Combined Use of Jute Geotextile-EPS Geofoam to Protect Flexible Buried Pipes: Experimental and Numerical Studies

This paper addresses the results of the experimental and numerical studies conducted on 4.2 mm thickness and 110 mm diameter high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes buried in fly ash material overlying stone dust beds. The model tests were performed using single and double layers of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam as compressible inclusions. In addition to that, jute geotextile was used as a reinforcement for the infill fly ash along with EPS geofoam inclusion to obtain induced trench condition. The test beds were subjected to loading on the fly ash surface with the help of a rigid steel plate to simulate as a strip footing in different embedment depths of the pipe (1–3 times pipe diameter). The test results revealed that the pressure and strain values in the pipe reduced significantly in the presence of EPS geofoam and jute geotextile related to the location of the pipe. In the case of double layers of EPS geofoam could induce reduction of the pressure up to 87.2% and strain about 63.5% respectively depending on the density and width of EPS geofoam. Whereas, at the same burial depth, in the presence of jute geotextile together with EPS geofoam can be reduced up to 93.8 and 73.4% for pressure and strain respectively depending on EPS geofoam density and number of reinforcement. Moreover, the jute geotextile-EPS geofoam combination of model test results were validated with finite element program. A good agreement was observed on pressure-settlement response and pipe strain between experimental and numerical investigations. The numerical studies show that the jute geotextile distributes stresses in the lateral direction and then the stresses on the pipe significantly reduced.

[1]  A. H. Padade,et al.  Numerical Simulation of EPS Geofoam as Compressible Inclusions in Fly Ash Backfill Retaining Walls , 2014 .

[2]  Richard W I Brachman,et al.  Measured deformations and calculated stresses of high-density polyethylene pipes under very deep burial , 2009 .

[3]  A. F. Witthoeft,et al.  Numerical investigation of earth pressure reduction on buried pipes using EPS geofoam compressible inclusions , 2016 .

[4]  D. T. Bergado,et al.  Interaction between geogrid reinforcement and tire chip-sand lightweight backfill , 2010 .

[5]  Rp McAffee,et al.  Geotechnical Properties of Compressible Materials Used for Induced Trench Construction , 2004 .

[6]  Fei Wang,et al.  Performance of buried HDPE pipes – part I: peaking deflection during initial backfilling process , 2017 .

[7]  Yun Wook Choo,et al.  Remediation for buried pipeline systems under permanent ground deformation , 2007 .

[8]  John S. Horvath,et al.  Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) geofoam: An introduction to material behavior , 1994 .

[9]  Andrew Dawson,et al.  Buried Pipes in Rubber-Soil Backfilled Trenches under Cyclic Loading , 2012 .

[10]  Guowei Ma,et al.  Coupled time domain integration algorithm for numerical manifold method , 2017 .

[11]  S N Moghadas Tafreshi,et al.  Analysis of Buried Plastic Pipes in Reinforced Sand under Repeated-Load Using Neural Network and Regression Model , 2007 .

[12]  Steven F. Bartlett,et al.  Methods of protecting buried pipelines and culverts in transportation infrastructure using EPS geofoam , 2015 .

[13]  J. Mandal,et al.  Compression creep test on expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam , 2016 .

[14]  G. E. Abdelrahman,et al.  BEHAVIOR IMPROVEMENT OF FOOTINGS ON SOFT CLAY UTILIZING GEOFOAM , 2006 .

[15]  J. Mandal,et al.  Numerical Analyses on Cellular Mattress–Reinforced Fly Ash Beds Overlying Soft Clay , 2017 .

[16]  Thomas F. Zimmie,et al.  Numerical and physical modeling of geofoam barriers as protection against effects of surface blast on underground tunnels , 2016 .

[17]  Takashi Sakanoue,et al.  Experimental Study on Soil-Pipeline Interaction Using EPS Backfill , 2003 .

[18]  M Duskov Three-dimensional finite element analysis of flexible pavements with an (open joint in the) EPS sub-base , 1997 .

[19]  Steven F. Bartlett,et al.  Rapid Construction and Settlement Behavior of Embankment Systems on Soft Foundation Soils , 2008 .

