Is there a rational basis for post-surgical lifting restrictions? 1. Current understanding

Abstract Lifting restrictions postoperatively are quite common, but there appears to be little scientific basis for them. Lifting restrictions are inhibitory in terms of return to work and may be a factor in chronicity. The mean functional spinal motion unit stiffness changes with in vitro or computer-simulated discectomies, facetectomies and laminectomies were reviewed from the literature. We modified the NIOSH lifting equation to include another multiplier related to stiffness change post surgery. The new recommended lifts were computed for different lifting conditions seen in industry. The reduction of rotational stiffness ranged from 21% to 41% for a discectomy, 1% to 59% for a facetectomy and 4% to 16% for a partial laminectomy. The recommended lifts based on our modified equation were adjusted accordingly. There is no rational basis for current lifting restrictions. The risk to the spine is a function of many other variables as well as weight (i.e., distance of weight from body). The adjusted NIOSH guidelines provide a reasonable way to estimate weight restrictions and accommodations such as lifting aids. Such restrictions should be as liberal as possible so as to facilitate, not prevent, return to work. Patients need more advice regarding lifting activities and clinicians should be more knowledgeable about the working conditions and constraints of a given workplace to effectively match the solution to the patient’s condition.

[1]  A Garg,et al.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. , 1993, Ergonomics.

[2]  M. Nordin,et al.  Normal Trunk Muscle Strength and Endurance in Women and the Effect of Exercises and Electrical Stimulation: Part 2: Comparative Analysis of Electrical Stimulation and Exercises to Increase Trunk Muscle Strength and Endurance , 1987, Spine.

[3]  L L Wiltse,et al.  Preoperative psychological tests as predictors of success of chemonucleolysis in the treatment of the low-back syndrome. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  A Mital,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of manual lifting tasks. , 1987, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[5]  D Coggon,et al.  Occupational causes of low-back pain. , 1989, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[6]  T. Mayer,et al.  Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation: I. A Standardized Protocol and Normative Database , 1988, Spine.

[7]  M. Nordin,et al.  Normal Trunk Muscle Strength and Endurance in Women and the Effect of Exercises and Electrical Stimulation: Part 1: Normal Endurance and Trunk Muscle Strength in 101 Women , 1987, Spine.

[8]  Xiaolin Zhu,et al.  Histochemistry and Morphology of Erector Spinae Muscle in Lumbar Disc Herniation , 1989, Spine.

[9]  D G Wilder,et al.  Risk factors in low-back pain. An epidemiological survey. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  T. Mayer Functional restoration for spinal disorders , 1988 .

[11]  Ingalill Lindström,et al.  Validity of Patient Reporting and Predictive Value of Industrial Physical Work Demands , 1994, Spine.

[12]  A. Thorstensson,et al.  Trunk muscle strength during constant velocity movements. , 1982, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  C. Price,et al.  Sexual Complications of Anterior Fusion of the Lumbar Spine , 1984, Spine.

[14]  H. Weber,et al.  Lumbar disc herniation. A controlled, prospective study with ten years of observation. , 1983, Spine.

[15]  D. Warwick,et al.  Trunk Strengths in Attempted Flexion, Extension, and Lateral Bending in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Low‐Back Disorders , 1980, Spine.

[16]  A. Nachemson,et al.  Mobility, Strength, and Fitness After a Graded Activity Program for Patients with Subacute Low Back Pain: A Randomized Prospective Clinical Study with a Behavioral Therapy Approach , 1992, Spine.

[17]  David G. Wilder,et al.  Is there a rational basis for post-surgical lifting restrictions? 2. Possible scientific approach , 1999, European Spine Journal.

[18]  T. Ito,et al.  Trunk-muscle strength during concentric and eccentric contraction: a comparison between healthy subjects and patients with chronic low-back pain. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[19]  N. Kahanovitz,et al.  Limited Surgical Discectomy and Microdiscectomy: A Clinical Comparison , 1989, Spine.

