Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The M170 is selective for faces, not for expertise , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  fMRI activation of the fusiform gyrus and amygdala to cartoon characters but not to faces in a boy with autism , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[4]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  Yaoda Xu.  Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  C. Koch,et al.  Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain , 2005, Nature.

[7]  M. Tarr,et al.  Generating complex three-dimensional stimuli (Greebles) for haptic expertise training , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[8]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Interaction of Face and Voice Areas during Speaker Recognition , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Schultz.  Developmental deficits in social perception in autism: the role of the amygdala and fusiform face area , 2005, International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience.

[11]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The Training and Transfer of Real-World Perceptual Expertise , 2005, Psychological science.

[12]  T. Busey,et al.  Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for configural processing in fingerprint experts , 2005, Vision Research.

[13]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[14]  C. Jacques,et al.  Concurrent processing reveals competition between visual representations of faces , 2004, Neuroreport.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual expertise with nonface objects leads to competition with the early perceptual processing of faces in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Normal Greeble Learning in a Severe Case of Developmental Prosopagnosia , 2004, Neuron.

[17]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[18]  M. Tarr,et al.  Are chess experts any different from face, bird, or Greeble experts? , 2004 .

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Emiliano Ricciardi,et al.  Beyond sensory images: Object-based representation in the human ventral pathway. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Is the Fusiform Face Area Specialized for Faces, Individuation, or Expert Individuation? , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Attention to single letters activates left extrastriate cortex , 2004, NeuroImage.

[23]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article EXPERTISE IN TACTILE PATTERN RECOGNITION , 2022 .

[24]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  S. Lederman,et al.  Face recognition by hand , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  R. Malach,et al.  The topography of high-order human object areas , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[30]  J. Tanaka.  The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Keenan,et al.  Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. , 2001, British journal of psychology.

[33]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[34]  T. Hendler,et al.  A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  V Bruce,et al.  Configural Features in the Context of Upright and Inverted Faces , 2001, Perception.

[36]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[37]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  M. Tarr,et al.  Can Face Recognition Really be Dissociated from Object Recognition? , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  M. Tarr,et al.  Training ‘greeble’ experts: a framework for studying expert object recognition processes , 1998, Vision Research.

[41]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[42]  M. Tarr,et al.  Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging , 1997, Current Biology.

[43]  M. Tarr,et al.  Becoming a “Greeble” Expert: Exploring Mechanisms for Face Recognition , 1997, Vision Research.

[44]  G. Hole.  Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[45]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[46]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Distinctiveness and Expertise Effects with Homogeneous Stimuli: Towards a Model of Configural Coding , 1990, Perception.

[48]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[49]  I. Biederman,et al.  Sexing day-old chicks: A case study and expert systems analysis of a difficult perceptual-learning task. , 1987 .

[50]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[51]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[52]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual Expertise Effects Are Not All or None: Spatially Limited Perceptual Expertise for Faces in a Case of Prosopagnosia , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  R A Poldrack,et al.  The relationship between skill learning and repetition priming: experimental and computational analyses. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  M. Hauser,et al.  The design of animal communication , 1999 .

[56]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .