RFID Tag Acquisition Via Compressed Sensing: Fixed vs. Random Signature Assignment

We introduce a novel scheme to perform radio frequency identification (RFID) with compressed sensing techniques. The proposed scheme allows quick and reliable identification of several RFID tags, even at low signal-to-noise ratio. Contrary to the widely used frame slotted ALOHA (FSA) protocol, the tags activated by a reader deliberately respond simultaneously with their assigned signature during the acquisition phase; collisions are regarded as beneficial rather than destructive. The signatures are drawn from a huge signature pool, and the set of signatures that is assigned to the activated tags is very small compared to the total signature count. This introduces sparsity to the acquisition phase which, in turn, allows formulation of the acquisition as a compressed sensing measurement. Furthermore, our formulation permits the usage of a low-complexity approximate message passing algorithm for compressed sensing recovery. We compare two realizations of the compressed sensing-based approach to the FSA protocol. The first performs fixed signature assignment - this enables very quick identification but sacrifices flexibility. The second performs random signature assignment - this reduces the identification speed but provides flexibility. A comparison via simulation shows that both compressed sensing-based approaches significantly outperform FSA in terms of identification speed and robustness to noise.

[1]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Martin Mayer,et al.  RFID tag acquisition via compressed sensing , 2014, 2014 IEEE RFID Technology and Applications Conference (RFID-TA).

[3]  Ron Weinstein,et al.  RFID: a technical overview and its application to the enterprise , 2005, IT Professional.

[4]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[5]  Mo Li,et al.  ZOE: Fast cardinality estimation for large-scale RFID systems , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[6]  Norbert Goertz,et al.  Improving Approximate Message Passing Recovery of Sparse Binary Vectors by Post Processing , 2014 .

[7]  Alanson P. Sample,et al.  Design of an RFID-Based Battery-Free Programmable Sensing Platform , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[8]  Mo Li,et al.  P-MTI: Physical-Layer Missing Tag Identification via Compressive Sensing , 2013, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[9]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  Hideaki Sakai,et al.  Compressed Sensing-Based Tag Identification Protocol for a Passive RFID System , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[11]  Robert Langwieser,et al.  RFID Reader Receivers for Physical Layer Collision Recovery , 2010, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[12]  Xiaocheng Lin,et al.  Collision-based Radio frequency identification using compressive sensing , 2013, 2013 15th IEEE International Conference on Communication Technology.

[13]  R. DeVore,et al.  A Simple Proof of the Restricted Isometry Property for Random Matrices , 2008 .

[14]  Alf Johansson,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Frame-Slotted Aloha , 2011, 2011 7th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[15]  Mike E. Davies,et al.  Near Optimal Compressed Sensing Without Priors: Parametric SURE Approximate Message Passing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  Radio-Frequency Identification (RFID) applications: A brief introduction , 2007, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[17]  Norbert Goertz,et al.  RFID tag acquisition via compressed sensing: flexibility by random signature assignment , 2015, 2015 International EURASIP Workshop on RFID Technology (EURFID).

[18]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  VLSI Design of Approximate Message Passing for Signal Restoration and Compressive Sensing , 2012, IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

[19]  Kwan-Wu Chin,et al.  A Survey and Tutorial of RFID Anti-Collision Protocols , 2010, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[20]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  Efficient and reliable low-power backscatter networks , 2012, CCRV.

[21]  Mary Ann Ingram,et al.  Measurements of small-scale fading and path loss for long range RF tags , 2003 .

[22]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[23]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  Gitta Kutyniok,et al.  1 . 2 Sparsity : A Reasonable Assumption ? , 2012 .

[25]  M. Rupp,et al.  Channel estimation in tag collision scenarios , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on RFID (RFID).

[26]  David C. Yen,et al.  Taxonomy and survey of RFID anti-collision protocols , 2006, Comput. Commun..

[27]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Asymptotic Analysis of Complex LASSO via Complex Approximate Message Passing (CAMP) , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[28]  Robert Langwieser,et al.  Automatic leaking carrier canceller adjustment techniques , 2013, EURASIP J. Embed. Syst..

[29]  Andrea Montanari,et al.  Message-passing algorithms for compressed sensing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Robert Langwieser,et al.  A smart collision recovery receiver for RFIDs , 2013, EURASIP J. Embed. Syst..