[20]  H. Flor,et al.  Efficacy of multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: a meta-analytic review , 1992, Pain.

[21]  R. S. Rosomoff,et al.  Does nonsurgical pain center treatment of chronic pain return patients to work? A review and meta-analysis of the literature. , 1994, Spine.

[22]  G. McIntosh,et al.  Effect of Discharge Recommendations on Outcome , 1994, Spine.

[23]  G. Smidt,et al.  Factors contributing to the regulation and clinical assessment of muscular strength. , 1982, Physical therapy.

[24]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Spinal Stability and Intersegmental Muscle Forces: A Biomechanical Model , 1989, Spine.

[25]  D. Chaffin,et al.  Can Biomechanically Determined Stress be Perceived? , 1993 .

[26]  A. E. Chapman,et al.  The strength of the flexor and extensor muscles of the trunk. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  U. Moritz,et al.  Trunk muscle strength and back muscle endurance in construction workers with and without low back disorders. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[28]  D G Wilder,et al.  Epidemiologic Studies of Low-Back Pain , 1980, Spine.

[29]  W. L. Norton Chemonucleolysis Versus Surgical Discectomy: Comparison of Costs and Results in Workers' Compensation Claimants , 1986, Spine.

[30]  V. Mooney,et al.  Spinal Pain Rehabilitation: Inpatient and Outpatient Treatment Results and Development of Predictors for Outcome , 1984, Spine.

[31]  L. Herron,et al.  Changes in MMPI Profiles After Low‐Back Surgery , 1982, Spine.

[32]  V K Goel,et al.  A combined finite element and optimization investigation of lumbar spine mechanics with and without muscles. , 1993, Spine.

[33]  Robert J. Gatchel,et al.  Quantification of Lumbar Function , 1985 .

[34]  Shrawan Kumar,et al.  Human Trunk Strength Profile in Flexion and Extension , 1995, Spine.

[35]  M M Panjabi,et al.  The Effect of Injury on Rotational Coupling at the Lumbosacral Joint: A Biomechanical Investigation , 1992, Spine.

[36]  D G Wilder,et al.  The biomechanics of lumbar disc herniation and the effect of overload and instability. , 1988, Journal of spinal disorders.

[37]  C. Jenkins Work for all : Scan Cooney 127 + iv pages (Dublin, Eire, Inforecast, 1985) , 1985 .

[38]  M. Järvinen,et al.  The Multifidus Muscle in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Histochemical and Morphometric Analysis of Intraoperative Biopsies , 1986, Spine.

[39]  N. Langrana,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Back Strength Using Isokinetic Testing , 1984, Spine.

[40]  Trunk Strengths in Patients Seeking Hospitalization for Chronic Low‐Back Disorders , 1980, Spine.

[41]  G. Smidt,et al.  Assessment of Abdominal and Back Extensor Function: A Quantitative Approach and Results for Chronic Low‐Back Patients , 1983, Spine.

[42]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Effects of Disc Injury on Mechanical Behavior of the Human Spine , 1984, Spine.

[43]  J. Kelsey,et al.  An Epidemiologic Study of Non-Occupational Lifting as a Risk Factor for Herniated Lumbar Intervertebral Disc , 1993, Spine.

[44]  The balance point of the intervertebral motion segment: an experimental study. , 1989, Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute.

[45]  S. P. Chow,et al.  Anterior spinal fusion or deranged lumbar intervertebral disc. , 1980, Spine.

[46]  M. Moore Endorphins and Exercise: A Puzzling Relationship. , 1982, The Physician and sportsmedicine.

[47]  R. Large,et al.  Follow-up results from a randomised controlled trial evaluating in- and outpatient pain management programmes , 1992, Pain.

[48]  W. Karwowski,et al.  Weight Discriminability and Subjective Assessment of Load Heaviness: A Pilot Study , 1989 .

