Determination the Levels of Thief Zones Based on Machine Learning

The technique of interwell tracer testing is considered as one of the most effective method to identify the thief zone (TZ) in reservoirs. However, in heavy oil reservoirs, tracer breakthrough curves are mostly parabolic and unimodal, thus resulting in slight differences between curves. It is inefficient and inaccurate to identify different types of curves with traditional methods applied to characterize the levels of TZs. In this paper, convolutional neural network (CNN) is applied to construct a classification model for the automatic identification of the levers of TZs. According to the TZs criteria specified on the field, the analytical tracer transport model was applied to generate 3000 curves as the sample, which can meet the requirements of model training accuracy. In the meantime, One-hot encoding, Xavier initialization, Adam optimizer, and mini-batch normalization were used to construct the model, and the key parameters are optimized to improve the performance of the model. The results show that the appropriate activation function is ReLU and the optimal dropout rate is 0.5. Moreover, the construction of CNN with discrete data points (DDP-CNN) as input contributed to a further improvement of classification accuracy of tracer curves. The accuracy of DDP-CNN in training set is 0.96, which is 14% and 23% higher than random forest (RF) and k-means, respectively. In practical applications, DDP-CNN proves capable to correctly classify 88 of the 100 curves.

[1]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[2]  Lufeng Zhang,et al.  A Novel Early Warning System of Oil Production Based on Machine Learning , 2019 .

[3]  Lyudmila Sukhostat,et al.  Lithological facies classification using deep convolutional neural network , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[4]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[5]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[6]  D. M. Adams,et al.  Experiences with waterflooding Lloydminster heavy-oil reservoirs , 1982 .

[7]  K. A. Miller Improving the State of the Art of Western Canadian Heavy Oil Waterflood Technology , 2006 .

[8]  W. E. Brigham,et al.  Prediction Of Tracer Behavior In Five-Spot Flow , 1965 .

[9]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  Xinming Wu,et al.  Application of a convolutional neural network in permeability prediction: A case study in the Jacksonburg-Stringtown oil field, West Virginia, USA , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[11]  M. Choudhary,et al.  Advances of Interwell Tracer Analysis in the Petroleum Industry , 2005 .

[12]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[13]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Learning Activation Functions to Improve Deep Neural Networks , 2014, ICLR.

[14]  Y. Pei,et al.  Tracer Flowback Based Fracture Network Characterization in Hydraulic Fracturing , 2016 .

[15]  Water Control Diagnostic Plot Pattern Recognition Using Support Vector Machine (Russian) , 2018 .

[16]  T. Aurdal,et al.  Tracer Simulation to Improve the Reservoir Model in the Snorre Field , 2000 .

[17]  Shuhua Wang,et al.  Insights to fracture stimulation design in unconventional reservoirs based on machine learning modeling , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[18]  Hongyang Chu,et al.  An Automatic Classification Method of Well Testing Plot Based on Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) , 2019, Energies.

[19]  Zhangxin Chen,et al.  Modeling tracer flowback in tight oil reservoirs with complex fracture networks , 2017 .