Evaluation of dental morphometrics during the orthodontic treatment

BackgroundDiagnostic orthodontic and prosthetic procedures commence with an initial examination, during which a number of individual findings on occlusion or malocclusion are clarified. Nowadays we try to replace standard plaster casts by scanned objects and digital models.MethodGeometrically calibrated images aid in the comparison of several different steps of the treatment and show the variation of selected features belonging to individual biomedical objects. The methods used are based on geometric morphometrics, making a new approach to the evaluation of the variability of features. The study presents two different methods of measurement and shows their accuracy and reliability.ResultsThe experimental part of the present paper is devoted to the analysis of the dental arch objects of 24 patients before and after the treatment using the distances between the canines and premolars as the features important for diagnostic purposes. Our work proved the advantage of measuring digitalized orthodontic models over manual measuring of plaster casts, with statistically significant results and accuracy sufficient for dental practice.ConclusionA new method of computer imaging and measurements of a dental stone cast provides information with the precision required for orthodontic treatment. The results obtained point to the reduction in the variance of the distances between the premolars and canines during the treatment, with a regression coefficient RC=0.7 and confidence intervals close enough for dental practice. The ratio of these distances pointed to the nearly constant value of this measure close to 0.84 for the given set of 24 individuals.

[1]  Paul W Major,et al.  Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements. , 2006, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  Marc Quirynen,et al.  Age as compromising factor for implant insertion. , 2003, Periodontology 2000.

[3]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  A Statistical Model , 1990 .

[4]  Angel R. Martinez,et al.  Computational Statistics Handbook with MATLAB, Second Edition (Chapman & Hall/Crc Computer Science & Data Analysis) , 2007 .

[5]  Thomas J Cangialosi,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  Wei Liang,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of maxillary first molar orthodontics , 2010, 2010 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics.

[7]  A. Johal,et al.  Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models: a systematic review. , 2011, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[8]  William R Proffit,et al.  Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized lingual orthodontic appliance. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[9]  Thomas J Cangialosi,et al.  Comparison of measurements made on digital and plaster models. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[10]  Li Zhongke,et al.  Computer aided orthodontics treatment by virtual segmentation and adjustment , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Image Analysis and Signal Processing.

[11]  E. D. Van Rest,et al.  Methods of Statistical Analysis , 1954 .

[12]  M. Hans,et al.  Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts. , 2008, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  U Hägg,et al.  Virtual model analysis as an alternative approach to plaster model analysis: reliability and validity. , 2010, European journal of orthodontics.

[14]  Jean-Luc Dugelay,et al.  3D Object Processing , 2008 .

[15]  K Hero Breuning,et al.  Dental models made with an intraoral scanner: a validation study. , 2012, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  Dan Grauer Three-dimensional applications in orthodontics , 2010 .

[17]  J. Wishart,et al.  Methods of Statistical Analysis , 1954 .

[18]  Sim Heng Ong,et al.  Tooth segmentation of dental study models using range images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Giuseppe Perinetti,et al.  Diagnostic performance of combined canine and second molar maturity for identification of growth phase , 2013, Progress in Orthodontics.

[20]  M. Macconaill,et al.  The ideal form of the human dental arcade, with some prosthetic application. , 1949, The Dental record.

[21]  R. Cibrián,et al.  A comparison between dental measurements taken from CBCT models and those taken from a digital method. , 2013, European journal of orthodontics.

[22]  Xiaobo Zhou,et al.  An Automatic and Robust Algorithm of Reestablishment of Digital Dental Occlusion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Robert E. Moyers,et al.  Craniofacial growth during adolescence , 1987 .

[24]  Charles Annis,et al.  Statistical Distributions in Engineering , 2001, Technometrics.

[25]  M. Zelditch,et al.  Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists , 2012 .

[26]  Jeremy Knox,et al.  A Comparison of Plaster, Digital and Reconstructed Study Model Accuracy , 2008, Journal of orthodontics.

[27]  Marco Caversaccio,et al.  A New System for Computer-Aided Preoperative Planning and Intraoperative Navigation During Corrective Jaw Surgery , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[28]  Khaled H. Attia,et al.  Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[29]  Thomas J Cangialosi,et al.  Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts. , 2009, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[30]  Chung How Kau,et al.  Evaluation of CBCT digital models and traditional models using the Little's Index. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[31]  P. Vig Orthodontics, current principles and techniques , 1985 .

