Meaning Changes , 1982 .

[26]  R. Michael Bagby,et al.  Prejudice in a simulated legal context: A further application of social identity theory , 1992 .

[27]  H. Bullock.  Significance of the Racial Factor in the Length of Prison Sentences , 1961 .

[28]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The Effect of Peremptory Challenges on Jury and Verdict: An Experiment in a Federal District Court , 1978 .

[29]  M. Radelet,et al.  RACE AND PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION IN HOMICIDE CASES , 1985 .