Deterministic Approximation Algorithms for the Nearest Codeword Problem

The Nearest Codeword Problem (NCP) is a basic algorithmic question in the theory of error-correcting codes. Given a point $v \in \mathbb{F}_2^n$ and a linear space $L\subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^n$ of dimension k NCP asks to find a point l *** L that minimizes the (Hamming) distance from v . It is well-known that the nearest codeword problem is NP-hard. Therefore approximation algorithms are of interest. The best efficient approximation algorithms for the NCP to date are due to Berman and Karpinski. They are a deterministic algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio of O (k /c ) for an arbitrary constant c , and a randomized algorithm that achieves an approximation ratio of O (k /logn ). In this paper we present new deterministic algorithms for approximating the NCP that improve substantially upon the earlier work. Specifically, we obtain: A polynomial time O (n /logn )-approximation algorithm; An n O (s ) time O (k log(s ) n / logn )-approximation algorithm, where log(s ) n stands for s iterations of log, e.g., log(2) n = loglogn ; An $n^{O(\log^* n)}$ time O (k /logn )-approximation algorithm. We also initiate a study of the following Remote Point Problem (RPP). Given a linear space $L\subseteq \mathbb{F}_2^n$ of dimension k RPP asks to find a point $v\in \mathbb{F}_2^n$ that is far from L . We say that an algorithm achieves a remoteness of r for the RPP if it always outputs a point v that is at least r -far from L . In this paper we present a deterministic polynomial time algorithm that achieves a remoteness of ***(n logk / k ) for all k ≤ n /2. We motivate the remote point problem by relating it to both the nearest codeword problem and the matrix rigidity approach to circuit lower bounds in computational complexity theory.

[1]  A. Razborov,et al.  Improved lower bounds on the rigidity of Hadamard matrices , 1998 .

[2]  Jacques Stern,et al.  The hardness of approximate optima in lattices, codes, and systems of linear equations , 1993, Proceedings of 1993 IEEE 34th Annual Foundations of Computer Science.

[3]  Guy Kindler,et al.  Approximating CVP to Within Almost-Polynomial Factors is NP-Hard , 1998, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[4]  Venkatesan Guruswami,et al.  The complexity of the covering radius problem , 2004, Proceedings. 19th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity, 2004..

[5]  Satyanarayana V. Lokam Spectral Methods for Matrix Rigidity with Applications to Size-Depth Trade-offs and Communication Complexity , 2001, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[6]  Michael Alekhnovich More on Average Case vs Approximation Complexity , 2011, computational complexity.

[7]  Joel Friedman,et al.  A note on matrix rigidity , 1993, Comb..

[8]  Madhu Sudan,et al.  Hardness of approximating the minimum distance of a linear code , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[9]  Guy Kindler,et al.  Approximating CVP to Within Almost-Polynomial Factors is NP-Hard , 2003, Proceedings 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (Cat. No.98CB36280).

[10]  Marek Karpinski,et al.  Approximating minimum unsatisfiability of linear equations , 2002, SODA '02.

[11]  Daniel A. Spielman,et al.  A Remark on Matrix Rigidity , 1997, Inf. Process. Lett..

[12]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Graph-Theoretic Arguments in Low-Level Complexity , 1977, MFCS.