An information-based machine learning approach to elasticity imaging

An information-based technique is described for applications in mechanical property imaging of soft biological media under quasi-static loads. We adapted the Autoprogressive method that was originally developed for civil engineering applications for this purpose. The Autoprogressive method is a computational technique that combines knowledge of object shape and a sparse distribution of force and displacement measurements with finite-element analyses and artificial neural networks to estimate a complete set of stress and strain vectors. Elasticity imaging parameters are then computed from estimated stresses and strains. We introduce the technique using ultrasonic pulse-echo measurements in simple gelatin imaging phantoms having linear-elastic properties so that conventional finite-element modeling can be used to validate results. The Autoprogressive algorithm does not require any assumptions about the material properties and can, in principle, be used to image media with arbitrary properties. We show that by selecting a few well-chosen force–displacement measurements that are appropriately applied during training and establish convergence, we can estimate all nontrivial stress and strain vectors throughout an object and accurately estimate an elastic modulus at high spatial resolution. This new method of modeling the mechanical properties of tissue-like materials introduces a unique method of solving the inverse problem and is the first technique for imaging stress without assuming the underlying constitutive model.

[1]  Martin A. Riedmiller,et al.  A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm , 1993, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks.

[2]  Faouzi Kallel,et al.  Tissue elasticity reconstruction using linear perturbation method , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[3]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  New nested adaptive neural networks (NANN) for constitutive modeling , 1998 .

[4]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Autoprogressive training of neural network constitutive models , 1998 .

[5]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Numerical implementation of a neural network based material model in finite element analysis , 2004 .

[6]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  Real-Time Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis for Surgical Simulation Using Graphics Processing Units , 2007, MICCAI.

[7]  Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.  Advances in Neural Networks in Computational Mechanics and Engineering , 2010 .

[8]  Marko Orescanin,et al.  Shear modulus estimation with vibrating needle stimulation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Gregory D. Hager,et al.  Real-Time Regularized Ultrasound Elastography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  R. Barr Elastography in clinical practice. , 2014, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[11]  Mohit Tyagi,et al.  Algorithms for quantitative quasi‐static elasticity imaging using force data , 2014, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[12]  Soh-Khim Ong,et al.  Real-time finite element structural analysis in augmented reality , 2015, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[13]  Cameron Hoerig,et al.  Informational modeling of tissue-like materials using ultrasound , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[14]  Cameron Hoerig,et al.  A new approach to ultrasonic elasticity imaging , 2016, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Nahil Sobh,et al.  Indentation Measurements to Validate Dynamic Elasticity Imaging Methods , 2016, Ultrasonic imaging.

[16]  Mahmoud Derakhshan Horeh Real-time Regularized Tracking of Shear-Wave inUltrasound Elastography , 2017 .