[32]  A F Roche,et al.  Pubertal spurts in cranial base and mandible. Comparisons within individuals. , 1985, The Angle orthodontist.

[33]  T. Mikami,et al.  Measurements of dental cast profile and three-dimensional tooth movement during orthodontic treatment , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Márcia de Fátima Conti,et al.  Longitudinal evaluation of dental arches individualized by the WALA ridge method , 2011 .

[35]  Yuichi Taguchi,et al.  A Theory of Minimal 3D Point to 3D Plane Registration and Its Generalization , 2013, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[36]  Matthew A. Carlton,et al.  Data Analysis: Statistical and Computational Methods for Scientists and Engineers , 2020 .

[37]  T Dostálová,et al.  Study of edge detection task in dental panoramic radiographs. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[38]  Matthew J. Peluso,et al.  Digital models: An introduction , 2004 .

[39]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Evaluation of tip and torque on virtual study models: a validation study , 2013, Progress in orthodontics.

[40]  T Jemt,et al.  Single implants in the upper incisor region and their relationship to the adjacent teeth. An 8-year follow-up study. , 1999, Clinical oral implants research.

[41]  R. Adaskevicius,et al.  Evaluation of Dental Arch Form Using 3D Dental Cast Scanning Technology , 2009 .

[42]  Allen R Firestone,et al.  The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[43]  Scher Ea,et al.  The ideal form of the human dental arcade, with some prosthetic application. , 1949 .

[44]  Jaroslav Racek,et al.  Composite veneers, crowns, and inlay bridges after orthodontic therapy--a three-year prospective study. , 2003, General dentistry.

[45]  A. Jacobson,et al.  An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[46]  Chung How Kau,et al.  A Comparison of the Accuracy of Linear Measurements Obtained from Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Images and Digital Models. , 2011, Seminars in orthodontics.

[47]  Katherine W L Vig,et al.  Comparison of peer assessment rating (PAR) index scores of plaster and computer-based digital models. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[48]  John D. Muir,et al.  Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques , 1985 .

[49]  Tatjana Dostalova,et al.  Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster cast from 3D digital study models , 2013, Biomedical engineering online.

[50]  T Dostálová,et al.  Shape and size of dental arch--a five-year prospective study. , 2006, Methods of information in medicine.

[51]  William R Proffit,et al.  REGISTRATION OF ORTHODONTIC DIGITAL MODELS. , 2011, Craniofacial growth series.

[52]  Paul W Major,et al.  Linear measurements using virtual study models. , 2012, The Angle orthodontist.

[53]  P. Gunz,et al.  Geometric Morphometrics , 2019, Archaeological Science.

[54]  T. Cangialosi,et al.  Editor's Summary and Q&A , 2009 .

[55]  Chiarella Sforza,et al.  Digital dental cast placement in 3-dimensional, full-face reconstruction: a technical evaluation. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[56]  Tomasz Waller,et al.  Familial or Sporadic Idiopathic Scoliosis – classification based on artificial neural network and GAPDH and ACTB transcription profile , 2013, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[57]  G. Izard,et al.  New method for the determination of the normal arch by the function of the face , 1927 .

[58]  Angel R. Martinez,et al.  Computational Statistics Handbook with MATLAB , 2001 .

[59]  Márcia de Fátima Conti,et al.  Avaliação longitudinal de arcadas dentárias individualizadas com o método Borda WALA , 2011 .

[60]  Edgard Nyssen,et al.  On the augmented reproducibility in measurements on 3D orthodontic digital dental models and the definition of feature points. , 2013, Australian orthodontic journal.

[61]  A. C. Davison,et al.  Statistical models: Name Index , 2003 .

[62]  R. Adaskevicius,et al.  Three-dimensional Determination of Dental Occlusion and Facial Structures using Soft Tissue Cephalometric Analysis , 2012 .

[63]  Charles H. Tweed,et al.  The Frankfort-Mandibular Incisor Angle (FMIA) In Orthodontic Diagnosis, Treatment Planning and Prognosis* , 2009 .

[64]  Grant C Townsend,et al.  Validity and reliability of tooth size and dental arch measurements: a stereo photogrammetric study , 2012, Australian orthodontic journal.

[65]  W. Gardiner Statistics for the Biosciences , 1997 .

[66]  José G. Ramcrez Data Analysis: Statistical and Computational Methods for Scientists and Engineers , 2000, Technometrics.