[49]  W. Marras,et al.  Flexibility and velocity of the normal and impaired lumbar spine. , 1986, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[50]  L. Klenerman,et al.  The Prediction of Chronicity in Patients With an Acute Attack of Low Back Pain in a General Practice Setting , 1995, Spine.

[51]  J. Frymoyer,et al.  Disc Excision and Spine Fusion in the Management of Lumbar Disc Disease: A Minimum Ten-Year Followup , 1978, Spine.

[52]  B. Falck,et al.  The Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Five Years After Surgery for a Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation , 1993, Spine.

[53]  P A Costigan,et al.  Trunk Muscle Balance and Muscular Force , 1987, Spine.

[54]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Euler stability of the human ligamentous lumbar spine. Part II: Experiment. , 1992, Clinical biomechanics.

[55]  G. Smidt,et al.  Analysis of Strength Tests and Resistive Exercises Commonly Used for Low-back Disorders , 1987, Spine.

[56]  W E Garrett,et al.  Recovery of skeletal muscle after laceration and repair. , 1984, The Journal of hand surgery.

[57]  J. Gallagher,et al.  Surgery in lumbar disc protrusion--a long-term follow-up. , 1983, Irish medical journal.

[58]  Y K Liu,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Lumbar Spinal Motion Segments as Affected by Partial Disc Removal , 1986, Spine.

[59]  H. Alaranta,et al.  Factors Predicting the Result of Surgery for Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation , 1987, Spine.

[60]  Reid Jg,et al.  Trunk muscle balance and muscular force. , 1987 .

[61]  T. Mayer,et al.  Comparison of CT Scan Muscle Measurements and Isokinetic Trunk Strength in Postoperative Patients , 1989, Spine.

[62]  A. Nachemson Work for all. For those with low back pain as well. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[63]  T. Mayer,et al.  Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year follow-up. , 1985, Spine.

[64]  B. E. Finneson A Lumbar Disc Surgery Predictive Score Card , 1978, Spine.

[65]  S. Kikuchi,et al.  A New Method of Quantitative Measurement of Abdominal and Back Muscle Strength , 1980, Spine.

[66]  L HULT,et al.  Cervical, dorsal and lumbar spinal syndromes; a field investigation of a non-selected material of 1200 workers in different occupations with special reference to disc degeneration and so-called muscular rheumatism. , 1954, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[67]  S. Endo,et al.  A Quantitative Study of Trunk Muscle Strength and Fatigability in the Low- Back-Pain Syndrome , 1983, Spine.

[68]  D. Long Decision making in lumbar disc disease. , 1992, Clinical neurosurgery.

[69]  J R Potvin,et al.  Trunk Muscle and Lumbar Ligament Contributions to Dynamic Lifts with Varying Degrees of Trunk Flexion , 1991, Spine.

[70]  S. Smith,et al.  Quantification of Lumbar Function: Part 2: Sagittal Plane Trunk Strength in Chronic Low-Back Pain Patients , 1985, Spine.

[71]  P. Harmon Anterior excision and vertebral body fusion operation for intervertebral disk syndromes of the lower lumbar spine: three-to five-year results in 244 cases. , 1963, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[72]  S. P. Chow,et al.  Anterior Spinal Fusion for Deranged Lumbar Intervertebral Disc: A Review of 97 Cases , 1980 .

[73]  R. N. Stauffer,et al.  Anterior interbody lumbar spine fusion. Analysis of Mayo Clinic series. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[74]  Wong Sk,et al.  A description of a technic and evaluation of results in anterior spinal fusion for deranged intervertebral disk and spondylolisthesis. , 1968 .

[75]  T. Paakkala,et al.  Posterior fusion of the lumbosacral spine. Evaluation of the operative results and the factors influencing them. , 1979, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[76]  K. Tallroth,et al.  Fat content of lumbar extensor muscles and low back disability: a radiographic and clinical comparison. , 1993, Journal of spinal disorders.