DNA electrophoresis in microlithographic arrays

WE have used optical microlithography to fabricate capped quasi-two-dimensional obstacle courses in SiO2. We report here observations using epifluorescence microscopy of the electrophoresis and length fractionation of large DNA molecules confined in arrays. Simple reptation theory, based on the work of deGennes1, predicts that at low electric fields the electrophoretic mobility of a polymer of length L much greater than the persistence length p scales inversely with L (ref. 2). But elongation of the coil in the matrix at sufficiently strong electric fields3 results in a length-independent electrophoretic mobility4,5. The application of suitably timed pulsed electric fields restores the fractionating power of gels for long molecules6 but the protocols of pulsed-field electrophoresis are semi-empirical because the complex and ill-understood gel matrix plays a critical role in fractionation. Microlithographically constructed obstacle arrays, with their low dimensionality, small volume and extremely reproducible topography, will make it possible to understand the motion and fractionation of large polymer molecules in complex but well characterized topologies.

[1]  Gerald S. Manning,et al.  Limiting Laws and Counterion Condensation in Polyelectrolyte Solutions I. Colligative Properties , 1969 .

[2]  G. Wallis,et al.  Field Assisted Glass‐Metal Sealing , 1969 .

[3]  P. Gennes.  Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics , 1979 .

[4]  K Morikawa,et al.  Visualization of individual DNA molecules in solution by light microscopy: DAPI staining method. , 1981, Journal of biochemistry.

[5]  H. Frisch,et al.  Why does the electrophoretic mobility of DNA in gels vary with the length of the molecule? , 1982, Biopolymers.

[6]  D. Schwartz,et al.  Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresis , 1984, Cell.

[7]  B. Zimm,et al.  Theory of gel electrophoresis of DNA , 1985, Biopolymers.

[8]  C. P. Bean,et al.  Electrophoretic mobility of λ phage HIND III and HAE III DNA fragments in agarose gels: A detailed study , 1987 .

[9]  Theoretical studies of DNA during gel electrophoresis. , 1989, Science.

[10]  P. Hagerman.  Flexibility of DNA. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[11]  G. Slater,et al.  Scrambling of bands in gel electrophoresis of DNA. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  David C. Schwartz,et al.  Conformational dynamics of individual DNA molecules during gel electrophoresis , 1989, Nature.

[13]  P. Serwer,et al.  Sieving of double‐stranded DNA during agarose gel electrophoresis , 1989, Electrophoresis.

[14]  J. Callis,et al.  Observation of individual DNA molecules undergoing gel electrophoresis. , 1989, Science.

[15]  J. Michael Schurr,et al.  Theory for the extension of a linear polyelectrolyte attached at one end in an electric field , 1990 .

[16]  E. Davis,et al.  Moving boundary electrophoresis of concentrated suspensions and electroosmosis in porous media , 1990 .

[17]  N. Stellwagen,et al.  The electric field dependence of DNA mobilities in agarose gels: A reinvestigation , 1990, Electrophoresis.

[18]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Direct observation and manipulation of single DNA molecules using fluorescence microscopy. , 1991, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[19]  M. Maestre,et al.  Unhooking dynamics of U-shaped DNA molecule undergoing gel electrophoresis. , 1991, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.