Traffic pattern based performance comparison of two reactive routing protocols for Ad hoc networks using NS2

Ad hoc networks are characterized by wireless connectivity, continuous changing topology, distributed operations and ease of deployment. Routing in Ad hoc networks is a challenge due to mobility and thus is a current area of research. We compare two reactive routing protocols by considering multiple performance metrics to bring out their relative merits. Both DSR and AODV share similar on demand behavior, but the protocols internal mechanism leads to significant performance differences. We have analyzed the performance of protocols by varying network load, mobility and type of traffic (CBR, TCP). A detailed simulation has been done using NS2. We consider packet delivery fraction, normalized routing load, average delay, routing overhead, and packet loss as metrics for performance analysis of these protocols.

[1]  Sekharjit Datta,et al.  Performance of CBR and TCP Traffics in Various MANET Environments , 2007 .

[2]  P. Chenna Reddy,et al.  Performance Analysis of Adhoc Network Routing Protocols , 2006, 2006 International Symposium on Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing.

[3]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[4]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[5]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Performance comparison of two on-demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks , 2001, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[6]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[7]  Gentian Jakllari,et al.  A Comprehensive Comparison of Routing Protocols for Large-Scale Wireless MANETs , 2006, 2006 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks.

[8]  Hiroaki Higaki,et al.  No-Beacon GEDIR: Location-Based Ad-Hoc Routing with Less Communication Overhead , 2007, Fourth International Conference on Information Technology (ITNG'07).

[9]  Lokanatha C. Reddy,et al.  Performance Comparison of Wireless Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Routing Protocols , 2008 .

[10]  David A. Maltz,et al.  The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol (DSR) for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks for IPv4 , 2007, RFC.

[11]  Joseph P. Macker,et al.  Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations , 1999, RFC.

[12]  Rajendra V. Boppana,et al.  A comparison of TCP performance over three routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[13]  Vincent Park,et al.  Temporally-Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA) Version 1 Functional Specification , 2001 .

[14]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Highly Dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector Routing (DSDV) for mobile computers , 1994, SIGCOMM.

[15]  David B. Johnson,et al.  The Dynamic Source Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2003 .

[16]  A.K. Sharma,et al.  A power managed based multicast routing protocol for mobile ad hoc network , 2006, 2006 IFIP International Conference on Wireless and Optical Communications Networks.