Application of the LEED PRM to an Italian existing building

ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings except Low-Rise Residential Buildings is the benchmark code of U.S. local regulations. In addition to provide a set of minimum mandatory requirements for energy-using components (prescriptive approach), the standard includes in the Appendix G a more flexible path to attest performances significantly better than code minimum (performance-based approach). With regard to this approach, a procedure to establish the proposed building performance by quantifying the energy savings above an annual baseline energy consumption is defined as Performance Rating Method and used within the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Protocol. This paper applies the U.S. performance-based approach to the global energy efficiency goal within the prescriptive-oriented Italian framework. In particular, the Performance Rating Method – partially customized to the Italian context by GBC Italia® and in compliance with LEED Italia requirements – has been applied to an Italian case study in order to highlight strengths and weaknesses correlated to a steady adoption of the performance approach in Italian energy policies. The proposed building performance of the case study has been evaluated throughout a dynamic simulation analysis carried out by means of the EnergyPlus code.

[1]  Konstantinos Papamichael,et al.  Decision-making through performance simulation and code compliance from the early, schematic phases of building design , 2003 .

[2]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  The “extended building energy hub”: A new method for the simultaneous optimization of energy demand and energy supply in buildings , 2012, HVAC&R Research.

[3]  Ping Jiang,et al.  Analysis of national and local energy-efficiency design standards in the public building sector in China , 2011 .

[4]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  An hourly modelling framework for the assessment of energy sources exploitation and energy converters selection and sizing in buildings , 2009 .

[5]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review of HVAC systems requirements in building energy regulations , 2011 .

[6]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  The importation of building environmental certification systems: international usages of BREEAM and LEED , 2013 .

[7]  Chris Pyke,et al.  Implications of trends in LEED usage: rating system design and market transformation , 2013 .

[8]  Jeong Tai Kim,et al.  Building Environmental Assessment Schemes for Rating of IAQ in Sustainable Buildings , 2011 .

[9]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Measures of Anchoring in Estimation Tasks , 1995 .

[10]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  Trade-off between environmental and economic objectives in the optimization of multi-energy systems , 2009 .

[11]  Neveen Hamza,et al.  Energy conservation regulations: Impacts on design and procurement of low energy buildings , 2009 .

[12]  Rongxin Yin,et al.  Energy modeling of two office buildings with data center for green building design , 2008 .

[13]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Building environmental assessment methods: redefining intentions and roles , 2005 .

[14]  Caio Frederico e Silva,et al.  ENERGY EFFICIENCY CODE IN BRAZIL: EXPERIENCES IN THE FIRST PUBLIC BUILDING LABELED IN BRASILIA , 2010 .

[15]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  A close look at the China Design Standard for Energy Efficiency of Public Buildings , 2009 .

[16]  Leidy E. Klotz,et al.  Unintended anchors: Building rating systems and energy performance goals for U.S. buildings , 2010 .

[17]  Enrico Fabrizio,et al.  Reference buildings for cost optimal analysis: Method of definition and application , 2013 .

[18]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .