Crime risk evaluation within information sharing between the police and community partners

The aim of this paper is to provide profiles for crimes, profiles that can be used to model the context for information-sharing between the police and community partner organisations. This context can then be integrated with information-sharing syntax used by Single Point of Contact (SPoC) agents to process information sharing requests (Uthmani et al., 2010). The questionnaires attempt to classify crimes into categories, with identifying profiles of crime-types, according to the level of information sharing they necessitate between community partner organisations. Crimes are separated into classifications, which are based on the perceived level of necessary information-exchange among police and community partners. The aim of the questionnaire is to gather academic responses to identify the level of risk in order that it can be defined as risk assessment level, which is crucial to enhancing the public's reassurance in the police.

[1]  L. Siegel,et al.  Introduction to Criminal Justice , 2019 .

[2]  William J Buchanan,et al.  Novel information sharing syntax for data sharing between police and community partners, using role-based security. , 2010 .

[3]  Rebecca Roberts,et al.  What is crime , 2008 .

[4]  R. Felson,et al.  Do theories of crime or violence explain race differences in delinquency? , 2008, Social science research.

[5]  Y. Kwan,et al.  Modification and simplification of thurstone scaling method, and its demonstration with a crime seriousness assessment , 2007 .

[6]  Y. Kwan,et al.  Perceived crime seriousness: Consensus and disparity , 2002 .

[7]  Brian Francis,et al.  A New Approach for Ranking 'Serious' Offences. The Use of Paired-Comparisons Methodology , 2001 .

[8]  M. Lanier,et al.  What Is Crime , 2001 .

[9]  M. Lanier,et al.  What Is Crime?: Controversies over the Nature of Crime and What to Do about It , 2001 .

[10]  Ying Keung Kwan,et al.  A crime index with Thurstone's scaling of crime severity , 2000 .

[11]  H. Hansluwka.  Measuring health. A review of quality of life measurement scales: by Ann Bowling , 1992 .

[12]  M. Hansel.  CITIZEN CRIME STEREOTYPES—NORMATIVE CONSENSUS REVISITED , 1987 .

[13]  R. McCleary,et al.  Effects of Legal Education and Work Experience on Perceptions of Crime Seriousness , 1981 .

[14]  B. MisraSasi,et al.  Measurement of Attitudes , 1977 .

[15]  C. Wellford,et al.  On the Measurement of Delinquency , 1975 .

[16]  Christine E. Bose,et al.  THE SERIOUSNESS OF CRIMES: NORMATIVE STRUCTURE AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES* , 1974 .

[17]  D. D. Akman,et al.  THE MEASUREMENT OF CRIME AND DELINQUENCY IN CANADA* A Replication Study , 1967 .

[18]  W. Marsden.  I and J , 2012 .

[19]  Nataša Rupčić.  To measure or not to measure , 2008 .

[20]  Iroon Polytechniou.  Influence of cultivation temperature on the ligninolytic activity of selected fungal strains , 2006 .

[21]  B. Francis,et al.  The Use of Paired-Comparisons Methodology , 2001 .

[22]  C. Emsley.  Albion's fatal attractions: Reflections upon the history of crime in England , 1996 .

[23]  David A. Parton,et al.  MEASURING CRIME SERIOUSNESS Lessons from the National Survey of Crime Severity , 1991 .

[24]  G. Newman,et al.  Crime and Deviance: A Comparative Perspective. , 1982 .

[25]  Robert D. Pursley,et al.  Introduction to criminal justice , 1975 .

[26]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  The Measurement of Attitudes. , 1950 .

[27]  The History of Crime in England , 1550-1914 , 2022 .