Distinctiveness and serial position effects in tonal sequences

The proportion-of-the-total-duration rule (Kidd & Watson, 1992) states that the detectability of a change in a component of a tonal sequence can be predicted by the proportional duration of the changed component relative to the length of the sequence as a whole. A similar viewpoint relies on temporal distinctiveness to account for primacy, recency, and other serial position effects in memory (Murdock, 1960; Neath, 1993a, 1993b). Such distinctiveness models predict that an item will be remembered if it is more distinctive along some dimension relative to possible competitors. Three experiments explored the relation between distinctiveness and proportional duration by examining the effects of the proportion of the total duration of a tone in a sequence, serial position, and interstimulus interval (ISI) on the detection of a change in one component of a tonal sequence. Experiment 1 replicated the basic effect with relatively untrained subjects and a fixed frequency difference. Experiment 2 showed that distinctiveness holds for tonal sequences and a same/different task. Experiment 3 combined the two to show that proportional duration, ISI, and position of the changed tone all contribute to discrimination performance. The present research combines theories that have been proposed in the psychophysics and memory fields and suggests that a comprehensive principle based on relative distinctiveness may be able to account for both perceptual and memory effects.

[1]  Francis M. Wiener,et al.  The Pressure Distribution in the Auditory Canal in a Progressive Sound Field , 1946 .

[2]  J. Harris,et al.  The decline of pitch discrimination with time. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[4]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Individual Choice Behavior , 1959 .

[5]  B. Murdock,et al.  The distinctiveness of stimuli. , 1960, Psychological review.

[6]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Precategorical acoustic storage (PAS) , 1969 .

[8]  D. Pisoni.  Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels , 1973, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Irwin Pollack,et al.  Auditory informational masking , 1975 .

[10]  C S Watson,et al.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. I. Component frequency, temporal position, and silent intervals. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  C S Watson,et al.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  A. Baddeley.  The psychology of memory , 1976 .

[13]  D. M. Green,et al.  Frequency discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  R. Finke.  Levels of equivalence in imagery and perception. , 1980 .

[15]  H. Terrace,et al.  Autoshaping and Conditioning Theory , 1980 .

[16]  C S Watson,et al.  Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. III. Frequency discrimination with components of well-learned patterns. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Drake R Bradley,et al.  Psychophysical Functions for Perceived and Remembered Distance , 1984, Perception.

[18]  R. Shepard.  Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[19]  R. Finke,et al.  Theories relating mental imagery to perception. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  R. Cook,et al.  Memory processing of serial lists by pigeons, monkeys, and people. , 1985, Science.

[21]  A. Glenberg,et al.  A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Temporal factors in the discrimination of tonal sequences. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  C S Watson,et al.  Individual differences in auditory capabilities. I. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Schedules of presentation and temporal distinctiveness in human memory. , 1990 .

[25]  J. S. Nairne.  A feature model of immediate memory , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Perception of temporal patterns defined by tonal sequences. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  C S Watson,et al.  Limits of auditory patterns discrimination for patterns with various durations and numbers of components. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[29]  Effect of time compression and expansion on the discrimination of tonal patterns. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  G. J. Johnson.  A distinctiveness model of serial learning , 1991 .

[31]  D. McFarland,et al.  Assessing short-term recognition memory with forced-choice psychophysical methods , 1992, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  D. McFarland,et al.  Aspects of short-term acoustic recognition memory: modality and serial position effects. , 1992, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[33]  J V Baranski,et al.  The discriminability of remembered magnitudes , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[34]  C S Watson,et al.  The "proportion-of-the-total-duration rule" for the discrimination of auditory patterns. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  R A Lutfi.  A model of auditory pattern analysis based on component-relative-entropy. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  R. G. Crowder.  Systems and Principles in Memory Theory: Another Critique of Pure Memory , 2019, Theories of Memory.

[37]  I. Neath.  Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position function. , 1993 .

[38]  M. Pitt,et al.  Auditory Recency in Immediate Memory , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[39]  I. Neath.  Distinctiveness and serial position effects in recognition , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[40]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The recency effect: Implicit learning with explicit retrieval? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Stimulus‐oriented model for the discrimination of Gaussian noise samples , 1993 .

[42]  Alicia J. Knoedler,et al.  Distinctiveness and Serial Position Effects in Recognition and Sentence Processing , 1994 .

[43]  Effect of sequence delay on the discrimination of temporal patterns. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  R A Lutfi,et al.  Effect of component-relative-entropy on the discrimination of simultaneous tone complexes. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  I Neath,et al.  Remembering and forgetting as context discrimination. , 1995, Learning & memory.

[46]  David J. Murray.  Gestalt Psychology and the Cognitive Revolution , 1995 .

[47]  N. Cowan.  Attention and Memory: An Integrated Framework , 1995 .

[48]  Further comments on proportional duration and proportional variance as factors in auditory pattern discrimination. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  R. G. Crowder,et al.  Distinctiveness and very short-term serial position effects. , 1996, Memory.

[50]  N. Cowan,et al.  The role of absolute and relative amounts of time in forgetting within immediate memory: The case of tone-pitch comparisons , 1997 .

[51]  D. Norris,et al.  The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. , 1998, Psychological review.

[52]  Effect of temporal position, proportional variance, and proportional duration on decision weights in temporal pattern discrimination. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[53]  G D Brown,et al.  Oscillator-based memory for serial order. , 2000, Psychological review.

[54]  S. Saults,et al.  The ravages of absolute and relative amounts of time on memory. , 2001 .