Aseismic slip and fault‐normal strain along the central creeping section of the San Andreas fault

[1] We use GPS data to measure the aseismic slip along the central San Andreas fault (CSAF) and the deformation across adjacent faults. Comparison of EDM and GPS data sets implies that, except for small-scale transients, the fault motion has been steady over the last 40 years. We add 42 new GPS velocities along the CSAF to constrain the regional strain distribution. Shear strain rates are less than 0.083 ± 0.010 μstrain/yr adjacent to the creeping SAF, with 1–4.5 mm/yr of contraction across the Coast Ranges. Dislocation modeling of the data gives a deep, long-term slip rate of 31–35 mm/yr and a shallow (0–12 km) creep rate of 28 mm/yr along the central portion of the CSAF, consistent with surface creep measurements. The lower shallow slip rate may be due to the effect of partial locking along the CSAF or reflect reduced creep rates late in the earthquake cycle of the adjoining SAF rupture zones.

[1]  J. Langbein,et al.  Slip on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California, over Two Earthquake Cycles, and the Implications for Seismic Hazard , 2006 .

[2]  W. Prescott,et al.  Geodetic measurements near Parkfield, California, 1959–1984 , 1987 .

[3]  W. Prescott,et al.  Short-range distance measurements along the San Andreas fault system in central California, 1975 to 1979 , 1981 .

[4]  W. D. Stuart,et al.  Long‐term fault creep observations in central California , 1982 .

[5]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Geodetic determination of relative plate motion in central California , 1973 .

[6]  Alan T. Linde,et al.  A slow earthquake sequence on the San Andreas fault , 1996, Nature.

[7]  David D. Jackson,et al.  Crustal deformation across and beyond the Los Angeles basin from geodetic measurements , 1996 .

[8]  Ian Parsons,et al.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1986 .

[9]  D. Argus,et al.  Present tectonic motion across the Coast Ranges and San Andreas fault system in central California , 2001 .

[10]  M. Gladwin,et al.  Measurements of the strain field associated with episodic creep events on the San Andreas Fault at San Juan Bautista, California , 1994 .

[11]  M. A. D'Alessio,et al.  Slicing up the San Francisco Bay Area : Block kinematics and fault slip rates from GPS-derived surface velocities , 2005 .

[12]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  Creep and quakes on the northern transition zone of the San Andreas fault from GPS and InSAR data , 2005 .

[13]  W. Thatcher.  Systematic inversion of geodetic data in central California , 1979 .

[14]  P. Bodin,et al.  INCREASED SURFACE CREEP RATES ON THE SAN ANDREAS FAULT SOUTHEAST OF THE LOMA PRIETA MAIN SHOCK , 1997 .

[15]  R. Nadeau,et al.  Periodic Pulsing of Characteristic Microearthquakes on the San Andreas Fault , 2004, Science.

[16]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  When faults communicate: Viscoelastic coupling and earthquake clustering in a simple two‐fault system , 2003 .

[17]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Interaction of the San Andreas Fault Creeping Segment with Adjacent great rupture zones and earthquake recurrence at Parkfield , 1993 .

[18]  Eric J. Fielding,et al.  Coseismic and Postseismic Slip of the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake from Space-Geodetic Data , 2006 .

[19]  Paul Segall,et al.  Spatiotemporal evolution of a transient slip event on the San Andreas fault near Parkfield, California , 2005 .

[20]  S. Titus,et al.  Thirty-Five-Year Creep Rates for the Creeping Segment of the San Andreas Fault and the Effects of the 2004 Parkfield Earthquake: Constraints from Alignment Arrays, Continuous Global Positioning System, and Creepmeters , 2006 .

[21]  R. Simpson,et al.  The response of creeping parts of the San Andreas fault to earthquakes on nearby faults: Two examples , 1988 .

[22]  R. Bürgmann,et al.  Coseismic slip distribution of the 2003 Mw 6.6 San Simeon earthquake, California, determined from GPS measurements and seismic waveform data , 2006 .