Optical lattice experiments at unobserved conditions with generative adversarial deep learning

Optical lattice experiments with ultracold atoms allow for the experimental realization of contemporary problems in many-body physics. Yet, devising models that faithfully describe experimental observables is often difficult and problem dependent; there is currently no theoretical method which accounts for all experimental observations. Leveraging the large data volume and presence of strong correlations, machine learning provides a novel avenue for the study of such systems. It has recently been proven successful in analyzing properties of experimental data of ultracold quantum gases. Here we show that generative deep learning succeeds in the challenging task of modeling such an experimental data distribution. Our method is able to produce synthetic experimental snapshots of a doped two-dimensional Fermi-Hubbard model that are indistinguishable from previously reported experimental realizations. We demonstrate how our generative model interprets physical conditions such as temperature at the level of individual configurations. We use our approach to predict snapshots at conditions and scales which are currently experimentally inaccessible, mapping the large-scale behavior of optical lattices at unseen conditions.

[1]  Aaron C. Courville,et al.  Generative Adversarial Networks , 2022, 2023 14th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT).

[2]  R. Scalettar,et al.  Visualizing strange metallic correlations in the two-dimensional Fermi-Hubbard model with artificial intelligence , 2020, Physical Review A.

[3]  S. Pilati,et al.  Scalable neural networks for the efficient learning of disordered quantum systems. , 2020, Physical review. E.

[4]  G. Ness,et al.  Single-exposure absorption imaging of ultracold atoms using deep learning , 2020, ArXiv.

[5]  F. Noé,et al.  Boltzmann generators: Sampling equilibrium states of many-body systems with deep learning , 2019, Science.

[6]  J. Cirac,et al.  Restricted Boltzmann machines in quantum physics , 2019, Nature Physics.

[7]  Dario Poletti,et al.  Transfer learning for scalability of neural-network quantum states. , 2019, Physical review. E.

[8]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  Machine-Learning Quantum States in the NISQ Era , 2019, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics.

[9]  F. Verstraete,et al.  Restricted Boltzmann Machines for Quantum States with Non-Abelian or Anyonic Symmetries. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[10]  Naftali Tishby,et al.  Machine learning and the physical sciences , 2019, Reviews of Modern Physics.

[11]  Michael Knap,et al.  Classifying snapshots of the doped Hubbard model with machine learning , 2018, Nature Physics.

[12]  Jan M. Pawlowski,et al.  Reducing autocorrelation times in lattice simulations with generative adversarial networks , 2018, Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol..

[13]  L. Pang,et al.  Regressive and generative neural networks for scalar field theory , 2018, Physical Review D.

[14]  Michael Knap,et al.  String patterns in the doped Hubbard model , 2018, Science.

[15]  Christoph Becker,et al.  Identifying quantum phase transitions using artificial neural networks on experimental data , 2018, Nature Physics.

[16]  S. Pilati,et al.  Supervised machine learning of ultracold atoms with speckle disorder , 2018, Scientific reports.

[17]  Leland McInnes,et al.  UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[18]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Machine learning in electronic-quantum-matter imaging experiments , 2018, Nature.

[19]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Inverse molecular design using machine learning: Generative models for matter engineering , 2018, Science.

[20]  G. Carleo,et al.  Symmetries and Many-Body Excitations with Neural-Network Quantum States. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[21]  C Casert,et al.  Interpretable machine learning for inferring the phase boundaries in a nonequilibrium system. , 2018, Physical review. E.

[22]  Han Zhang,et al.  Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networks , 2018, ICML.

[23]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Neural-network quantum state tomography , 2017, Nature Physics.

[24]  Xiang Wei,et al.  Improving the Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs: A Consistency Term and Its Dual Effect , 2018, ICLR.

[25]  Annabelle Bohrdt,et al.  Parton theory of magnetic polarons: Mesonic resonances and signatures in dynamics , 2017, 1712.01874.

[26]  Isaac Tamblyn,et al.  Phase space sampling and operator confidence with generative adversarial networks , 2017, 1710.08053.

[27]  Zhaocheng Liu,et al.  Simulating the Ising Model with a Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network , 2017, 1710.04987.

[28]  I. Bloch,et al.  Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices , 2017, Science.

[29]  Amir Barati Farimani,et al.  Deep Learning the Physics of Transport Phenomena , 2017, ArXiv.

[30]  Léon Bottou,et al.  Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Networks , 2017, ICML.

[31]  Ye-Hua Liu,et al.  Discriminative Cooperative Networks for Detecting Phase Transitions. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[32]  E. Demler,et al.  A cold-atom Fermi–Hubbard antiferromagnet , 2016, Nature.

[33]  Manuel Scherzer,et al.  Machine Learning of Explicit Order Parameters: From the Ising Model to SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theory , 2017, 1705.05582.

[34]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  Kernel methods for interpretable machine learning of order parameters , 2017, 1704.05848.

[35]  Aaron C. Courville,et al.  Improved Training of Wasserstein GANs , 2017, NIPS.

[36]  Hyunsoo Kim,et al.  Learning to Discover Cross-Domain Relations with Generative Adversarial Networks , 2017, ICML.

[37]  Immanuel Bloch,et al.  Revealing hidden antiferromagnetic correlations in doped Hubbard chains via string correlators , 2017, Science.

[38]  Luke de Oliveira,et al.  Learning Particle Physics by Example: Location-Aware Generative Adversarial Networks for Physics Synthesis , 2017, Computing and Software for Big Science.

[39]  S. Huber,et al.  Learning phase transitions by confusion , 2016, Nature Physics.

[40]  Christian Ledig,et al.  Photo-Realistic Single Image Super-Resolution Using a Generative Adversarial Network , 2016, 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[41]  R. Melko,et al.  Machine Learning Phases of Strongly Correlated Fermions , 2016, Physical Review X.

[42]  Matthias Troyer,et al.  Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks , 2016, Science.

[43]  M. Greiner,et al.  Site-resolved measurement of the spin-correlation function in the Fermi-Hubbard model , 2016, Science.

[44]  Roger G. Melko,et al.  Machine learning phases of matter , 2016, Nature Physics.

[45]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[46]  M. R. Norman,et al.  From quantum matter to high-temperature superconductivity in copper oxides , 2015, Nature.

[47]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[48]  Simon Osindero,et al.  Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, ArXiv.

[49]  F. Nori,et al.  Quantum Simulation , 2013, Quantum Atom Optics.

[50]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors , 2012, ArXiv.

[51]  T. Esslinger Fermi-Hubbard Physics with Atoms in an Optical Lattice , 2010, 1007.0012.

[52]  J. Dalibard,et al.  Many-Body Physics with Ultracold Gases , 2007, 0704.3011.

[53]  M. Lewenstein,et al.  Ultracold atomic gases in optical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond , 2006, cond-mat/0606771.

[54]  N. Nagaosa,et al.  Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity , 2004, cond-mat/0410445.

[55]  Kyle Mills Deep neural networks for direct, featureless learning through observation: the case of 2d spin models , 2018 .