The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits

This paper re-examines the commonly observed inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. We propose that this relationship occurs because people rely on affect when judging the risk and benefit of specific hazards. Evidence supporting this proposal is obtained in two experimental studies. Study 1 investigated the inverse relationship between risk and benefit judgments under a time-pressure condition designed to limit the use of analytic thought and enhance the reliance on affect. As expected, the inverse relationship was strengthened when time pressure was introduced. Study 2 tested and confirmed the hypothesis that providing information designed to alter the favorability of one's overall affective evaluation of an item (say nuclear power) would systematically change the risk and benefit judgments for that item. Both studies suggest that people seem prone to using an ‘affect heuristic’ which improves judgmental efficiency by deriving both risk and benefit evaluations from a common source—affective reactions to the stimulus item. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[2]  O. Mowrer.  Learning theory and the symbolic processes. , 1962 .

[3]  J. H. Curtis,et al.  Learning Theory and Behavior , 1960 .

[4]  A. Tversky.  Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. , 1972 .

[5]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[6]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[7]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .

[8]  R. Zajonc.  Feeling and thinking : Preferences need no inferences , 1980 .

[9]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making* , 1983 .

[10]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[11]  Daniel N. Osherson,et al.  An advantage model of choice , 1989 .

[12]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: conformity, complexity, and bolstering. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Risk Perception of Prescription Drugs: Report on a Survey in Sweden , 1989 .

[14]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Choices and judgments of incompletely described decision alternatives under time pressure , 1990 .

[15]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. , 1992 .

[16]  E. Stern,et al.  How attitudes guide memory-based judgments: A two-process model , 1992 .

[17]  Eldar Shafir,et al.  Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.

[18]  John W. Payne,et al.  The adaptive decision maker: Name index , 1993 .

[19]  O. Svenson,et al.  Judgment and Decision Making Under Time Pressure , 1993 .

[20]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[21]  S. Epstein.  Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. , 1994, The American psychologist.

[22]  P. Slovic,et al.  A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. , 1994, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[23]  Bernd Rohrmann,et al.  Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and crossnational comparisons , 1994 .

[24]  Johanna Helena Kerstholt,et al.  The effect of time pressure on decision-making behaviour in a dynamic task environment , 1994 .

[25]  A. Damasio.  Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[26]  P. Slovic.  The Construction of Preference , 1995 .

[27]  D. Medin,et al.  Decision making from a cognitive perspective , 1995 .

[28]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk Perceptions in Australia , 1996, Psychological Reports.

[29]  A. Dijker,et al.  Stereotyping and attitudinal effects under time pressure , 1996 .

[30]  Lee Roy Beach,et al.  The Effects of Time Constraints on the Prechoice Screening of Decision Options , 1996 .

[31]  P. Slovic,et al.  The Role of Affect and Worldviews as Orienting Dispositions in the Perception and Acceptance of Nuclear Power1 , 1996 .

[32]  P Slovic,et al.  Perception of ecological risk to water environments. , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[33]  Lisa D. Ordóñez,et al.  Decisions under Time Pressure: How Time Constraint Affects Risky Decision Making , 1997 .