[20]  Mohamed A. Meguid,et al.  Earth Pressure Distribution on a Rigid Box Covered with U-Shaped Geofoam Wrap , 2017 .

[21]  Jan Vaslestad,et al.  LOAD REDUCTION ON RIGID CULVERTS BENEATH HIGH FILLS: LONG-TERM BEHAVIOR , 1993 .

[22]  Amalendu Ghosh,et al.  Bearing capacity of square footing on pond ash reinforced with jute-geotextile , 2005 .

[23]  Mustafa Aytekin,et al.  Laboratory study of expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam used with expansive soils , 2008 .

[24]  Tommy C. Hopkins,et al.  Stress Reduction by Ultra-Lightweight Geofoam for High Fill Culvert: Numerical Analysis , 2005 .

[25]  Yudhbir,et al.  Geotechnical Characterization of Some Indian Fly Ashes , 2005 .

[26]  J. N. Mandal,et al.  Bearing capacity tests on geogrid-reinforced clay , 1992 .

[27]  G Beinbrech EPS in road construction—Current situation in Germany , 1997 .

[28]  Bret N. Lingwall,et al.  Protection of Pipelines and Buried Structures Using EPS Geofoam , 2014 .

[30]  Shenbaga R. Kaniraj,et al.  Correlation Analysis of Laboratory Compaction of Fly Ashes , 2001 .

[31]  John S. Horvath Using geosynthetics to reduce earth loads on rigid retaining structures , 1991 .

[32]  B. Grieveson,et al.  DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE EMBANKMENTS , 1995 .

[33]  E. Beer,et al.  Experimental Determination of the Shape Factors and the Bearing Capacity Factors of Sand , 1970 .

[34]  J. Mandal,et al.  Model Studies on Geocell-Reinforced Fly Ash Bed Overlying Soft Clay , 2016 .

[35]  R. Janardhanam,et al.  Mix Design for Flowable Fly‐Ash Backfill Material , 1992 .

[36]  Andrew Dawson,et al.  Combined use of geocell reinforcement and rubber–soil mixtures to improve performance of buried pipes , 2012 .

[37]  Benjamin A. Erickson,et al.  Finite-element Analysis of Lateral Pressures on Rigid Non-yielding Retaining Walls with EPS Geofoam Inclusion , 2010 .

[38]  J. Kim,et al.  Reduction of Earth Pressure on Buried Pipes by EPS Geofoam Inclusions , 2010 .

[39]  G. Ghataora,et al.  USE OF PULVERIZED FUEL ASH IN TRENCH BACKFILL , 2000 .

[40]  John S. Horvath,et al.  The compressible inclusion function of EPS geofoam , 1997 .

[41]  J. Mandal,et al.  Expanded Polystyrene Geofoam Based Cellular Reinforcement , 2016 .

[42]  Mohamed A. Meguid,et al.  A Numerical Procedure for the Assessment of Contact Pressures on Buried Structures Overlain by EPS Geofoam Inclusion , 2017 .

[43]  Mustafa Aytekin Numerical modeling of EPS geofoam used with swelling soil , 1997 .

[44]  J. Mandal,et al.  Model Tests on Geocell Walls Under Strip Loading , 2014 .

[45]  M. Arockiasamy,et al.  Full-Scale Field Tests on Flexible Pipes under Live Load Application , 2006 .

[46]  C. J. Leo,et al.  Behaviour of EPS Geofoam as Flexible Pavement Subgrade Material in Model Tests , 2000 .

[47]  M Duskov MEASUREMENTS ON A FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT STRUCTURE WITH AN EPS GEOFOAM SUB-BASE , 1997 .

[48]  S.M.M.M. Hosseini,et al.  Soil-structure interaction of buried pipes under cyclic loading conditions , 2000 .

[49]  A. Porbaha,et al.  TIME EFFECT ON SHEAR STRENGTH AND PERMEABILITY OF FLY ASH , 2000 .

[50]  Mohamed A. Meguid,et al.  Investigation of soil-geosynthetic-structure interaction associated with induced trench installation , 2017 .

[51]  Dae Seong Kang,et al.  Bearing capacity and settlement of tire-reinforced sands , 2004 .