Pulse Performance Modeling of a Twin Entry Turbocharger Turbine Under Full and Unequal Admission

The pulsating nature of gas flow within the exhaust manifold of an internal combustion engine is not well captured by the quasi-steady techniques typically employed by cycle simulation programs for turbocharger modeling. This problem is compounded by the unequal admission conditions imposed on the turbine by the use of multiple entry housings installed as standard on pulse turbocharged diesel engines. This unsteady behavior presents the simulation engineer with a unique set of difficulties when modeling turbocharger turbines. It is common for experienced analysts to accommodate multiple entries by splitting the flow across duplicate components and by tuning the level of interference between volute entries but this necessarily bespoke approach is limited to upstream modifications that cannot capture true turbine unsteady operation. This paper describes recent simulation code development work undertaken at Caterpillar to improve machine submodel accuracy essential for virtual product development meeting U.S. nonroad Tier 4 emission standards. The resulting turbine performance model has been validated against experimental data for a twin entry turbocharger suitable for heavy duty nonroad applications, obtained using a permanent magnet eddy-current dynamometer and pulse flow test facility. Comparison between experiment and prediction demonstrates good agreement under full admission in terms of both instantaneous flow capacity and turbine actual power although unequal admission results indicate the need for further model development.

[1]  F. J. Wallace,et al.  Performance of Inward Radial Flow Turbines under Unsteady Flow Conditions with Full and Partial Admission , 1970 .

[2]  De Winterbone,et al.  Theory of Engine Manifold Design: Wave Action Methods for IC Engineers , 2001 .

[3]  I Hakeem,et al.  Modelling of a Turbocharger Turbine Under Pulsating Inlet Conditions , 1996 .

[4]  Siegfried Sumser,et al.  The Asymmetric Twin Scroll Turbine for Exhaust Gas Turbochargers , 2008 .

[5]  Joon Hock Yeo,et al.  Pulsating flow behaviour in a twin-entry vaneless radial inflow turbine , 1990 .

[6]  Aaron Costall,et al.  A one-dimensional study of unsteady wave propagation in turbocharger turbines , 2007 .

[7]  S. F. Davis TVD finite difference schemes and artificial viscosity , 1984 .

[8]  Xiao Hu,et al.  A Model for Radial Flow Turbine Performance in Highly Unsteady Flows , 2001 .

[9]  D. Richtmyer,et al.  A Survey of Difference Methods for Non-Steady Fluid Dynamics , 1962 .

[10]  S. F. Davis,et al.  A simplified TVD finite difference sheme via artificial viscousity , 1987 .

[11]  Ricardo Martinez-Botas,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Turbocharger Turbine Performance Under Pulsating Flow Conditions , 2005 .

[12]  D. E. Winterbone,et al.  The thermodynamics and gas dynamics of internal-combustion engines. Volume II , 1982 .

[13]  F. J. Wallace,et al.  The Pulsating-Flow Performance of Inward Radial-Flow Turbines , 1965 .

[14]  Richard Pearson,et al.  A Multi-Pipe Junction Model for One-Dimensional Gas-Dynamic Simulations , 2003 .

[15]  Ricardo Martinez-Botas,et al.  Assessment of Unsteady Behavior in Turbocharger Turbines , 2006 .

[16]  Ricardo Martinez-Botas,et al.  Fundamental Characterization of Turbocharger Turbine Unsteady Flow Behavior , 2007 .

[17]  R. S. Benson,et al.  Non-Steady Flow through a Gauze in a Duct , 1965 .