Intuitions About Declining Marginal Utility

In two studies, subjects judged the desirability of distributions of life expectancy or money. Their judgments showed declining marginal utility. That is, they were less sensitive to changes at the high end of each scale. Subjects also made utility ratings of the outcomes of individuals. And they made ratings of the distributions when these were described in terms of utility ratings rather than goods (years or dollars). The judgments of utility ratings showed equivalent declining marginal utility, even though they were based on utilities that themselves declined marginally. People extend their intuition about declining marginal utility to utility itself, as if utility had utility that declined marginally. In one experiment, a similar result was found with gambles: people are risk averse for utility as well as for money. We argue that this is an overextension of a reasonable heuristic and that this heuristic may account for one classic objection to utilitarian distributions.

[1]  John C. Harsanyi,et al.  Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-taking , 1953, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Richard de Neufville,et al.  A Model of the Influence of Certainty and Probability “Effects” on the Measurement of Utility , 1988 .

[3]  E. Galanter,et al.  Cross Modality Matching of Money against Other Continua. , 1974 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[5]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Empirical and theoretical relationships between value and utility functions , 1984 .

[6]  S. Scheffler Consequentialism and its critics , 1988 .

[7]  P. Wakker,et al.  A Criticism of Healthy-years Equivalents , 1996, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[8]  Roman Krzysztofowicz,et al.  Strength of preference and risk attitude in utility measurement , 1983 .

[9]  J. L. Pinto,et al.  Incorporating societal concerns for fairness in numerical valuations of health programmes. , 1999, Health economics.

[10]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[11]  J. Richardson,et al.  Cost utility analysis: what should be measured? , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[12]  J. Baron Thinking and Deciding , 2023 .

[13]  E. Rowland Theory of Games and Economic Behavior , 1946, Nature.

[14]  E. Nord The Person-trade-off Approach to Valuing Health Care Programs , 1995, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[15]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[16]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Experiences extended across time: Evaluation of moments and episodes , 1992 .

[17]  E. E. Hoyt The Economic Development of Nicaragua. , 1953 .

[18]  J. Baron Thinking and deciding, 3rd ed. , 2000 .

[19]  A. Wengraf,et al.  Consequentialism and its Critics , 1992 .